Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, the idea that we can use hundred year old readings to compare them to modern readings is like saying that your great grandma's oven was just as accurate in setting its temperature as a modern day electric oven with electronic controls and internal thermometer.That makes zero sense.
It's like saying if my oven runs 20 degrees low, I have to throw away the oven, instead of correcting what setting I use.
In the real world, people correct for errors.
In other words, you will explain away the fact that alarmists have been consistently wrong.You're a denier, so it was just a matter of time. You know, before you regressed to crazy conspiracy theories to explain why all the data says you're wrong.
I've seen the faked lists. Would you like to repost one, so your dishonesty can be highlighted? You'll post a list of things that were never predicted, things taken wildly out of context, things that non-climate scientists said, things that had nothing to do with climate, things that only one guy said, and things that were proven to be correct.
Nor yours.Meanwhile, the actual climate predictions have been excellent.
You are entitled to yoru feelings, but don't imagine that they're based on the science. The facts don't care about your feelings.
That was just a dumb opinion piece from a paid hack. You're regurgitating crazy right-wing propaganda.
So what's next, telling us about the COVID hoax? Talking about how Trump won the election? If you're going to spout crazy right-wing propaganda, go all out.
www.newscientist.com
Nietzsche said “truth doesn't mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged.”On of my ongoing points is that denialism, being purely political kookery, is now only pushed now by right-wing uber-fascist cranks. Denialism is a mandatory belief of that cult.
Thus, I thank the resident uber-fascist cranks here for jumping in to prove my point so conclusively. They're literally not capable of discussing the topic without melting down into various hysterical political conspiracy theories.
If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instanlty vanish along with it, because it's pure politics.
If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change a bit, because it's actual science.
I visualize you being very pissed off that climate ends up normal and not willing to harm you.Taken into account.
Taken into account, which caused a screaming meltdown in deniers.
That's not how science works. You don't say "You have to prove it's not fairy magic, otherwise we must assume it is fairy magic!". You're the one proposing fairy magic, so you need to show it exists.
You could look this stuff up yourself. Why don't you? Why do you expect us to spoonfeed you?
Your special talent is denying.On of my ongoing points is that denialism, being purely political kookery, is now only pushed now by right-wing uber-fascist cranks. Denialism is a mandatory belief of that cult.
Thus, I thank the resident uber-fascist cranks here for jumping in to prove my point so conclusively. They're literally not capable of discussing the topic without melting down into various hysterical political conspiracy theories.
If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instanlty vanish along with it, because it's pure politics.
If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change a bit, because it's actual science.
The Big lie came when Gore left office. Even Bill Clinton had not spread the enormous lie.Deniers were humiliated over that BigLie a decade ago, and you want to revisit it? Wow.
It's fasciinating, how emotionally invested in the BigLie you are. A brave person just tells the truth. that the librals side is far more honest. You're indepednent song and dance is fundamentally gutless.
Now, what other debunked propaganda do you want to sell us? You're going all-in with the kook-right propaganda now, so don't stop now.
This witness invited by Democrats is very typical of warming alarmists.
He’s only about as old as Greta T. Both can be forgiven for their youthful foolishness.
The alarmists on here are old enough to know better, but choose to flaunt their ignorance.
I actually felt bad for the guy, because he's young and being used by people who are making big bucks off the global warming scare.I saw that on You Tube this past week and my testimony is you are correct that happened when the boy was questioned by Sen. Kennedy.
You're asking why FDR didn't talk about climate change?Why didn't FDR ever mention this to the nation?
Facts don't care about your feelings, snowflake.In other words, you will explain away the fact that alarmists have been consistently wrong.
Seems like a reasonable question.You're asking why FDR didn't talk about climate change?
Hey, do you know how much of the Earth's atmosphere is carbon? Ski boy had no idea, what about you?Facts don't care about your feelings, snowflake.
Dang, you're dumber than Kennedy, and just as butthurt.Hey, do you know how much of the Earth's atmosphere is carbon? Ski boy had no idea, what about you?
No, it's 'effin retarded.Seems like a reasonable question.
Not at a detectable level, no. At the time, it was well within natural variation.Are you claiming now that Climate Change was not happening in FDR's time?
You think ski boy was an expert?Dang, you're dumber than Kennedy, and just as butthurt.
An expert witness is supposed to address one topic. It's not a surprise when they don't know the whole topic. Kennedy and you look really stupid for failing at that basic point.
Are you a bot? None of your posts show any originality at all.So, can you answer your own question? It will be amusing to find out how little you know on the topic.
I suggest you deflect to something else now. That is what you're good at, after all. Mabye Run and see what the latest talking points from Moscow and Beijing are that yoru masters want to pass down to you.
On snow levels of where he hangs out, yes.You think ski boy was an expert?
I understand why it makes you uncomfortable.No, it's 'effin retarded.
Do you understand why it's 'effin retarded? Rest assured everyone else does.
So, the measurements up to FDR's time are invalid?Not at a detectable level, no.
As it is now.At the time, it was well within natural variation.
That's really stupid
