Upcoming Anniversary: October 1st Will Mark 18 Years Of No Global Warming…

Not sure where you acquired such a misconception, but rain and temperature are not the same thing, particularly when the rain you claim(in the middle of an extensive drought) is regional (if it actually exists at all). Got a link?
 
Curry is now regarded as somewhat of a lazy crank by her fellow scientists. Figures skook would identify with her. Birds of a feather.

Skook, don't you find it problematic at all that your side has been reduced to conspiracy theories on message boards? Oh well. Good luck with trying to change the world by spamming and pouting. Sadly for you, the real scientists aren't paying any attention to your tantrums.

And SSDD, try to muster up your courage and explain why a cool LED flashlight can illuminate a hot object. Don't use that "But the LED is really hot!" big lie that you love so much, since we absolutely positively know the LED flashlight is cool, even the light-emitting bits at the heart of it, because the LED does not emit a continuous radiation curve that Planck's Law says every hot object must emit.

Your physics is crap, and even you know it. You're just too cowardly to admit what a brainwashed cultist you've been.

Yeah, so were all the previous scientists who bucked the consensus because the consensus was wrong....just like this time.
 
Hottest September ever.

The real world just keeps raining on your denier party.

Actually, the real world keeps refusing to warm....epic failure on the part of climate science and truly sad that so many helpless dupes have been taken in by the hoax.
 
Actually, the real world keeps refusing to warm....epic failure on the part of climate science and truly sad that so many helpless dupes have been taken in by the hoax.


Global Analysis - August 2014 State of the Climate National Climatic Data Center NCDC

Global Highlights

  • The combined average temperature across global land and ocean surfaces for August 2014 was record high for the month, at 0.75°C (1.35°F) above the 20th century average of 15.6°C (60.1°F), topping the previous record set in 1998.
  • The global land surface temperature was 0.99°C (1.78°F) above the 20th century average of 13.8°C (56.9°F), the second highest on record for August, behind 1998.
  • For the ocean, the August global sea surface temperature was 0.65°C (1.17°F) above the 20thcentury average of 16.4°C (61.4°F). This record high departure from average not only beats the previous August record set in 2005 by 0.08°C (0.14°F), but also beats the previous all-time record set just two months ago in June 2014 by 0.03°C (0.05°F).
  • The combined average global land and ocean surface temperature for the June–August period was also record high for this period, at 0.71°C (1.28°F) above the 20th century average of 16.4°C (61.5°F), beating the previous record set in 1998.
  • The June–August worldwide land surface temperature was 0.91°C (1.64°F) above the 20thcentury average, the fifth highest on record for this period. The global ocean surface temperature for the same period was 0.63°C (1.13°F) above the 20th century average, the highest on record for June–August. This beats the previous record set in 2009 by 0.04°C (0.07°F).
  • The combined average global land and ocean surface temperature for January–August (year-to-date) was 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.3°F), the third highest for this eight-month period on record.
Now, where are the links to the reputable sources you think you've got that show these points to be in error?
 
What are you talking about? You've already been shown multiple sources that support the contention that 2014 will probably be the warmest year in modern history. You keep denying it, yet you've not produced one iota of evidence supporting your contention. Why don't you either find some or admit the point?
 
What are you talking about? You've already been shown multiple sources that support the contention that 2014 will probably be the warmest year in modern history. You keep denying it, yet you've not produced one iota of evidence supporting your contention. Why don't you either find some or admit the point?

Actually no not really as when the mathematicians get a hold of it, they unusually get downgraded quietly..
 
Why don't you let us know when that happens. Till then I'm going to take the word of the experts that say otherwise. The greenhouse effect is quite real and the world is still getting warmer.
 
What are you talking about? You've already been shown multiple sources that support the contention that 2014 will probably be the warmest year in modern history. You keep denying it, yet you've not produced one iota of evidence supporting your contention. Why don't you either find some or admit the point?
I want the raw data results. Funny, you all jump around on this forum and avoid the questions you are asked.
I said, let's see the thousand or so stations and calculate the average. Let's not normalize the data to fit your scam. Nope you can't do that, LoSiNg:lmao::lmao:
 
Hottest September ever.

The real world just keeps raining on your denier party.
IN a Word... NO!!!
The only thing raining on you is the piss from your masters.

The USCRN shows a drop of 0.3 deg C over the last month. Who to believe? the real temps or the adjusted ones.....
 
Last edited:
Hottest September ever.

The real world just keeps raining on your denier party.

Well, as 2014 winds down, looks like it is going to be the warmest year on record. With no exceptional months on record, no El Nino, and in spite of a low TSI.

And no cognitive thought from the crock!

Just how do you think it happened? Or did it? so far this year GISS has blanketed the numbers by over 0.77 deg C. Its all a lie....
 
Last edited:
Of course it is... of course it is... now you just lay your head back down and go to sleep. Don't you worry about a thing. Everything is okay. The world is fine. Santa will be along any day now...
 
:shock:

SNIP:
Goracle-face.jpg

Little things like facts don’t bother the Goracle and his disciples.


(CNSNews.com)

According to the datasets used last year, October 1st will mark the 18th year of “no significant warming trend in surface average temperature,” says Patrick Michaels, director of the Cato Institute’s Center for the Study of Science.
And even if the current 18-year trend were to end, it would still take nearly 25 years for average global temperature figures to reflect the change, said Michaels, who has a Ph.D. in ecological climatology and spent three decades as a research professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.
Sooner or later, even Al Gore and the numerous scientists, academics and politicians who agree with him that “Earth has a fever” will have to admit that their climate models predicting catastrophic global warming were off by a long shot, said Michaels, who was also a contributing editor to the United Nations’ second Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.
“It has to be admitted eventually that too much warming was forecast too fast. That just has to happen. You can’t go on and on and on,” he told CNSNews.com.
Keep reading…

FROM:
Upcoming Anniversary October 1st Will Mark 18 Years Of No Global Warming 8230 Weasel Zippers

Yet, in the name progressivism, they keep pushing the agenda from all angles. It gets tiring......

Perhaps when the earth is actually COLD they will blame Bush.
 
What are you talking about? You've already been shown multiple sources that support the contention that 2014 will probably be the warmest year in modern history. You keep denying it, yet you've not produced one iota of evidence supporting your contention. Why don't you either find some or admit the point?
Strangely enough the places that are warm enough to raise the average are invariably places with the least coverage and require the most "fill in" in other words. ....fiction.
 
Mamooth just loves the king's new clothes....she sees all the pretty colors and luxurious fabrics, and meticulous tailoring, and wishes she could have clothes just like them.

And you just can't do anything against that kind of mentality. Especially when "science" has been so nonchalantly manipulated and fabricated and fashioned around the predetermined conclusions they desire. You can't point out that deforestation is a far bigger contributor to CO2 in the atmosphere than automobiles. You can't point out the water is the single largest greenhouse contributor of any substance known to man. All you can do is just let people die of old age, and take their lunacy with them.
 
Swim, you're just really awful at basic science and logic. Like most deniers, you're a poster boy for Dunning-Kruger syndrome, too stupid to ever understand how stupid you are. We could try to explain where you went wrong ... heck, we have ... but you won't be capable of understanding. First, because you're just kind of slow, and second, because you're so emotionally invested in getting everything wrong. Your cult would kick you out if you weren't a moron, so you try hard to be a moron.

Understand that you being hopelessly clueless about the science has no bearing on the correctness of the science. Gravity won't fail because you don't understand it, and neither will the physics behind global warming.
 

Forum List

Back
Top