martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 85,115
- 35,651
- 2,300
I don't give a shit about your argument. Nobody does.
What makes something constitutional is when the SCOTUS rules that it is.
So you can hide behind this nonsense of "its MY opinion!", if you want.
But in what the rest of us call "reality", interracial marriage was not a constitutionally protected right until the SCOTUS ruled that it is.
What makes something Constitutional is it being in the Constitution.
What makes it enforceable is the SC, but they can be wrong, Plessey and Roe show that.
Was separate but equal ever really Constitutional? Or was it unconstitutional and wrongly called that by the SC at the time?