BREAKING: The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump..

[AZrailwhale]

No seriously

How Deep is the Deep State?
You claim they secretly run the Government

Show your math

They don’t secretly run the government, they openly do. The deep state is the army of unappointed, unregulated and unaccountable bureaucrats who run the country while the politicians blow hot air.

 

[blackhawk]

The court will probably rule that the President any President has immunity to a degree but not blanket immunity I really don't see how they could or would rule that the President has total immunity or no immunity.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Used to be

Now they are a partisan body projecting a Conservative agenda.
The same judges who proclaimed they would support judicial precedence have thrown out any decision that Conservatives oppose
Abortion, environmental protection, worker protections, Affirmative Action

No, unlike the reliably liberal previous courts, the current SCOTUS is ruling based upon the Constitution as they should. No legislation from the bench, no invented rights just reading the Constitution as the framers wrote it.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Who Israel?

More than 10,000 children have been killed by Israeli airstrikes and ground operations in Gaza in nearly 100 days of violence

And every one of them has been killed because Hamas hides behind civilians in violation of international law.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Listen to this! See what you think. This is what he thinks likely will happen..

BREAKING: The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump​

Great! So Joe can remove Trump permanently from the picture anytime there after then. Right?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's the only logical outcome to this political persecution.

So Biden can then remove Trump permanently from the equation Scot free. Right?

 

[BackAgain]

So Biden can then remove Trum

So Biden can then remove Trump permanently from the equation Scot free. Right?

Fakey. You’re a retard.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

ask Seth Rich.

Seth Rich but extra legal now. Right?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Fakey. You’re a retard.

Explain.
Absolute immunity is just that. No?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Even at the cost of 10,000 innocent children. I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm just trying to get you to be honest about the fact that you care as little for those children as HAMAS does. So why is it only they need to be wiped from this earth?

Capability for one. HAMAS doesn't have the capability of Nazi Germany. They're ability to inflict harm isn't so great that it needs to be mitigated at the cost of 10,000 innocent children. People who aren't deplorable mutants understand that without needing it explained to them.

The world would be better without home invaders too but if your solution was to land mine your property then the cost of the occasional mailman or child with an errant ball that rolls in your yard might seem like too steep a cost to your neighbors.

The only reason Hamas and Hezbollah haven’t killed fifty thousand Israeli children is because Israel has spent hundreds of millions building bomb-proof shelters and a SAM and anti- rocket defense unrivaled in modern warfare. During the same time Hamas has spent a half billion dollars of American and international aid money building rockets, tunnel networks and underground command facilities that it won’t allow Gazan civilians to shelter in. Hamas deliberately courts casualties among its own civilians to make Israel look bad.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You stupid fuckers are going to vote for Biden and Trump.

As opposed to whom?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Nixon was given a pardon. Obviously because he was LIABLE to be prosecuted

And of course the acceptance of a pardon is also a legal claim of guilt.

 

[BackAgain]

Explain.
Absolute immunity is just that. No?

No. You’re truly stupid.

It’s a misnomer. It confuses little mental pygmies like you.

Since it comes with preconditions (primarily that the action actually be within the ambit of the President’s Constitutional duties and authority), it isn’t really “absolute.” It is limited to being confined within those parameters.

So, again. No. A President (say Potato) cannot simply “remove” his opponent. It isn’t within the ambit of his Constitutional duties or authority.

 

[IM2]

Educate yourself.
I can't do it for you.

I now what they mean. You're trying to invent something in order to make excuses for Trump.

 

[DudleySmith]

There is NO DEEP STATE.

lol rubbish.

The Peanut gallery can begin with fraternity membership percentages of CEOs and national and state politicians in these.

Follow the money.

 

[DudleySmith]

Stupid or just full of leftist wishful thinking.

^^^Another Pot Calling The Kettle Black Moment on USMB.

 

[Smokin' OP]

A precedent has already been set for Trump to just ignore laws(immigration, Supreme Court rulings, etc) and do as his wishes and sic his DOJ on his political opponents via corrupt AGs and DTs around the country. Why stop at at one day? Oh wait, someone it is different when Biden does it.

You're delusional.
The Trump cult, of course, can't accept the fact their dear leader is a criminal.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Still has to go through the due process where people are innocent until proven guilty, so what is it that the Democrat's are scared of ??? Oh we know.

Then, bring on the charges!
What are teabaggers so afraid of?
Oh' we know.

 

[SeaMajor7]

You're delusional.
The Trump cult, of course, can't accept the fact their dear leader is a criminal.

CONVICTIONS: ZERO

 

[Smokin' OP]

CONVICTIONS: ZERO

They're coming.