'Palestinian'

Except for the territory that defines its sovereignty and the borders it defends to maintain that sovereignty.

Another of your failed attempts at trying to make a point.
Except that Israel still legally has no land. Just a military occupation.


Except that you can whine as you wish. Your legal opinions are taken with a chuckle.
It's true. Look it up.

Deflection.
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Deflection.

The angry Islamist thingy is a hoot.
 
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Hilarious from the guy who keeps saying "Israel has no land", despite mountains of evidence against that claim.
 
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Hilarious from the guy who keeps saying "Israel has no land", despite mountains of evidence against that claim.
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.

Indeed, funny. There is a thread dedicated to issues surrounding the creation of Israel where your whining about that event and your attempts to re-write history have been addressed repeatedly and tediously.
 
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as a legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone, create a government. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.

historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
 
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as a legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone, create a government. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.

historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
in the territory of Mandate Palestine.
The Mandate had no territory. It was a trustee.
 
The Mandate had no territory. It was a trustee.

Don't be daft. You are arguing for the pennies while the dollars escape you. We both know what territory we are talking about. Pick whatever nomenclature you want for it.

The Jewish people acquired the right to re-constitute their national homeland in THAT territory.
 
The Mandate had no territory. It was a trustee.

Don't be daft. You are arguing for the pennies while the dollars escape you. We both know what territory we are talking about. Pick whatever nomenclature you want for it.

The Jewish people acquired the right to re-constitute their national homeland in THAT territory.
We both know what territory we are talking about.
Indeed, it did not belong to the Mandate. They had no authority to give it away.
 
The Mandate had no territory. It was a trustee.

Don't be daft. You are arguing for the pennies while the dollars escape you. We both know what territory we are talking about. Pick whatever nomenclature you want for it.

The Jewish people acquired the right to re-constitute their national homeland in THAT territory.
We both know what territory we are talking about.
Indeed, it did not belong to the Mandate. They had no authority to give it away.
Indeed, the Mandatory did not give anything away. You're whining about something that didn't occur.

Indeed, you just like to whine. .
 
Indeed, it did not belong to the Mandate. They had no authority to give it away.

They had every right to divide the old Ottoman territory into new States. That's how ALL the States in the area were formed.
Indeed, and the people of each state became the citizens of their state. A state belongs to its citizens. They are the sovereigns of their territory.
 
The Tinmore Vortex strikes again. So your last several posts are absolutely meaningless. And we've come back full circle.

A State does belong to its citizens. The citizens are the sovereigns of their territory. That includes the JEWISH citizens.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the legal right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as had legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.


historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
 
The Tinmore Vortex strikes again. So your last several posts are absolutely meaningless. And we've come back full circle.

A State does belong to its citizens. The citizens are the sovereigns of their territory. That includes the JEWISH citizens.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the legal right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as had legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.


historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
Britain flopped in creating a Jewish National home and the UN flopped in creating a Jewish state. Neither of them had anything to do with the creation of Israel.
 
The Tinmore Vortex strikes again. So your last several posts are absolutely meaningless. And we've come back full circle.

A State does belong to its citizens. The citizens are the sovereigns of their territory. That includes the JEWISH citizens.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the legal right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as had legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.


historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
Britain flopped in creating a Jewish National home and the UN flopped in creating a Jewish state. Neither of them had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Obviously incorrect. The purpose of the Mandate was to reconstitute the Jewish National Home. That happened. The Mandate was fulfilled.

Your whining is for naught, except to make you feel better about your insensate Joooo hatreds.
 
The Tinmore Vortex strikes again. So your last several posts are absolutely meaningless. And we've come back full circle.

A State does belong to its citizens. The citizens are the sovereigns of their territory. That includes the JEWISH citizens.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the legal right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as had legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.


historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
Britain flopped in creating a Jewish National home and the UN flopped in creating a Jewish state. Neither of them had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Obviously incorrect. The purpose of the Mandate was to reconstitute the Jewish National Home. That happened. The Mandate was fulfilled.

Your whining is for naught, except to make you feel better about your insensate Joooo hatreds.
The creation of Israel was a unilateral move by the Zionists. It had nothing to do with the Mandate or the UN.
 
The Tinmore Vortex strikes again. So your last several posts are absolutely meaningless. And we've come back full circle.

A State does belong to its citizens. The citizens are the sovereigns of their territory. That includes the JEWISH citizens.

"Jewish National Homeland". The Jewish people acquired the legal right to re-constitute their national homeland in the territory of Mandate Palestine. They were one of the peoples in the Mandate territory and as such as had legal right to hold sovereignty. Indeed, they were the only peoples to acquire rights in that specific territory. Further, they realized that right, as required by the Mandate, by developing the ability to stand alone. And further, that right was recognized by the international community by acceptance into the UN and enter into diplomatic relations with other sovereign nations.


historical indigenous right + realization + recognition. Done deal. Get on with it.
Britain flopped in creating a Jewish National home and the UN flopped in creating a Jewish state. Neither of them had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Obviously incorrect. The purpose of the Mandate was to reconstitute the Jewish National Home. That happened. The Mandate was fulfilled.

Your whining is for naught, except to make you feel better about your insensate Joooo hatreds.
The creation of Israel was a unilateral move by the Zionists. It had nothing to do with the Mandate or the UN.

The inability of the Islamists to create an Islamist state was their unilateral failure.

Get a canoe and paddle down the de'Nile while crying a flood of crocodile tears.

You do realize that all of your whining in this thread and every other thread you spam, was the reason why there was a specific thread created for your incessant whining.
 
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Hilarious from the guy who keeps saying "Israel has no land", despite mountains of evidence against that claim.
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.
Not to worry; Israel, including its occupation of Palestinian Territories, is on borrowed time.
 
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Hilarious from the guy who keeps saying "Israel has no land", despite mountains of evidence against that claim.
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.
Not to worry; Israel, including its occupation of Palestinian Territories, is on borrowed time.

Pompous blathering from the Internet gee-hadee.
 
Britain flopped in creating a Jewish National home and the UN flopped in creating a Jewish state. Neither of them had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Duh. Neither had the ability to create a State. That's why I didn't bring them up.

The only reason you bring them up is because somehow, weirdly, you think that if you bring them up and prove that they were ineffective at doing something that they had no legal power to do, and actually failed to do what it was that they had no legal power to do, that Israel is just a figment of the world's imagination. Its Tinmore Vortex at its finest.
 
Of course you won't look it up. The one thing that is consistent about Zionists is that they refuse to learn anything. It shows in their posts.

Hilarious from the guy who keeps saying "Israel has no land", despite mountains of evidence against that claim.
Funny, show me one piece of evidence that Israel legally acquired any land.
Not to worry; Israel, including its occupation of Palestinian Territories, is on borrowed time.

Why do you say that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top