Obama has an epiphany. Finally admits we are at war.

Watch and see what happens if, god forbid...there is another attack and it's successful.

You can't hide it. Your hate. You wish for a terrorist attack because you hate obama more than you care about americans or solving problems.

What a douchebag thing to say. Considering the source, such douchebag posts are not unexpected.

But some examples of bent tight's enormous capacity for being a mega-douche are worse than others.

Some things just are never going to change.
 
You can't hide it. Your hate. You wish for a terrorist attack because you hate obama more than you care about americans or solving problems.

What a douchebag thing to say. Considering the source, such douchebag posts are not unexpected.

But some examples of bent tight's enormous capacity for being a mega-douche are worse than others.

Some things just are never going to change.

That's true. You will always folllow me (and a few "select" others) around to add your typically douchey comments.
 
i don't understand...ravi claimed her link proved republicans lied that obama stopped using the war on terror....however, a brief view of her link shows obama did in fact stop using "war"......

his speech yesterday was the first time in a long time, if ever....

ravi actually proved republicans didn't lie....all obama kept saying was terrorism....not we are at war....
Obviously you only watched the portion at the beginning...of the Republican talking heads.

But thanks for the rep!

lol.....two times he mentions "war" in an entire year and that somehow debunks that obama hardly, if ever, talks about the "war" on terror....he basically stopped talking about it as war....his sec def expressly states he has stopped using war on terror term....good lord, wake up ravi....you just thoroughly embarrassed yourself

Obama administration ditches 'war on terror' phrase

Obama administration ditches 'war on terror' phrase - Los Angeles Times

obama stops using "war" on terror - Google Search

:lol:

i really appreciate the laughs this morning ravi, thats why i gave you rep, for mindlessly posting drivel from the dailykos without first checking it yourself....
 
Watch and see what happens if, god forbid...there is another attack and it's successful.

Oh now it's god forbid.. Your side used the terror attack 911 as a political football. This kind of commentary is as contemptible as it was back then. You don't know how voters are reacting to anything, you just know how Neocon Repubs are reacting.

Maybe you'll be surprised once again in November.

Bullcrap.

YOUR side used the terror attack as a political weapon. We all lived through it and witnessed it.

We got attacked. The BUSH Administration chose to react. YOUR SIDE then libeled and slandered and slimed him unmercifully from a point not too long after 9/11 (your side only held off that long because you politically calculated that any sooner might back fire on you) and persisted until his second term was over. No. Wait. Your side contined even after that.

Any effort by the Bush Adminsitration to justify what they were doing HAD to make some reference to the 9/11 attacks, yet every reference to the 9/11 attacks BY the Bush Adminsitration became a bullshit excuse for YOUR SIDE to dishonestly claim, "See? They're tying to politicize 9/11 !!"

YOUR SIDE was blithely DOING the very thing you falsely accused the Bush Adminsitration (and supporters) of doing.

Yes. YOUR SIDE IS JUST THAT hypocritical.

If it was just a matter of going into Afghanistan and finding Bin Laden, all that you say here might have some validity.

What Bush/Cheney/Rove did was to lie about our reasons for leaving the war on terror and going into Iraq.

Bush did use the war as a political football and he used reacting to 911 as one as well.
 
Last edited:
Oh now it's god forbid.. Your side used the terror attack 911 as a political football. This kind of commentary is as contemptible as it was back then. You don't know how voters are reacting to anything, you just know how Neocon Repubs are reacting.

Maybe you'll be surprised once again in November.

Bullcrap.

YOUR side used the terror attack as a political weapon. We all lived through it and witnessed it.

We got attacked. The BUSH Administration chose to react. YOUR SIDE then libeled and slandered and slimed him unmercifully from a point not too long after 9/11 (your side only held off that long because you politically calculated that any sooner might back fire on you) and persisted until his second term was over. No. Wait. Your side contined even after that.

Any effort by the Bush Adminsitration to justify what they were doing HAD to make some reference to the 9/11 attacks, yet every reference to the 9/11 attacks BY the Bush Adminsitration became a bullshit excuse for YOUR SIDE to dishonestly claim, "See? They're tying to politicize 9/11 !!"

YOUR SIDE was blithely DOING the very thing you falsely accused the Bush Adminsitration (and supporters) of doing.

Yes. YOUR SIDE IS JUST THAT hypocritical.

If it was just a matter of going into Afghanistan and finding Bin Laden, all that you say here might have some validity.

What Bush/Cheney/Rove did was to lie about our reasons for leaving the war on terror and going into Irac

Bush did use the war as a political football and he used reacting to 911 as one as well.

This new guy went into Afghanistan, silly. And guess what? STill no bin fucking Laden.

No. The President did not lie about our reasons for going into Iraq. Nor did the Vice President. Nor did my old boss -- errr -- I mean, that is uhmmm, neither did Mr. Rove.

The CLAIM itself is just dishonest and oft-refuted cheesey lib political rhetoric. Nothing more. But constantly MAKING the claim (notwithstanding the fact that it's untrue) was a version of politicizing the war and the aftermath of the 9/11 atrocities.

No. President Bush never used the war or 9/11 as a political footballs. Repeating that dishonest set of claims will never suffice to make them anything other than the cheesey liberal lies they have always been and always will be.
 
i don't understand...ravi claimed her link proved republicans lied that obama stopped using the war on terror....however, a brief view of her link shows obama did in fact stop using "war"......

his speech yesterday was the first time in a long time, if ever....

ravi actually proved republicans didn't lie....all obama kept saying was terrorism....not we are at war....
Obviously you only watched the portion at the beginning...of the Republican talking heads.

But thanks for the rep!

lol.....two times he mentions "war" in an entire year and that somehow debunks that obama hardly, if ever, talks about the "war" on terror....he basically stopped talking about it as war....his sec def expressly states he has stopped using war on terror term....good lord, wake up ravi....you just thoroughly embarrassed yourself

Obama administration ditches 'war on terror' phrase

Obama administration ditches 'war on terror' phrase - Los Angeles Times

obama stops using "war" on terror - Google Search

:lol:

i really appreciate the laughs this morning ravi, thats why i gave you rep, for mindlessly posting drivel from the dailykos without first checking it yourself....

Daily Kos and

Overseas contigency operation :lol: 2 laughs in 1 :lol:
 
Obama's never admitted that we are at war except for all those times that he said we are at war ....
 
Obama's never admitted that we are at war except for all those times that he said we are at war ....

(AP) The phrase "global war on terror" is finished, at least as far as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is concerned.

The top U.S. diplomat told reporters Tuesday that the Obama administration has quit using that line to describe the effort to fight terrorism around the world.

Clinton: Term "War On Terror" Is History - CBS News
 
Isn't it precious how they are reduced to counting how many times Obama has said the word "war"? :lol:

its even more precious when hacks like ravi claim he didn't stop using the term war on terror and gives links to where he allegedly keeps saying it when in reality it is only two times out over two dozen speeches and a whole year....and its even funnier when hillary clinton said last march that the term "war on terror" will no longer be used....

are you calling hillary a liar?
 
Watch and see what happens if, god forbid...there is another attack and it's successful.

You can't hide it. Your hate. You wish for a terrorist attack because you hate obama more than you care about americans or solving problems.

What a douchebag thing to say. Considering the source, such douchebag posts are not unexpected.

But some examples of bent tight's enormous capacity for being a mega-douche are worse than others.

You have absolutely no imagination. Either stop whining or find a way to make it entertaining.
 
Obama's never admitted that we are at war except for all those times that he said we are at war ....

(AP) The phrase "global war on terror" is finished, at least as far as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is concerned.

The top U.S. diplomat told reporters Tuesday that the Obama administration has quit using that line to describe the effort to fight terrorism around the world.

Clinton: Term "War On Terror" Is History - CBS News

So?
 
Isn't it precious how they are reduced to counting how many times Obama has said the word "war"? :lol:

Actually, no.

It's pathetic that you are reduced to trying to get the mocking exposure of what a massive fraud he is in such a plodding ineffectual way.

I'm sure a person of your severely limited intellectual ability is unable to stop and contemplate something like an implication.

But there are many implications in the fact that the President was so unable and/or unwilling to put the WORD to what was happening.
 
Obama's never admitted that we are at war except for all those times that he said we are at war ....

(AP) The phrase "global war on terror" is finished, at least as far as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is concerned.

The top U.S. diplomat told reporters Tuesday that the Obama administration has quit using that line to describe the effort to fight terrorism around the world.

Clinton: Term "War On Terror" Is History - CBS News

What term is Barry using these days? 'Clashing with bad guys'? 'Taking on terrorists'? (oh wait, terrorist isn't pc). Um . . . . 'Shooting at subversives'?
 
You can't hide it. Your hate. You wish for a terrorist attack because you hate obama more than you care about americans or solving problems.

What a douchebag thing to say. Considering the source, such douchebag posts are not unexpected.

But some examples of bent tight's enormous capacity for being a mega-douche are worse than others.

You have absolutely no imagination. Either stop whining or find a way to make it entertaining.

bent tight: you still have nothing and it is quite well documented. With every post you shout it from the mountain tops, "CurveLight is a FAIL!"

Thanks for playing.

:clap2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top