Joe Scarborough Slams Mitt Romney Welfare Ads: 'It's Just Completely False' (VIDEO)

Political Junky

Gold Member
May 27, 2009
25,793
3,990
280
Joe Scarborough Slams Mitt Romney Welfare Ads: 'It's Just Completely False' (VIDEO)

On Tuesday's edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, host Joe Scarborough laced into Mitt Romney's camp over a lineup of welfare ads that repeat a false claim against President Barack Obama.

"I've been looking for a week-and-a-half to try to figure out the basis of this welfare reform ad," Scarborough said. "I've scoured the Wall Street Journal editorial pages … the ad's completely false. It's just completely false."
 
The Governor's Statement:

"Under Obama’s plan (for welfare), you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job. They just send you your welfare check."
Mitt Romney on Monday, August 6th, 2012 in a campaign ad




From Factcheck.org

A Mitt Romney TV ad claims the Obama administration has adopted “a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements.” The plan does neither of those things.

Work requirements are not simply being “dropped.” States may now change the requirements — revising, adding or eliminating them — as part of a federally approved state-specific plan to increase job placement.
And it won’t “gut” the 1996 law to ease the requirement. Benefits still won’t be paid beyond an allotted time, whether the recipient is working or not.
Romney’s ad also distorts the facts when it says that under President Obama’s plan “you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job.” The law never required all welfare recipients to work. Only 29 percent of those receiving cash assistance met the work requirement by the time President Obama took office.

From Politifcat.com

The ad’s claim is not accurate, and it inflames old resentments about able-bodied adults sitting around collecting public assistance. Pants on Fire!

Scarborough isn't the only one.
 
But but Obama said we just want dirty air and dirty water... and and we just want to throw gramms off a cliff.... Booosh!!!

Yep.... you morons really do care about facts dont ya
:eusa_clap:
 
Last edited:
Romney seems confident that his supporters will believe anything he says with no thought of seeking other opinions.
 
Oh great now Poitifact and factcheck are against repubs too! That make number of people against repubicans eleventy...you paranoid fools
 
The Governor's Statement:

"Under Obama’s plan (for welfare), you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job. They just send you your welfare check."
Mitt Romney on Monday, August 6th, 2012 in a campaign ad




From Factcheck.org

A Mitt Romney TV ad claims the Obama administration has adopted “a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements.” The plan does neither of those things.

Work requirements are not simply being “dropped.” States may now change the requirements — revising, adding or eliminating them — as part of a federally approved state-specific plan to increase job placement.
And it won’t “gut” the 1996 law to ease the requirement. Benefits still won’t be paid beyond an allotted time, whether the recipient is working or not.
Romney’s ad also distorts the facts when it says that under President Obama’s plan “you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job.” The law never required all welfare recipients to work. Only 29 percent of those receiving cash assistance met the work requirement by the time President Obama took office.

From Politifcat.com

The ad’s claim is not accurate, and it inflames old resentments about able-bodied adults sitting around collecting public assistance. Pants on Fire!

Scarborough isn't the only one.

Hey! Don't muddy up the water with facts! The oppo wants to hate Obama and believe every lie Romney tells! And THEY are actually going to vote in November!:eek::ack-1: And it doesn't matter if you show them the actual statute and state corresponding info directly from the archives, they will sitll say they don't believe a single thing MSNBC and other of their hated media says (even if true).:D
 
The Governor's Statement:

"Under Obama’s plan (for welfare), you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job. They just send you your welfare check."
Mitt Romney on Monday, August 6th, 2012 in a campaign ad




From Factcheck.org

A Mitt Romney TV ad claims the Obama administration has adopted “a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements.” The plan does neither of those things.

Work requirements are not simply being “dropped.” States may now change the requirements — revising, adding or eliminating them — as part of a federally approved state-specific plan to increase job placement.
And it won’t “gut” the 1996 law to ease the requirement. Benefits still won’t be paid beyond an allotted time, whether the recipient is working or not.
Romney’s ad also distorts the facts when it says that under President Obama’s plan “you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job.” The law never required all welfare recipients to work. Only 29 percent of those receiving cash assistance met the work requirement by the time President Obama took office.

From Politifcat.com

The ad’s claim is not accurate, and it inflames old resentments about able-bodied adults sitting around collecting public assistance. Pants on Fire!

Scarborough isn't the only one.

Hey! Don't muddy up the water with facts! The oppo wants to hate Obama and believe every lie Romney tells! And THEY are actually going to vote in November!:eek::ack-1: And it doesn't matter if you show them the actual statute and state corresponding info directly from the archives, they will sitll say they don't believe a single thing MSNBC and other of their hated media says (even if true).:D

The old saying I heard about lawyers seems appropriate:

When the witness is against you; pound the facts.
When the facts are against you; pound the witness.
When they are both against you; pound the table.

I'm sure the profanity laden retort would be coming if this were the afternoon and most of the GOP posters here weren't already in a booze induced stupor.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top