If Racial Dominance Were Reversed...

Would Blacks Seek Equality for Whites?


  • Total voters
    15
If Africa had gone through an Age of Reason and/or Enlightenment based on what we call a "Western Judeo-Christian" philosophy, I don't see why not.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.

And yet a site like this proves otherwise:

http://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/black-billionaires/

Taking America as an example, the Black population did not achieve anything close to equal status with the White population until the late 1960's. With equivalent education and societal support, Black people can achieve as much as if not more than white people. It's down to individual talent and life chances not skin colour.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.

And yet a site like this proves otherwise:

http://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/black-billionaires/

Taking America as an example, the Black population did not achieve anything close to equal status with the White population until the late 1960's. With equivalent education and societal support, Black people can achieve as much as if not more than white people. It's down to individual talent and life chances not skin colour.
I have never seen that anywhere in the world where whites and blacks cohabitate. Equal status has been given to blacks globally de jure, but they have been unable to achieve equal status de facto.

As to the OPs question, no. Whites would still dominate.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.

And yet a site like this proves otherwise:

http://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/black-billionaires/

Taking America as an example, the Black population did not achieve anything close to equal status with the White population until the late 1960's. With equivalent education and societal support, Black people can achieve as much as if not more than white people. It's down to individual talent and life chances not skin colour.

No one said it was skin color that keeps them from "achieving".
It isn't skin color that causes them to commit more crimes, have more illegitimate babies, take more welfare, drop out of school.

After over 50 years of "civil rights", "blacks" have more opportunity than whites to "succeed" due to repressive, anti white government laws that favor minorities.

Save all the irrelevant black propaganda from black run websites. I'm not interested.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.

And yet a site like this proves otherwise:

http://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/black-billionaires/

Taking America as an example, the Black population did not achieve anything close to equal status with the White population until the late 1960's. With equivalent education and societal support, Black people can achieve as much as if not more than white people. It's down to individual talent and life chances not skin colour.

No one said it was skin color that keeps them from "achieving".
It isn't skin color that causes them to commit more crimes, have more illegitimate babies, take more welfare, drop out of school.

After over 50 years of "civil rights", "blacks" have more opportunity than whites to "succeed" due to repressive, anti white government laws that favor minorities.

Save all the irrelevant black propaganda from black run websites. I'm not interested.

Actually I would submit that were it not for laws put in place in society by white lawmakers, the Blacks would soon murder one another out of existence.
 
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character"...and as all collected data by the FBI, DOJ, BJS, CDC, DOE, shows; disproportionate crime rates, unemployment rates, dropout rates, welfare rates, illegitimate birth rates...etc...negroes are in the "lead" in every category.

The "content of their character" has been found severely lacking by modern standards.

And yet a site like this proves otherwise:

http://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/black-billionaires/

Taking America as an example, the Black population did not achieve anything close to equal status with the White population until the late 1960's. With equivalent education and societal support, Black people can achieve as much as if not more than white people. It's down to individual talent and life chances not skin colour.

No one said it was skin color that keeps them from "achieving".
It isn't skin color that causes them to commit more crimes, have more illegitimate babies, take more welfare, drop out of school.

After over 50 years of "civil rights", "blacks" have more opportunity than whites to "succeed" due to repressive, anti white government laws that favor minorities.

Save all the irrelevant black propaganda from black run websites. I'm not interested.


If you are not interested in views, facts or positions that differ from yours, why ask the question in the first place? If roles were reversed, surely white people would be in a position that meant they "commit more crimes, have more illegitimate babies, take more welfare, drop out of school." Human beings are human beings, as you say skin colour is irrelevant.
 
If you are not interested in views, facts or positions that differ from yours, why ask the question in the first place?

Using an afro centric website as a "source" isn't reliable.


If roles were reversed, surely white people would be in a position that meant they "commit more crimes, have more illegitimate babies, take more welfare, drop out of school."

LMAO...
You create a fantasy scenario of people who don't exist and assign them imaginary actions so that the "result" supports your fantasy argument.
In other words, bullshit.

Human beings are human beings, as you say skin colour is irrelevant.
I didn't say skin color is irrelevant.
I said their skin color isn't what white people dislike about them.
Are you saying that, since we're all "human", the only differences between the races is "skin color"
 
As the world becomes more civilized and more ethnically diverse, terms like "racial dominance" will likely become obsolete, however the answer to this question could be proven one way or another in the foreseeable future.

According to census trends in this country, the white population will no longer be the majority within this century, and we already know that the black population never has been, and considering the history of how blacks arrived here, and the fact that out of their 250 year presence on American soil, about 50 of those years have been spent as people with all the legal rights of real citizens, it is highly debatable as to how much and who within the white population has really strived for their equality.

Most history books that are truth based, very accurately outline that there in fact has been a small percentage of whites who have been champions for the rights of ALL people, and when decency, civil progress, and above all, the need to preserve the rest of the worlds perception of the American "freedom model" the rest of the population begrudgingly followed.

That being stated, America is NOT a "black and white" country anymore, and when whites eventually become a part of the minority, history could repeat itself, and the so called "racial dominance" of whites could come to a close.

Then we will see how whoever the majority is at that time handles their newly found "dominance".
 
Last edited:
Not sure skin colour has anything to do with this, surely it's more about culture, education, religion, etc?
"skin color"? It's not "skin color" that white people dislike.
It's the "culture".
We've judged "blacks" not on "the color of their skin, but the content of their character".....

The problem is the lack of content in the character of transparent douchebags like you and skinhead swaggy.

:rolleyes:
 
I have never seen that anywhere in the world where whites and blacks cohabitate. ...


Yes you have.
Tell me where in the world blacks have equal or higher socioeconomic status where they live with whites, Asians or pretty much any other group. It is not even in Africa, let alone the rest of the world. Without Asc's flights of fantasy please.
 

Forum List

Back
Top