Judge Orders Christian to pay Homo for using “Inappropriate” Bible verse

[daws101]

apparently this street preacher is someone who loves to preach to homos and tell them they are going to rot in hell. This should not be happening on street corners. that is what churches are for

Sorry, that's what the First Amendment is for. You can't just restrict religious speech to the confines of a Church. Why do such things even cross your mind?

bullshit! the first amendment doesn't even hint at your non sense.. " Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."-
what you are ignorantly misrepresenting is two separate statements.
that amendment doesn't give a rat's ass about public displays of religion AKA street preaching etc.
it's a tradition that goes back thousands of years..
it's not a matter of discrimination but discretion..
ass hat's like you have no clue to the difference.

 

[daws101]

News flash: There is no 'First Amendment' in the UK.

false..

United Kingdom[edit]
See also: Censorship in the United Kingdom

The Bill of Rights 1689 grants the parliamentary privilege for freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament and is still in effect.
United Kingdom citizens have a negative right to freedom of expression under the common law.[120] In 1998, the United Kingdom incorporated the European Convention, and the guarantee of freedom of expression it contains in Article 10, into its domestic law under the Human Rights Act. However there is a broad sweep of exceptions including threatening, abusive or insulting words or behavior intending or likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress or cause a breach of the peace (which has been used to prohibit racist speech targeted at individuals),[121][122][123] sending another any article which is indecent or grossly offensive with an intent to cause distress or anxiety (which has been used to prohibit speech of a racist or anti-religious nature),[124][125][126] incitement,[127] incitement to racial hatred,[128] incitement to religious hatred, incitement to terrorism including encouragement of terrorism and dissemination of terrorist publications,[127][129][130] glorifying terrorism,[131][132][133] collection or possession of a document or record containing information likely to be of use to a terrorist,[134][135]

 

[daws101]

He was a street preacher and they are the worst. The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Hey dumb ass, the homo approached the preacher looking for a debate. You fail

Why dont you seek out and post the other side of the story?

Like.. you know, read the actual grievance.

she not interested in the facts just gay bashing..

X I disagree.

why am I not surprised ....

 

[TemplarKormac]

Very nice, daws.

(yawns)

 

[Moonglow]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

 

[daws101]

Very nice, daws.

(yawns)

thanks! (knowing full well Templar doormat had no clue and didn't read any of the post , how could he? multisyllabic words are passed his 3rd grade reading level!

 

[daws101]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

 

[Moonglow]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

Yet he did not advocate hate of the sinner...

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

Yet he did not advocate hate of the sinner...

Certainly true. About 90% of what liberals claim is hating someone is not though.

 

[daws101]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

 

[koshergrl]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

Read the bible, it's in there.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

Sin is pretty self explanatory.

Did you or did not claim that Jesus was not anti anything?

 

[daws101]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

Yet he did not advocate hate of the sinner...

Certainly true. About 90% of what liberals claim is hating someone is not though.

hate is the forte of the right...

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

Yet he did not advocate hate of the sinner...

Certainly true. About 90% of what liberals claim is hating someone is not though.

hate is the forte of the right...

wrong

Hate is the forte of the narrow minded bigots. Who exist on both the left and the right.

You sir are a narrow minded left wing hateful bigot. I feel sorry for you, being trapped in a little bubble where you believe only one side can ever be right must be a sad existence.

 

[Moonglow]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

anything that transgresses the will or law of God...

 

[daws101]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

Read the bible, it's in there.

I have. more times than you...and if you were as up on the bible as you pretend you know the definition of sin changes with almost every book in the bible it's mentioned in..
you can go back to your favorite abortion porn site now

 

[Moonglow]

Jesus said he was not changing any of the old laws and only had one law to give,,,Love.....They neighbor as you love yourself, love you enemies and pray for them.....I didn't say refuse to love because they did something you don't like or think is wrong.. He spoke of,,unconditional Love....How can you treat someone with Love by refusing them for the sin they commit, unless you are free of sin yourself,,, you can't....

 

[daws101]

I always heard that the Old Testament is for the Jews and the New Testament was for the Christians, why was this guy quoting Old Testament...That's where he went wrong...

"Christians" only use Leviticus (The Book of Leviticus is the third book of the Hebrew Bible, and the third of five books of the Torah.)
to bolster their bigotry and other hatred and ignorance.
Jesus was supposed to change all that.

Jesus was not anti- anything.
He taught love for everybody, acceptance of everybody and do onto others as you would have them do unto you.

It is the interpretation of bible quotes that has Christians quoting anti - every interprets their own way

Pretty sure Jesus was anti sin bruh.

define sin.... deewb

Sin is pretty self explanatory.

Did you or did not claim that Jesus was not anti anything?

not a claim, it's fact as far as anything in the bible can be considered fact.
when a book has silly shit like this: " Bringing unauthorised fire before God" in it ,than all of it is questionable

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Jesus said he was not changing any of the old laws and only had one law to give,,,Love.....They neighbor as you love yourself, love you enemies and pray for them.....I didn't say refuse to love because they did something you don't like or think is wrong.. He spoke of,,unconditional Love....How can you treat someone with Love by refusing them for the sin they commit, unless you are free of sin yourself,,, you can't....

Loving someone doesn't mean you have to do business with them LOL I have several distant family members I love, but I'd never do business with them.