Salutations

[Lutroo]

pssssssssst....this guy is why many run the other way when someone claims they are christian and represent their god. Then they wonder wtf is wrong with everyone else instead of looking in da mirror.

And yet here you are, bad mouthing me, and you don't even know me. I have not said one cross word to anyone. I have not criticized anyone. I have not been mean or disrespectful to anyone. But here you are, heaping scorn and ridicule on me. What does that say about you?

 

[frigidweirdo]

You can say that about most religious figures

I could probably say the same thing about you. Congratulations. After reviewing some of your previous replies, I decided to give you the honor of being the first on my ignore list.

So, you're putting people on ignore because you don't agree with them?

I put him on ignore, because I reviewed his previous replies and determined that I do not wish to hear from him again. It has nothing to do with whether or not I agree with him. I just do not care to listen to what he has to say. Or, more precisely, the way he says it.

Well, you aren't going to last long on this forum then.

I do put a lot of people on ignore, but because they're insulting mostly.

If someone has something to say, and they make their point, then I don't have a problem with this, even if I don't agree.

Do you not listen? I said it has nothing to do with whether or not I agree with him. I find him a repulsive creature, based on his previous comments. That's all. If he agreed with me, and still talked the way he does, I'd still ignore him. And why is this even an issue. They put the ignore feature on this site so people could use it. Are you saying that you have a problem with me exercising that right, for whatever reason I deem necessary?

I listened, and then I made my point.

You believe in God I assume. So this person was made by God, I can assume you believe this too. You said you were coming on here to spread the word of God. Are you only going to spread it to people who speak in a manner you like? Does someone who speaks in a manner you don't like not have questions that you should be tackling?

I don't know you, I can make assumptions, but I will also ask things, make possible sentences etc in order to find out what you think.

 

[xband]

A sinner, saved by grace. I'm here to spread the Word of God.

I'm sure that I will make many enemies in the process, but that will just mean that I'm doing it right.

I don't pretend to have all the answers, or to be a Bible expert. But the Gospel of Christ is simple enough for a child to understand.

And since the best way to win others to Christ is by example, I ask that anyone who observes me conducting myself in a manner that is unchristian, please bring it to my attention. I'm not perfect, and I will probably lose my temper and say something I shouldn't. I'm only human. That's why apologies were invented. ^_^

Thanks for joining the forum. I have one question about Christianity if you would be kind enough to answer. What is the Holy Ghost?

LOL! I haven't come to a conclusion on that yet. I was raised a Baptist, so I was taught about the Holy Trinity. Others think it is heretical because there is only one God. From what I know about it, the trinity teaching does not teach that there are three Gods. It teaches that there is one God comprised of three beings. Just as humans have a body soul and a spirit. Are we three people? No. Neither is God. Personally, I believe that the closest you can come to explaining God is that he is one God with three aspects. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Bottom line. I don't think anyone can put God in a box. He is infinite. He is above us in so many ways. We will never comprehend His Majesty. It is enough to know that I deserve death, but He took pity on me.

Lu, the best way I can explain the Trinity is that it is 3 factions of the same God. Sybil was one person with several personalities, each with a different purpose. God manifested Himself into 3 personalities, God, the Father, God the Son and God, the Holy Spirit. Sybil's alter selves were confined to her mind. God's were not. Yet each has their own identity, each with their own role to perform.
As Dolly, the cloned sheep, was to her mother, (the spiting image, but a different being), Christ and the Holy Spirit are to the Father.
Hope that helps. You can conclude who the Spirit is from Scripture. He is very well defined. But don't add to it or take away from what you read, or draw your own conclusions. Pray for discernment before you read and before long you will know exactly what the Holy Spirit is and what His strengths are.

Jesus is called the Lamb of God so I see your reference to sheep.

 

[Gracie]

Hi Gracie girl. You doing well?

Hi hon! I am doing well, yes. And you? Only time I get to *see* you is when I call ya to a thread.

Anyway...DADDY and I are doing just dandy. My comfort. My friend. He helps a lot.

 

[Lewdog]

pssssssssst....this guy is why many run the other way when someone claims they are christian and represent their god. Then they wonder wtf is wrong with everyone else instead of looking in da mirror.

And yet here you are, bad mouthing me, and you don't even know me. I have not said one cross word to anyone. I have not criticized anyone. I have not been mean or disrespectful to anyone. But here you are, heaping scorn and ridicule on me. What does that say about you?

" I find him a repulsive creature" - Lutroo

Really? So you are a son of God and you just lied? Not very Christian of you.

 

[Lutroo]

I don't think anyone can put God in a box. He is infinite. He is above us in so many ways. We will never comprehend His Majesty.

I said I was done...but...DING DING DING!!!!
Which is why there are many paths, many ways, many languages, many signs, many understandings.....from God to each person individually. So since nobody can ever comprehend Him, how can they dictate to others the right "ways"? Ya can't.

As ghandi said....in so many words...."I like your Jesus. His followers, not so much".

And yet God gave us the Bible. It has everything needed for a personal relationship with God. If ones beliefs align with Gods word, then everything is fine. But so many want to rely on their own understanding. That is where problems begin. The only way to interpret Gods word is with the help of the Holy Spirit. This is why there are so many interpretations of the Bible. Many do not have, or listen to, Gods Holy Spirit. Without the Holy Ghost, there can be no understanding. And I'm not dictating anything, as you put it. Gods word says that Jesus is the only way to God. There is no alternative way to interpret this. It say what it says. Do you disagree?

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

 

[Lutroo]

pssssssssst....this guy is why many run the other way when someone claims they are christian and represent their god. Then they wonder wtf is wrong with everyone else instead of looking in da mirror.

And yet here you are, bad mouthing me, and you don't even know me. I have not said one cross word to anyone. I have not criticized anyone. I have not been mean or disrespectful to anyone. But here you are, heaping scorn and ridicule on me. What does that say about you?

" I find him a repulsive creature" - Lutroo

Really? So you are a son of God and you just lied? Not very Christian of you.

You might call it splitting hairs, but saying that someone's behavior repulses me is not being insulting to that person. Especially since I did not say it to them. I was merely stating my opinion of someone.

 

[BULLDOG]

I said I was done...but...DING DING DING!!!!
Which is why there are many paths, many ways, many languages, many signs, many understandings.....from God to each person individually. So since nobody can ever comprehend Him, how can they dictate to others the right "ways"? Ya can't.

As ghandi said....in so many words...."I like your Jesus. His followers, not so much".

And yet God gave us the Bible. It has everything needed for a personal relationship with God. If ones beliefs align with Gods word, then everything is fine. But so many want to rely on their own understanding. That is where problems begin. The only way to interpret Gods word is with the help of the Holy Spirit. This is why there are so many interpretations of the Bible. Many do not have, or listen to, Gods Holy Spirit. Without the Holy Ghost, there can be no understanding. And I'm not dictating anything, as you put it. Gods word says that Jesus is the only way to God. There is no alternative way to interpret this. It say what it says. Do you disagree?

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

 

[Lewdog]

pssssssssst....this guy is why many run the other way when someone claims they are christian and represent their god. Then they wonder wtf is wrong with everyone else instead of looking in da mirror.

And yet here you are, bad mouthing me, and you don't even know me. I have not said one cross word to anyone. I have not criticized anyone. I have not been mean or disrespectful to anyone. But here you are, heaping scorn and ridicule on me. What does that say about you?

" I find him a repulsive creature" - Lutroo

Really? So you are a son of God and you just lied? Not very Christian of you.

You might call it splitting hairs, but saying that someone's behavior repulses me is not being insulting to that person. Especially since I did not say it to them. I was merely stating my opinion of someone.

No, you said they were a repulsive creature. You didn't say they had revolting habits. There is a difference, and when you post it on a forum, you might as well be saying it to their face as they can read it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I said I was done...but...DING DING DING!!!!
Which is why there are many paths, many ways, many languages, many signs, many understandings.....from God to each person individually. So since nobody can ever comprehend Him, how can they dictate to others the right "ways"? Ya can't.

As ghandi said....in so many words...."I like your Jesus. His followers, not so much".

And yet God gave us the Bible. It has everything needed for a personal relationship with God. If ones beliefs align with Gods word, then everything is fine. But so many want to rely on their own understanding. That is where problems begin. The only way to interpret Gods word is with the help of the Holy Spirit. This is why there are so many interpretations of the Bible. Many do not have, or listen to, Gods Holy Spirit. Without the Holy Ghost, there can be no understanding. And I'm not dictating anything, as you put it. Gods word says that Jesus is the only way to God. There is no alternative way to interpret this. It say what it says. Do you disagree?

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

The New Testament? Which one?

Documented evidence? What do you mean by "documented evidence"?

You believe it's safe to say? Does this mean you don't know that it's safe to say?

You say that "it is accurate", which version is accurate?

Also, you do have time. I'm willing to wait. I'm willing to wait for you to write a detailed post and I will read that detailed post which has your argument in it.

 

[Lutroo]

And yet God gave us the Bible. It has everything needed for a personal relationship with God. If ones beliefs align with Gods word, then everything is fine. But so many want to rely on their own understanding. That is where problems begin. The only way to interpret Gods word is with the help of the Holy Spirit. This is why there are so many interpretations of the Bible. Many do not have, or listen to, Gods Holy Spirit. Without the Holy Ghost, there can be no understanding. And I'm not dictating anything, as you put it. Gods word says that Jesus is the only way to God. There is no alternative way to interpret this. It say what it says. Do you disagree?

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

 

[xband]

And yet God gave us the Bible. It has everything needed for a personal relationship with God. If ones beliefs align with Gods word, then everything is fine. But so many want to rely on their own understanding. That is where problems begin. The only way to interpret Gods word is with the help of the Holy Spirit. This is why there are so many interpretations of the Bible. Many do not have, or listen to, Gods Holy Spirit. Without the Holy Ghost, there can be no understanding. And I'm not dictating anything, as you put it. Gods word says that Jesus is the only way to God. There is no alternative way to interpret this. It say what it says. Do you disagree?

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

The reliable evidence is written in Coptic and the books are stored in still occupied ancient Coptic monasteries in Egypt.

 

[Lutroo]

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

Tell you what. There are so many hostile replies coming at me, I can't keep up with them. You guys fight it out amongst yourselves. I will not hang around in my own introduction thread and be verbally abused. If you would care to comment on my other threads, feel free. I'm out of here.

 

[BULLDOG]

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

No reason ancient manuscripts can't be considered documentation if they meet the same requirements as any other evidence. Using the Bible to prove the Bible doesn't work, but if you have other unrelated manuscripts that mention the same incidents, that might work. There are a lot of stories in the bible, so there should be a lot of manuscripts other than in the bible to prove they were real.

 

[BULLDOG]

I have a question.

Do you believe the universe was made by God and why?

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

The reliable evidence is written in Coptic and the books are stored in still occupied ancient Coptic monasteries in Egypt.

So there is evidence, but it's secret? Sounds like all the other times people have made that claim.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

Tell you what. There are so many hostile replies coming at me, I can't keep up with them. You guys fight it out amongst yourselves. I will not hang around in my own introduction thread and be verbally abused. If you would care to comment on my other threads, feel free. I'm out of here.

RUN FOREST RUN!!!!

 

[Lutroo]

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

No reason ancient manuscripts can't be considered documentation if they meet the same requirements as any other evidence. Using the Bible to prove the Bible doesn't work, but if you have other unrelated manuscripts that mention the same incidents, that might work. There are a lot of stories in the bible, so there should be a lot of manuscripts other than in the bible to prove they were real.

For starters...

A Common Flood Story. Not just the Hebrews (Gen. 6–8), but Mesopotamians, Egyptians, and Greeks all report a flood in primordial times. A Sumerian king list from c. 2100 BC divides itself into two categories: those kings who ruled before a great flood and those who ruled after it. One of the earliest examples of Sumero-Akkadian-Babylonian literature, the Gilgamesh Epic, describes a great flood sent as punishment by the gods, with humanity saved only when the pious Utnapishtim (AKA, “the Mesopotamian Noah”) builds a ship and saves the animal world thereon. A later Greek counterpart, the story of Deucalion and Phyrra, tells of a couple who survived a great flood sent by an angry Zeus. Taking refuge atop Mount Parnassus (AKA, “the Greek Ararat”), they supposedly repopulated the earth by heaving stones behind them that sprang into human beings.
The Code of Hammurabi. This seven-foot black diorite stele, discovered at Susa and presently located in the Louvre museum, contains 282 engraved laws of Babylonian King Hammurabi (fl. 1750 BC). The common basis for this law code is the lex talionis (“the law of the tooth”), showing that there was a common Semitic law of retribution in the ancient Near East, which is clearly reflected in the Pentateuch. Exodus 21:23–25, for example, reads: “But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot…” (niv).
The Nuzi Tablets. The some 20,000 cuneiform clay tablets discovered at the ruins of Nuzi, east of the Tigris River and datable to c. 1500 BC, reveal institutions, practices, and customs remarkably congruent to those found in Genesis. These tablets include treaties, marriage arrangements, rules regarding inheritance, adoption, and the like.
The Existence of Hittites. Genesis 23 reports that Abraham buried Sarah in the Cave of Machpelah, which he purchased from Ephron the Hittite. Second Samuel 11 tells of David’s adultery with Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah the Hittite. A century ago the Hittites were unknown outside of the Old Testament, and critics claimed that they were a figment of biblical imagination. In 1906, however, archaeologists digging east of Ankara, Turkey, discovered the ruins of Hattusas, the ancient Hittite capital at what is today called Boghazkoy, as well as its vast collection of Hittite historical records, which showed an empire flourishing in the mid-second millennium BC. This critical challenge, among many others, was immediately proved worthless — a pattern that would often be repeated in the decades to come.
The Merneptah Stele. A seven-foot slab engraved with hieroglyphics, also called the Israel Stele, boasts of the Egyptian pharaoh’s conquest of Libyans and peoples in Palestine, including the Israelites: “Israel — his seed is not.” This is the earliest reference to Israel in nonbiblical sources and demonstrates that, as of c. 1230 BC, the Hebrews were already living in the Promised Land.
Biblical Cities Attested Archaeologically. In addition to Jericho, places such as Haran, Hazor, Dan, Megiddo, Shechem, Samaria, Shiloh, Gezer, Gibeah, Beth Shemesh, Beth Shean, Beersheba, Lachish, and many other urban sites have been excavated, quite apart from such larger and obvious locations as Jerusalem or Babylon. Such geographical markers are extremely significant in demonstrating that fact, not fantasy, is intended in the Old Testament historical narratives; otherwise, the specificity regarding these urban sites would have been replaced by “Once upon a time” narratives with only hazy geographical parameters, if any.
Israel’s enemies in the Hebrew Bible likewise are not contrived but solidly historical. Among the most dangerous of these were the Philistines, the people after whom Palestine itself would be named. Their earliest depiction is on the Temple of Rameses III at Thebes, c. 1150 BC, as “peoples of the sea” who invaded the Delta area and later the coastal plain of Canaan. The Pentapolis (five cities) they established — namely Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gaza, Gath, and Ekron — have all been excavated, at least in part, and some remain cities to this day. Such precise urban evidence measures favorably when compared with the geographical sites claimed in the holy books of other religious systems, which often have no basis whatever in reality.10
Shishak’s Invasion of Judah. First Kings 14 and 2 Chronicles 12 tell of Pharaoh Shishak’s conquest of Judah in the fifth year of the reign of King Rehoboam, the brainless son of Solomon, and how Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem was robbed of its treasures on that occasion. This victory is also commemorated in hieroglyphic wall carvings on the Temple of Amon at Thebes.
The Moabite Stone. Second Kings 3 reports that Mesha, the king of Moab, rebelled against the king of Israel following the death of Ahab. A three-foot stone slab, also called the Mesha Stele, confirms the revolt by claiming triumph over Ahab’s family, c. 850 BC, and that Israel had “perished forever.”
Obelisk of Shalmaneser III. In 2 Kings 9–10, Jehu is mentioned as King of Israel (841–814 BC). That the growing power of Assyria was already encroaching on the northern kings prior to their ultimate conquest in 722 BC is demonstrated by a six-and-a-half-foot black obelisk discovered in the ruins of the palace at Nimrud in 1846. On it, Jehu is shown kneeling before Shalmaneser III and offering tribute to the Assyrian king, the only relief we have to date of a Hebrew monarch.
Burial Plaque of King Uzziah. Down in Judah, King Uzziah ruled from 792 to 740 BC, a contemporary of Amos, Hosea, and Isaiah. Like Solomon, he began well and ended badly. In 2 Chronicles 26 his sin is recorded, which resulted in his being struck with leprosy later in life. When Uzziah died, he was interred in a “field of burial that belonged to the kings.” His stone burial plaque has been discovered on the Mount of Olives, and it reads: “Here, the bones of Uzziah, King of Judah, were brought. Do not open.”
Hezekiah’s Siloam Tunnel Inscription. King Hezekiah of Judah ruled from 721 to 686 BC. Fearing a siege by the Assyrian king, Sennacherib, Hezekiah preserved Jerusalem’s water supply by cutting a tunnel through 1,750 feet of solid rock from the Gihon Spring to the Pool of Siloam inside the city walls (2 Kings 20; 2 Chron. 32). At the Siloam end of the tunnel, an inscription, presently in the archaeological museum at Istanbul, Turkey, celebrates this remarkable accomplishment. The tunnel is probably the only biblical site that has not changed its appearance in 2,700 years.
The Sennacherib Prism. After having conquered the 10 northern tribes of Israel, the Assyrians moved southward to do the same to Judah (2 Kings 18–19). The prophet Isaiah, however, told Hezekiah that God would protect Judah and Jerusalem against Sennacherib (2 Chron. 32; Isa. 36–37). Assyrian records virtually confirm this. The cuneiform on a hexagonal, 15-inch baked clay prism found at the Assyrian capital of Nineveh describes Sennacherib’s invasion of Judah in 701 BC in which it claims that the Assyrian king shut Hezekiah inside Jerusalem “like a caged bird.” Like the biblical record, however, it does not state that he conquered Jerusalem, which the prism certainly would have done had this been the case. The Assyrians, in fact, bypassed Jerusalem on their way to Egypt, and the city would not fall until the time of Nebuchadnezzar and the Neo-Babylonians in 586 BC. Sennacherib himself returned to Nineveh where his own sons murdered him.

 

[xband]

Doesn't matter what I believe. The Bible says it happened. That's good enough for me.

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

No reason ancient manuscripts can't be considered documentation if they meet the same requirements as any other evidence. Using the Bible to prove the Bible doesn't work, but if you have other unrelated manuscripts that mention the same incidents, that might work. There are a lot of stories in the bible, so there should be a lot of manuscripts other than in the bible to prove they were real.

The word David has only been found once carved on a broken stele in modern day Syria. The stele says House of David.

 

[Lutroo]

So why do you bother coming on here then? This is a place to debate, to talk about things. You seem only interested in regurgitating what you've read in a book.

Here are some things that are said in the King James Bible. I'll assume you agree with them.

"thou shalt have treasure" matthew 19:21

Woohoo, so if I become a Christian, I automatically get given treasure, and then I become a pirate?

Okay, maybe not, I'm being silly. But the point I am making is that you could easily misquote the Bible to your heart's content, as people do.

What is even worse is that the Bible has been translated and updated as many times as people feel they want to.

Back to Matthew 19:23

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to His disciples, “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, it is difficult for a rich man [who clings to possessions and status as security] to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I assure you that it will be very hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven."

"Then Jesus said to his disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven."

"Jesus said to his disciples, “I can guarantee this truth: It will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. "

"And Jesus said to his disciples, I say to you truth, for a rich man of hard shall enter into the kingdom of heavens. [Forsooth Jesus said to his disciples, Truly I say to you, for of hard a rich man shall enter into the realm of heavens.] "

Well, I've found a few different translations here. Which one do YOU believe?

Okay, most of these have a very similar meaning.

Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation

"
Five Mistakes in Your Bible Translation"

"In the original Hebrew, the 10th Commandment prohibits taking, not coveting."

The Bible, to get to you in English, has gone through how many translations? From Hebrew to Greek to what?

I've done translation, and I can see how hard it is.

"
Jesús dijo entonces a sus discípulos:

—Les aseguro que difícilmente entrará un rico en el reino de los cielos"

Spanish version of Matthew 19:23 (Or Mateo 19:23)

Jesus then said to his disciples, I assure you all how hard it is for a rich person entering into the kingdom of heaven.

Do you see how different my translation is to the others above?

So, what, exactly, is it that you believe? Which Bible version? Which translation? Why believe a translation as this has been written by man. Do you have a copy of the original Bible? Does anyone have a copy of the original Bible?

Would you include those parts of the Bible that were taken out?

Why were 14 books ripped out of the King James Bible in 1885? , page 1

Essentially, who do you believe?

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

No reason ancient manuscripts can't be considered documentation if they meet the same requirements as any other evidence. Using the Bible to prove the Bible doesn't work, but if you have other unrelated manuscripts that mention the same incidents, that might work. There are a lot of stories in the bible, so there should be a lot of manuscripts other than in the bible to prove they were real.

The word David has only been found once carved on a broken stele in modern day Syria. The stele says House of David.

And just how many times does it have to be mentioned to be significant?

 

[xband]

I could pick that apart, but I really don't have the time. Suffice it to say, the New Testament has more document evidence than any other ancient manuscript. Most of it dating from the first century, if I'm not mistaken. I believe that it is safe to say that God transmitted His word to us in it's entirety, and that it is accurate.

Great. I always hear about all that documented evidence, but so far, nobody has presented any of it to me, even though I ask. Care to give a list of your documented evidence?

I meant to say manuscript evidence.

No reason ancient manuscripts can't be considered documentation if they meet the same requirements as any other evidence. Using the Bible to prove the Bible doesn't work, but if you have other unrelated manuscripts that mention the same incidents, that might work. There are a lot of stories in the bible, so there should be a lot of manuscripts other than in the bible to prove they were real.

The word David has only been found once carved on a broken stele in modern day Syria. The stele says House of David.

And just how many times does it have to be mentioned to be significant?

Dated to three thousand years ago House of David is real. Once is good enough for me coming from that far back. The MLK stature will still be here three thousand years from now because it is made of granite, a very hard rock.