Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My point was that there are plenty of inane, obscure laws still on the books that, if enforced, would make Allred's head spin.
re: blue laws ...
As a conservative and all that, don't you believe a private business should be allowed to choose if they remain open on Sunday? Why should government force them to close ?
My point was that there are plenty of inane, obscure laws still on the books that, if enforced, would make Allred's head spin.
To Emma: I got your point.
re: blue laws ...
As a conservative and all that, don't you believe a private business should be allowed to choose if they remain open on Sunday? Why should government force them to close ?
To Emma: Few Americans objected to retail stores doing business on Sundays. It was liberals attacking blue laws that were rarely enforced that made them such hypocrites. The history of the 20th century shows that Socialists simply wanted to replace a Christian societys blue laws with more stringent laws of their own. They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams not only in writing socialisms laws but in enforcing them as well.
My point was that there are plenty of inane, obscure laws still on the books that, if enforced, would make Allred's head spin.
To Emma: I got your point.
re: blue laws ...
As a conservative and all that, don't you believe a private business should be allowed to choose if they remain open on Sunday? Why should government force them to close ?
To Emma: Few Americans objected to retail stores doing business on Sundays. It was liberals attacking blue laws that were rarely enforced that made them such hypocrites. The history of the 20th century shows that Socialists simply wanted to replace a Christian societys blue laws with more stringent laws of their own. They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams not only in writing socialisms laws but in enforcing them as well.
That really doesn't address my question to you ...
Uhh, I don't get your point.
Unless your point is that "free speech" means liberals aren't allowed to criticize Rush Limbaugh.
Sorry, but where in the 1st amendment does it say you're allowed to say no one is allowed to complain about Rush Limbaugh's speech?
To OooPooPahDoo: You have no business responding if you dont understand the difference between criminalizing political speech and simply criticizing Rush. Im not going to explain it to you.
??? Really? Would you kindly just listen to your morning DJ show and not post here in the future?
To OooPooPahDoo: Better still, do not read my messages. Or is it that you do not want anyone reading them?
Nobody has criminalized Rush's speech.
********************************************Your issue is with the Florida state legislature, not Allred.
To C_Clayton_Jones: My issue is with liberals trying to criminalize speech. So-called hate speech is ludicrous. The most offensive speech requires the most protection. No doubt, liberals will increase hate speech infractions; so Id make touchy-feely speech a hate crime in order to restore fairness.
Hate crimes are a bigger travesty than is hate speech. A crime is a crime. Codifying Hate crimes is discriminatory in that it makes one victim more important than another in the eyes of the law. If ever the slippery slope argument was applicable it is in convicting an accused defendant based on their motive. The recent conviction of Dharun Ravi is a case in point:
The most serious charges bias intimidation based on sexual orientation, a hate crime carry up to 10 years in prison each. Legal experts said the most Ravi would probably get all together at sentencing May 21 would be 10 years.
The next excerpt shows that the law is already halfway down the slippery slope:
Ravi was not charged with causing Clementi's death, and the suicide remained largely in the background at the trial, though some witnesses mentioned it and the jury was told Clementi had taken his life. Prosecutors were not allowed to argue directly that the spying led to his death; defense lawyers were barred from saying there were other reasons he killed himself.
Former Rutgers student convicted in webcam case
By GEOFF MULVIHILL | Associated Press 18 hrs ago
Former Rutgers student convicted in webcam case - Yahoo! News
The entire case stinks to high heaven. Only an idiot would believe that Ravis motive was not the critical factor in his conviction:
. . . defense lawyers were barred from saying there were other reasons he killed himself.
Rush gets slammed by the Left all of the time.
To OooPooPahDoo: You have no business responding if you dont understand the difference between criminalizing political speech and simply criticizing Rush. Im not going to explain it to you.
To OooPooPahDoo: Better still, do not read my messages. Or is it that you do not want anyone reading them?
Nobody has criminalized Rush's speech.
Of course not. However, the Rush apologists choose to characterize the highly deserved criticism which is being heaped upon this cretin as such.
Sandra Fluke made herself a public figure...
that is debatable. are Sarah Palin's children public figures because they went on stage and camera?
Stop being an ass. Rush is a grown man who needs to straighten out his mind. After years of drug use hi addled brain needs cleansing
Sandra Fluke made herself a public figure...
that is debatable. are Sarah Palin's children public figures because they went on stage and camera?
Stop being an ass. Rush is a grown man who needs to straighten out his mind. After years of drug use hi addled brain needs cleansing
Fluke is a grown woman, not a child. She let herself be used by Democrats.
No, like an idiot.Fluke is a grown woman, not a child. She let herself be used by Democrats.that is debatable. are Sarah Palin's children public figures because they went on stage and camera?
Stop being an ass. Rush is a grown man who needs to straighten out his mind. After years of drug use hi addled brain needs cleansing
used ... like a slut, right?
No, like an idiot.Fluke is a grown woman, not a child. She let herself be used by Democrats.
used ... like a slut, right?
She'll be discarded once her utility is over, and her best current Dem buds won't return her calls.
My issue is with liberals trying to criminalize speech. So-called hate speech is ludicrous.
Hate crimes are a bigger travesty than is hate speech. A crime is a crime. Codifying Hate crimes is discriminatory in that it makes one victim more important than another in the eyes of the law. If ever the slippery slope argument was applicable it is in convicting an accused defendant based on their motive.
Sandra Fluke made herself a public figure as is Rush Limbaugh. So what happened to Rushs free speech?
...
If you'd like to carry on both sides of this, be my guest. You can feel like you "won" easier.No, like an idiot.used ... like a slut, right?
Sure.
She'll be discarded once her utility is over, and her best current Dem buds won't return her calls.
Discarded .... like a slut?
Does the name "Cindy Sheehan" ring any bells?I have to say, its amusing you think you can actually divine the future cell phone record of someone you don't really even know. Who are her "Dem buds" and how often do they speak now? When will the call frequency decline, at what rate, and how long before it goes to zero? Please, tell us all the details!
If you'd like to carry on both sides of this, be my guest. You can feel like you "won" easier.
Does the name "Cindy Sheehan" ring any bells?I have to say, its amusing you think you can actually divine the future cell phone record of someone you don't really even know. Who are her "Dem buds" and how often do they speak now? When will the call frequency decline, at what rate, and how long before it goes to zero? Please, tell us all the details!
Predictably, you will fail to grasp the question.
Yeah. She's been ignored since The One was elected.
