Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
It's at least a measure. "Being a liberal" isn't something you should put on your resume.Limbaugh's net worth is $23 million
What's yours OP?
-$311.80?
That's way off. I think he earned like 70 million in 2012 alone. I've read his networth is close to a billion dollars.
Interesting use of the word "earned".
More interesting, the same poster above, a few hours prior, said he was worth 29 million. What can you spend 6 million on in three hours? Viagra and Dominican hookers cost that much?
Most interesting is the value system: that "how much one is worth", i.e. how many millions beyond what you can ever spend, is some kind of measure of accomplishment.
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever.
Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever.
https://www.google.com/search?q=editec&oq=editec&aqs=chrome.0.69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
editec
About 242,000 results (0.29 seconds)
https://www.google.com/search?q=edi...53,d.eWU&fp=aabfeb84bfcc56d1&biw=1920&bih=947
rush limbaugh
About 94,400,000 results (0.37 seconds)
Yes, you have a point.
my ISP sucks so that can't be it....
The left.
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Limbaugh's is a threat, he does not think the same as us Liberals
Whew...
Interesting surrealism. Where do you get your inspiration?
Who's talking about liberalism? I'm talking about progressives, who loath individual liberty and individual rights. Individualism, too, for that matter. All must be surrendered to the kollektive.Just FYI, there's no such thing as "thoughtcrime" under Liberalism. But I guess you know that, hence the irony.
Yeah, your e-peen is HUGE.Gatsby tried to fly this canard a few pages back. I challenged him to back it up and he ran away whimpering (posts 54-58).
I gotta get off this low-hanging fruit diet...
I think it's safe to say that Limbaugh isn't obscure, no matter how hard some progs want him to be.Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever.
https://www.google.com/search?q=editec&oq=editec&aqs=chrome.0.69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
editec
About 242,000 results (0.29 seconds)
https://www.google.com/search?q=edi...53,d.eWU&fp=aabfeb84bfcc56d1&biw=1920&bih=947
rush limbaugh
About 94,400,000 results (0.37 seconds)
Yes, you have a point.
Google search: "Hitler":
About 70,700,000 results (0.17 seconds)
What shall we conclude? That Hitler is more like Limblob than Editech?
Or that my internet service is faster than yours?
Hmm...
The left.
Who's talking about liberalism?Just FYI, there's no such thing as "thoughtcrime" under Liberalism. But I guess you know that, hence the irony.
I'm talking about progressives, who loath individual liberty and individual rights. Individualism, too, for that matter. All must be surrendered to the kollektive.
Anyone who supports bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wants to use government force to punish certain ways of thinking.
Anyone who supports Hate Crime laws wants to use government force to punish certain ways of thinking.
Anyone who defends the IRS slow-rolling tax-exempt applications wants to use government force to punish certain ways of thinking.
How many of those three issues do you support?
Gatsby tried to fly this canard a few pages back. I challenged him to back it up and he ran away whimpering (posts 54-58).
I gotta get off this low-hanging fruit diet...
Yeah, your e-peen is HUGE.
Limbaugh's net worth is $23 million
What's yours OP?
-$311.80?
You try reading it. That was CrusaderFrank's post, not mine. I riffed on his Borg reference with an apropos image of the progressive attitude towards Limbaugh.The left.Whew...
Interesting surrealism. Where do you get your inspiration?
Who's talking about liberalism?
Uummmmmm..... read your own post? The one with "us Liberals" in it? Ring a bell? Hello?
Nor do I. But I do pay attention to progressives.
Can't comment. I don't watch The Glenn Beck Fantasmagoria.
Of course it follows. Your inability to understand is not my problem.That doesn't follow. But again, I don't read the comic books featuring whatever double-dem-demon Hannity's featuring this week, so...
I know.That does.
Your inability to understand is not my problem.
Ummmm...really?What issues?
Of course they do. Your inability to understand is not my problem.I know about the first one; the next two have nothing to do with the topic.
I. Just. Told. You.Gatsby tried to fly this canard a few pages back. I challenged him to back it up and he ran away whimpering (posts 54-58).
I gotta get off this low-hanging fruit diet...Yeah, your e-peen is HUGE.
Dunno wtf that means, I'm just saying, Gats made the same point; I challenged him to back it up and he had nothing.
What you got?
You try reading it. That was CrusaderFrank's post, not mine. I riffed on his Borg reference with an apropos image of the progressive attitude towards Limbaugh.The left.
Who's talking about liberalism?
Uummmmmm..... read your own post? The one with "us Liberals" in it? Ring a bell? Hello?
Get it now?
Nor do I. But I do pay attention to progressives.
Of course it follows. Your inability to understand is not my problem.
I know.
Your inability to understand is not my problem.
Ummmm...really?
The three issues I just mentioned, genius.
Of course they do. Your inability to understand is not my problem.
I. Just. Told. You.Yeah, your e-peen is HUGE.
Dunno wtf that means, I'm just saying, Gats made the same point; I challenged him to back it up and he had nothing.
What you got?
I gave three examples of progressives using government force to silence ideas with which they disagree.
Look, you may believe "I dunno what you're talking about, so I win, durrr hurrr!" is a valid response, but it's not.
Wrong. I haven't mentioned liberals. CrusaderFrank did; I did not......aaaaand blammo, you committed the same fallacy Gatsby did; moving the goalposts.
In his case he went from Liberals to O'bama; you went from Liberals to "progressives". Whatever the fuck that means.
You're wrong on two counts.Since this flew over your head, "bringing back the Fairness Doctrine" is not an issue because it's not happening. But if it did happen it would have nothing to do with "using government force to punish certain ways of thinking". Because the FD didn't do that and couldn't do that. If anything it did the opposite.
Never mind indeed. You're not interested in discussion. You just want to be told you're right.The other two, we already did hate crimes and the IRS is just not something I deal with, so I can't comment because I don't know wtf you're talking about. But if you want the question addressed, explaining it IS your problem. If not, then never mind.
Wrong. I haven't mentioned liberals. CrusaderFrank did; I did not......aaaaand blammo, you committed the same fallacy Gatsby did; moving the goalposts.
In his case he went from Liberals to O'bama; you went from Liberals to "progressives". Whatever the fuck that means.
You're wrong on two counts.Since this flew over your head, "bringing back the Fairness Doctrine" is not an issue because it's not happening. But if it did happen it would have nothing to do with "using government force to punish certain ways of thinking". Because the FD didn't do that and couldn't do that. If anything it did the opposite.
1. Nothing you're capable of saying can go over my head.
2. The FD would silence voices because not all venues could profitably provide time for other views and would therefore have to shut down.
Never mind indeed. You're not interested in discussion. You just want to be told you're right.The other two, we already did hate crimes and the IRS is just not something I deal with, so I can't comment because I don't know wtf you're talking about. But if you want the question addressed, explaining it IS your problem. If not, then never mind.
How's that working out for you?
Tissue?Wrong. I haven't mentioned liberals. CrusaderFrank did; I did not......aaaaand blammo, you committed the same fallacy Gatsby did; moving the goalposts.
In his case he went from Liberals to O'bama; you went from Liberals to "progressives". Whatever the fuck that means.
You're wrong on two counts.
1. Nothing you're capable of saying can go over my head.
2. The FD would silence voices because not all venues could profitably provide time for other views and would therefore have to shut down.
Never mind indeed. You're not interested in discussion. You just want to be told you're right.The other two, we already did hate crimes and the IRS is just not something I deal with, so I can't comment because I don't know wtf you're talking about. But if you want the question addressed, explaining it IS your problem. If not, then never mind.
How's that working out for you?
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
It would be, if that's what I'd claimed.On to the meat:
It is not the role of the government to provide "profits" for businesses. That's the business owner's concern. There's your fallacy right there.
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
You have to be right before you can be told you're right. And I've always regarded you fairly direct. The instance you refer to was after a somewhat lengthy exchange and afterwards, I had finally left to perform work. But, I guess it's easier for you to create your own version of reality. That's no secret.
Tissue?Wrong. I haven't mentioned liberals. CrusaderFrank did; I did not.
You're wrong on two counts.
1. Nothing you're capable of saying can go over my head.
2. The FD would silence voices because not all venues could profitably provide time for other views and would therefore have to shut down.
Never mind indeed. You're not interested in discussion. You just want to be told you're right.
How's that working out for you?
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
It would be, if that's what I'd claimed.On to the meat:
It is not the role of the government to provide "profits" for businesses. That's the business owner's concern. There's your fallacy right there.
You're reading things that simply aren't there.
Wrong. I haven't mentioned liberals. CrusaderFrank did; I did not......aaaaand blammo, you committed the same fallacy Gatsby did; moving the goalposts.
In his case he went from Liberals to O'bama; you went from Liberals to "progressives". Whatever the fuck that means.
You're wrong on two counts.
1. Nothing you're capable of saying can go over my head.
2. The FD would silence voices because not all venues could profitably provide time for other views and would therefore have to shut down.
Never mind indeed. You're not interested in discussion. You just want to be told you're right.The other two, we already did hate crimes and the IRS is just not something I deal with, so I can't comment because I don't know wtf you're talking about. But if you want the question addressed, explaining it IS your problem. If not, then never mind.
How's that working out for you?
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
On to the meat:
It is not the role of the government to provide "profits" for businesses. That's the business owner's concern. There's your fallacy right there.
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
You have to be right before you can be told you're right. And I've always regarded you fairly direct. The instance you refer to was after a somewhat lengthy exchange and afterwards, I had finally left to perform work. But, I guess it's easier for you to create your own version of reality. That's no secret.
I invited you to post any evidence; you made several more posts over several hours, and had nothing. Now you've made another one, and you still have nothing.
How much makes zero?
Nobody ever tells me I'm right. What you guys usually give me is crickets. Like Gatsby did.
You have to be right before you can be told you're right. And I've always regarded you fairly direct. The instance you refer to was after a somewhat lengthy exchange and afterwards, I had finally left to perform work. But, I guess it's easier for you to create your own version of reality. That's no secret.
I invited you to post any evidence; you made several more posts over several hours, and had nothing. Now you've made another one, and you still have nothing.
How much makes zero?
