Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's cute how these Hillary cultists believe Mormons are somehow crazier than they are when they're far more looney than any Mormon is, isn't it? Hilarious stuff.
Right, because believing in magic underwear and ruling your own planet in the afterlife is a lot more sane than thinking that Hillary is more qualified to be president than a game show host.
So Mormons love abortion and hate gun ownership?Evan McMullin Is Surging in Utah
Even is also not in second in Idaho ahead of Clinton. No alot of polling there so there isn't a clear picture on whether his numbers have momentum there. But there is some energy with this campaign.
Pollsters are also going to start asking about him in Minnesota. It may be more difficult but a win here hers Hillary and increases the odds of the 12th amendment being invoked
lolEvan McMullin Is Surging in Utah
Even is also not in second in Idaho ahead of Clinton. No alot of polling there so there isn't a clear picture on whether his numbers have momentum there. But there is some energy with this campaign.
Pollsters are also going to start asking about him in Minnesota. It may be more difficult but a win here hers Hillary and increases the odds of the 12th amendment being invoked
So he has a shot at maybe 6 electoral votes? However, he still has an outside chance of winning, actually, however remote, if the vote goes to Congress in the event of an electoral college deadlock, true enough.
Even is also not in second in Idaho ahead of Clinton. No alot of polling there so there isn't a clear picture on whether his numbers have momentum there. But there is some energy with this campaign.
Pollsters are also going to start asking about him in Minnesota. It may be more difficult but a win here hers Hillary and increases the odds of the 12th amendment being invoked
If McMullin takes Utah, it just means Hillary will take just about everything else.
Hillary already has 260 EV's locked down, and she only has to win one of the following states.
Florida
Ohio
Minnesota
North Carolina
Arizona
Georgia
I think she's going win all of them. I think we are looking at the complete collapse of Trump and she's going to pick up states that weren't even on anyone's radar, like Texas and Indiana.
You mean like the voters Perot got?It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
Well, I'll take pretty much anything at this point....You mean like the voters Perot got?It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
The fact that this clown joe here thinks Patrick Buchanan is a nazi tells us all we need to know about his sanity,grasp on reality and knowledge of politics.It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
Not really.
The problem with third parties is that the people who vote for them and run on them tend to be goofs.
Let's review our most successful "Third Party" Candidates.
2000 - Pat Buchanan- Nazi and Ralph Nader - Hippy Nut
1992 & 1996- Ross Perot - Crazy person who thought the government was out to get him.
1980- John Anderson- Lost as a Republican, took his ball and went home.
1968- George Wallace- Racist
1948 - Strom Thurmond - Racist and Henry Wallace- Communist
seeing a pattern here? The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway. Usually, they are people who are rejected by their own parties for being so far outside the mainstream.
Now Gary Johnson will probably do well enough to qualify for Matching Funds, which I think is hilarious. The guy who runs on "all gummit bad" platform will be taking a government handout that the major parties don't use anymore because they limit the real parties from running effective campaigns
The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway.It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
Not really.
The problem with third parties is that the people who vote for them and run on them tend to be goofs.
Let's review our most successful "Third Party" Candidates.
2000 - Pat Buchanan- Nazi and Ralph Nader - Hippy Nut
1992 & 1996- Ross Perot - Crazy person who thought the government was out to get him.
1980- John Anderson- Lost as a Republican, took his ball and went home.
1968- George Wallace- Racist
1948 - Strom Thurmond - Racist and Henry Wallace- Communist
seeing a pattern here? The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway. Usually, they are people who are rejected by their own parties for being so far outside the mainstream.
Now Gary Johnson will probably do well enough to qualify for Matching Funds, which I think is hilarious. The guy who runs on "all gummit bad" platform will be taking a government handout that the major parties don't use anymore because they limit the real parties from running effective campaigns
Their obedient fans are just tickled, though....The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway.It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
Not really.
The problem with third parties is that the people who vote for them and run on them tend to be goofs.
Let's review our most successful "Third Party" Candidates.
2000 - Pat Buchanan- Nazi and Ralph Nader - Hippy Nut
1992 & 1996- Ross Perot - Crazy person who thought the government was out to get him.
1980- John Anderson- Lost as a Republican, took his ball and went home.
1968- George Wallace- Racist
1948 - Strom Thurmond - Racist and Henry Wallace- Communist
seeing a pattern here? The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway. Usually, they are people who are rejected by their own parties for being so far outside the mainstream.
Now Gary Johnson will probably do well enough to qualify for Matching Funds, which I think is hilarious. The guy who runs on "all gummit bad" platform will be taking a government handout that the major parties don't use anymore because they limit the real parties from running effective campaigns
you mean like hillary and trump?....lots of people dont want these 2 anywhere near the WH....
So Mormons love abortion and hate gun ownership?Evan McMullin Is Surging in Utah
Even is also not in second in Idaho ahead of Clinton. No alot of polling there so there isn't a clear picture on whether his numbers have momentum there. But there is some energy with this campaign.
Pollsters are also going to start asking about him in Minnesota. It may be more difficult but a win here hers Hillary and increases the odds of the 12th amendment being invoked
those party people always are....Their obedient fans are just tickled, though....The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway.It would be great to see a third party candidate grab a few EVs. Anything to start a momentum to break up the duopoly.
Not really.
The problem with third parties is that the people who vote for them and run on them tend to be goofs.
Let's review our most successful "Third Party" Candidates.
2000 - Pat Buchanan- Nazi and Ralph Nader - Hippy Nut
1992 & 1996- Ross Perot - Crazy person who thought the government was out to get him.
1980- John Anderson- Lost as a Republican, took his ball and went home.
1968- George Wallace- Racist
1948 - Strom Thurmond - Racist and Henry Wallace- Communist
seeing a pattern here? The kind of people who can't find a home in one of the two major parties aren't the kind of people you'd ever want running things, anyway. Usually, they are people who are rejected by their own parties for being so far outside the mainstream.
Now Gary Johnson will probably do well enough to qualify for Matching Funds, which I think is hilarious. The guy who runs on "all gummit bad" platform will be taking a government handout that the major parties don't use anymore because they limit the real parties from running effective campaigns
you mean like hillary and trump?....lots of people dont want these 2 anywhere near the WH....
.
There's an odd, hardly likely scenario where McMullin could take Utah and leave Hillary at 268 and Trump at 264.
lolEvan McMullin Is Surging in Utah
Even is also not in second in Idaho ahead of Clinton. No alot of polling there so there isn't a clear picture on whether his numbers have momentum there. But there is some energy with this campaign.
Pollsters are also going to start asking about him in Minnesota. It may be more difficult but a win here hers Hillary and increases the odds of the 12th amendment being invoked
So he has a shot at maybe 6 electoral votes? However, he still has an outside chance of winning, actually, however remote, if the vote goes to Congress in the event of an electoral college deadlock, true enough.
No, he doesn’t.
If McMullin wins Utah that will be six less EC votes for Trump, who will lose the election to Clinton anyway.
