The REAL homosexual Agenda...

Lmfao...you got me there. I always thought you was spelled youy...how could I ever have made that type of mistake? Oh wait...maybe it was because mine were typos and yours was a spelling error. Include, of course, the fact that I was posting at 4 in the morning and was drunk as fuck.

And I've said a lot about the topic at hand. You just dislike it because you can't handle alternative points of view.



Actually your study does not refute her claim. Lets see if you can use a little bit of brainpower and figure out why not.



Lmao...are you really defending CA?...I guess I can see why. You two really are similar in many respects.

So you are the board jerk off... OK... got it.

Get a life.
 
So you are the board jerk off... OK... got it.

Get a life.

I take it that means you were unable to figure out why your link did not refute her claim, huh?

What a surprise...

I'll give you a hint...it has to do with the words "per capita".
 
fagots are freaks of nature. they need to be put into prison camps and experimented on. they dont have rights. america doesnt need any more faggots, who are child molestors. all child molestors are homosexists, and take part in homoism.

mexicans are to crime as homoists are to child molesting
 
I have to say I agree with you a little. I have seen people protest because they want people to know about their sex lives and is done with the same sex. No matter what we are in this world, we owe it to ourselves and our neighbors to be civilized and respectful. Every group of people whether white, black, gay or straight has mean, rude people that should be eterminated from this world. I do not care who you sleep with. I do not want to know about anybody's sex lives. MYOB, and the world will be a better place.

As far as religion goes, the last time I checked I cannot get into heaven by hating gays, I do not please my God by hating anything. I have to try and live my life everyday, trying to do the right thing for others and for myself. Where do you find the time to hate everyone else for thier sins?
 
I have to say I agree with you a little. I have seen people protest because they want people to know about their sex lives and is done with the same sex. No matter what we are in this world, we owe it to ourselves and our neighbors to be civilized and respectful. Every group of people whether white, black, gay or straight has mean, rude people that should be eterminated from this world. I do not care who you sleep with. I do not want to know about anybody's sex lives. MYOB, and the world will be a better place.

As far as religion goes, the last time I checked I cannot get into heaven by hating gays, I do not please my God by hating anything. I have to try and live my life everyday, trying to do the right thing for others and for myself. Where do you find the time to hate everyone else for thier sins?

I don't think anyone here is purporting that we should "hate" homos. However, the Bible is pretty harsh about what it has to say about them...

What does the Bible say about homosexuality?


There are those who like to say that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality. Various verses are cited (out of context) and the verses that people use to show that homosexuality is wrong are explained away. The world wants to change God's words and meanings into something more suitable to its sinful desires. Nevertheless, the truth stands: The Bible condemns homosexuality as a sin. Let's look at what it says.

Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."

Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them"

1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Rom. 1:26-28, "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."

Homosexuality is clearly condemned by the Bible. It goes against the created order of God. He created Adam and then made a woman. This is what God has ordained and it is what is right. Unlike other sins, homosexuality has a severe judgment administered by God Himself. This judgment is simple: They are given over to their passions. That means that their hearts are allowed to be hardened by their sins (Romans 1:18ff). As a result, they can no longer see the error of what they are doing. Without an awareness of their sinfulness, there will be no repentance and trusting in Jesus. Without Jesus, they will have no forgiveness. Without forgiveness, there is no salvation.

What should be the Christian's Response to the Homosexual?

Just because someone is a homosexual does not mean that we cannot love him (or her) or pray for him (her). Homosexuality is a sin and like any other sin, it needs to be dealt with in the only way possible. It needs to be laid at the cross, repented of, and never done again.
As a Christian, you should pray for the salvation of the homosexual the same you would any other person in sin. The homosexual is still made in the image of God -- even though he is in grave sin. Therefore, you should show him same dignity as anyone else you come in contact with. However, this does not mean that you are to approve of their sin. Don't compromise your witness for a socially acceptable opinion that is void of godliness.
http://www.carm.org/questions/homosexuality.htm
 
I take it that means you were unable to figure out why your link did not refute her claim, huh?

What a surprise...

I'll give you a hint...it has to do with the words "per capita".

No... the "point," dimwit, is that homos are far more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. THAT is a PROVEN FACT.
 
No... the "point," dimwit, is that homos are far more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. THAT is a PROVEN FACT.

Its not a fact, but lets take it as one just for fun.

Now its also true that those molested by pedophiles are far more likely to be molested by someone straight than someone gay. Can you reconcile them? I'm trying to make you less stupid boy...pay attention now and try hard.
 
Its not a fact, but lets take it as one just for fun.
Yes... it is a fact.

Now its also true that those molested by pedophiles are far more likely to be molested by someone straight than someone gay. Can you reconcile them? I'm trying to make you less stupid boy...pay attention now and try hard.
Not "per capita." You DO know what that means, don't you son? You're the one that threw it out there.
 
Yes... it is a fact.

Based on what exactly...a few scientific studies? Just curious...if a few scientific studies say something is true, do you accept it as a fact?

Not "per capita." You DO know what that means, don't you son? You're the one that threw it out there.

And where exactly in Jillians post did it say per capita that might justify you saying she lied? Ah, yes, it didn't. Hence, you were, surprise surprise, wrong yet again.
 
I don't think anyone here is purporting that we should "hate" homos. However, the Bible is pretty harsh about what it has to say about them...


http://www.carm.org/questions/homosexuality.htm

So you believe everything that this 2000-year-old book says. It is hard to believe that people are still shoving this 2000 year old book at people as a reason to oppose homosexuality. Okay. Then you better be obeying the other rules and admonitions of the Bible:

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/chapter10.html

The women are to choose between concealing their heads and having their hair completely shaven. Later, Paul takes away the latter choice by declaring a shaved head to be a disgrace in need of covering (1 Corinthians 11:5-7).

This is a New Testament rule. There are many more bizarre Biblical instructions that are often overlooked today by those so focused on showing that God opposes homosexuality. So what if he does? Don’t atheists exist?

Also see http://www.diy-punk.org/diyfiles/hcpguide/8.html

The Old Testament has some interesting rules about women, particularly where menstruation and childbirth are concerned:

After bearing a male child, women are unclean for forty days (Leviticus 12:2-4)

After bearing a female child, women are unclean for eighty days (Leviticus 12:5)

Do you obey all of these rules? Do you consider them outdated because they're ancient Jewish laws from the Old Testament? If so, read on; the New Testament is equally sexist.

Many prohibitions can be found in 1 Corinthians 11:3-15, 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 and 1 Timothy 2:9-14. Christian women must never have short hair or go without a hat, hood or scarf covering their hair; they must never speak in church; they're not allowed to braid their long hair or wear jewelry (which probably includes piercings); they can't wear expensive clothes (does an overpriced hooded sweatshirt count?); and they certainly can't accept any leadership role within the scene which may cause them to have authority over any men. In addition to all these Biblical Thou Shalt Nots, there are quite a few Thou Shalts. For example, in Titus 2:3-5, older women are urged to be reverent and sober, while younger women are told to be chaste, domestic, and submissive to their husbands. So, Christian males, it's your job to keep Christian females in line with these Biblical laws. Good luck, and keep in mind the Apostle Paul's admonition from 1 Corinthians 7:1 -- "It is well for a man not to touch a woman."
 
Pale_rider, you have apparently just qualifed for a new Guinnis world record for posting Garbage. You have out-done yourself.----Congrats!
 
liberals dont make conservatives look bad, they do that themselves on this site.

pale rider is a voice of reason in a sea of liberalism that is this board.
 
Hi, new here. I have 4 school age children. I am required to send them to school by law. My oldest is 17 and I have seen schools go from teaching facts and avoiding discussions about their personal views on sex (and sexual orientation) and politics to spouting their opinions like they are facts. My husband is active duty military and we have been in no less than 6 different school districts in different states; our current school district in CA has been the worst about it. I'm not sure if that is because of the location or if it is like this now in other districts that we haven't had more recent experiences with.
If I am equired to send my child to school to be educated (which I have no problem with doing that) I think that public schools should stick to teaching facts and leave there opinions out of the classroom...at the very least, they should make it very clear that what they are stating is their opinion and not facts.
 
Whether or not a homosexual lifestyle is ok or not is an opinion, and I don't appreciate schools teaching that it is perfectly normal and acceptable as if it was factual.
 
We must realize that Homosexuals ,are never accepted in many African Tribes.
They are expelled from the tribe,when their sexual orientation is exposed.It is viewed as
abnormal and, they remove the person from the tribal society.

I do agree with you,that there is a Homosexual militant agenda at work in the United
States,who are trying to promote Homosexuality as "Normal" or "Natural", it is not.
We must realize that the homosexual has infiltrated all levels of society.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007

Forum List

Back
Top