How about someone who wants to renounce homosexuality, shouldn't they be allowed to pull out of this fake contract?
How stupid. They can get a divorce.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How about someone who wants to renounce homosexuality, shouldn't they be allowed to pull out of this fake contract?
Correct.Thomas showed their hand today. Oberkfell is up next.
Your closet is calling.There was a reason gays were in the closet once. It's time to put them back in them and nail the door shut. They are a serious danger to children. They must be outlawed from same-sex marriage and adoptions due to their pedophilia nature of grooming them for their sexual pleasures.
You know sexual abuse of girls......Define "abused," nut job
Yes a fundamental part of a contract: consent.Animals and children can't consent, stupid.
No doubt the hateful, bigoted, authoritarian neo-fascist right will seek to allow the states to discriminate against gay and transgender Americans and criminalize homosexuality.And Justice Clarence Thomas concurs. This degeneracy must end. It should be outlawed. God forbids it!
Same-Sex Marriage and Contraception Should Be Next on Chopping Block: Clarence Thomas
Clarence Thomas wrote that the Supreme Court should reconsidering same-sex marriage and contraception after striking down Roe v. Wade.www.rollingstone.com
Correct.
Along with Lawrence v. Texas and Romer v. Evans – hateful, bigoted Republican-controlled states will again be at liberty to discriminate against gay and transgender Americans and criminalize homosexuality.
Where did this gays= child abusers come from? Most pedophiles go after underage girls.You know sexual abuse of girls......
Enlightened self interest.Notice how Thomas is not targeting Loving vs Virginia?
It’s time for the people to confront the tyranny of Republican minority rule.With the credibility of the court in ruins it's time to confront a future where states will have to ignore their decisions.
Conservatives should always resist pedophiles who want to have sex with childrenIt's not the gays kids should worry about. It's pedophiles. News flash,they are different.
Pedophiles are heterosexuals.Where did this gays= child abusers come from? Most pedophiles go after underage girls.
Conservatives should always resist pedophiles who want to have sex with children
but perverts who seek to promote homosexuality among children are no better than men who collect child pornography even if they dont personally engage in sex with children themselves
Wrong.Roe v. Wade is very different from Same Sex marriage. Overturning Roe v. Wade saved lives of unwanted children.
They really are showing us who they are and what they want.What a stupid post
They really are showing us who they are and what they want.
Handmaid's Tale redux. Incredible. Burqas on the way, gays being thrown off roofs.
View attachment 661904
Exactly.You still don't understand that this just a start. It indicates a legal philosophy that's leads nowhere good. Before this the court was loath to ever take back a right after it has been granted. We can no longer assume anything is settled law or that any right, other than guns, is safe.
And they're empowered by this.Correct.
Along with Lawrence v. Texas and Romer v. Evans – hateful, bigoted Republican-controlled states will again be at liberty to discriminate against gay and transgender Americans and criminalize homosexuality.
You posted proof that you have an serious emotional and intelectual disabilityI only posted the truth.
The Court isn’t evolving – it’s regressing; you may not be reactionary, but the Court certainly is.I've never been much of a reactionary or prone to panic and will not be this time either. This ruling was coming, and we knew it was coming, and that includes you. No. You cannot assume settled law will always be settled law when depending on the continually evolving Supreme Court and in practice, never could on rulings that were activist ruling, enacted because lazy legislators seeking to remain popular refused to act and do their jobs. I suspect if there are more radical moves made, legislative and executive action will be forced, that has been resisted in the past, up to and including expanding the court to get temporary balance and restraint. I will exercise my personal restraint from panicking prematurely.