Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What are they then?Fetuses aren't babies Dipshit. Did you fail anatomy?
Fetuses aren't babies Dipshit. Did you fail anatomy?
My plan for what?You say fetus I say baby, dipshit.... now what is your plan? It's not like you're some sort of influencer
My plan for what?
I don't care if you do or not.Making me believe your leftist crap.
I don't care if you do or not.
1. I love my mommy.So shut up. You won't because you're an attention seeking mommy boy
4. We dragged Republicans kicking and screaming into supporting free birth control you dumb Simp. I remember the absolute failure of the abstinence campaigns.Every leftist policy ends up in the gutter... every single one and you dumbasss haven't caught on
1. I love my mommy.
2. I love attention. Who doesn't?
3. This is a debate board so I'll think I'll just go ahead and keep running my mouth.
4. We dragged Republicans kicking and screaming into supporting free birth control you dumb Simp. I remember the absolute failure of the abstinence campaigns.
Why? You cankles need a break?Whatever...go ankle snap someone else
Why? You cankles need a break?
What about swipe predictive text guessing you instead your is indicative of being black?You cankles?
LoL you black? Lazy Try youz...
I bet that racist coward bitch SassyIrishLass doesn't come back to explain why she thought that mistype was indicative of being black.
What's does talking black mean Sassy?I'm here... you're just talking.... well black.
What's black about it?How's that? You should have said Are your....
That's not a typo. Lol , it's well....black
Boebert on birth control: ‘It’s cheaper to have a kid’
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said during a hearing on drug pricing that she once declined to pay for birth control medicine when she saw how high the price was at the pharmacy. Boebert recalled th…thehill.com
"Colorado representative Lauren Boebert claimed she had her third son because birth control was too expensive. The Democratic congresswoman took issue with the story, noting how Ms Boebert had voted against legislation that would help ensure wider access to contraception. Last year, Ms Boebert, alongside most of the House GOP, voted against the Right to Contraception Act, which would’ve enshrined the right to contraception in federal law. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a majority of women between ages 18 to 64 have used contraception at some point during their reproductive years, with more than three-quarters using multiple methods.
Under the Affordable Care Act, contraceptive coverage is required, though KFF found in 2022 that four in 10 women weren’t aware most insurance plans pay the full cost of birth control. Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a concurring opinion to the decision overturning Roe v Wade that the high court should revisit 1965’s Griswold v Connecticut, which forbids states from banning contraception."
So, this is an honest question....Is buying birth control more expensive than having a child? Especially if there are policies in place that helps to make access to birth control more affordable; especially in comparison to having a child. By most estimates, it costs on average 300,000 dollars to raise a child to the age of 18; and last I checked, there is no birth control medication that costs 300k...so why even make the argument that birth control is more expensive? Even if you are claiming birth control to be more expensive for hyperbolic effect, it's still a stupid argument to make...so why make it?
As George Carlin once said, the whole anti-abortion thing isn't about protecting children as much as it is about having control over a woman's pussy....but if as a right-winger, this "joke" by Carlin offends you and you disagree with that premise; do you think trying to ban women from having contraception makes his point any less true?? It all but proves his point if you ask me....
Many clinics in Texas were shut down, which is against the constitution, in the past 20 years, only to be re opened.They aren't working to shut down planned parenthoods because they are passing out birth control. They are doing so because they are performing abortions. And not giving federal funding to planned parenthood isn't shutting them down it's just not giving them federal taxpayer dollars. The federal government doesn't fund my business are they shutting me down? If planned parenthood stopped providing abortions, they would keep their federal funding.
Many clinics in Texas were shut down, which is against the constitution, in the past 20 years, only to be re opened.
Doctors and nurses are threatened, constantly.
2 Doctors, I know of, have been killed by extremist anti abortionists.
It affects giving help, like free cancer screening to poor people, and many other things.
Anti abortionists do not care about the effects of their actions and the closing of clinics. They have where to go for health care, unlike poor people who cannot afford it.
Pay attention. Texas passed laws for the past 2 years which forced many clinics in Texas to close, leaving poor people without a place to go. Judges declared those laws, which affected the clinics, unconstitutional. Look it up onlineThe federal government came in and said you can’t be open anymore?
I'm all for providing free birth control, even to minors, as long as it isn't abortion.Boebert on birth control: ‘It’s cheaper to have a kid’
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said during a hearing on drug pricing that she once declined to pay for birth control medicine when she saw how high the price was at the pharmacy. Boebert recalled th…
"Colorado representative Lauren Boebert claimed she had her third son because birth control was too expensive. The Democratic congresswoman took issue with the story, noting how Ms Boebert had voted against legislation that would help ensure wider access to contraception. Last year, Ms Boebert, alongside most of the House GOP, voted against the Right to Contraception Act, which would’ve enshrined the right to contraception in federal law. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a majority of women between ages 18 to 64 have used contraception at some point during their reproductive years, with more than three-quarters using multiple methods.
Under the Affordable Care Act, contraceptive coverage is required, though KFF found in 2022 that four in 10 women weren’t aware most insurance plans pay the full cost of birth control. Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a concurring opinion to the decision overturning Roe v Wade that the high court should revisit 1965’s Griswold v Connecticut, which forbids states from banning contraception."
So, this is an honest question....Is buying birth control more expensive than having a child? Especially if there are policies in place that helps to make access to birth control more affordable; especially in comparison to having a child. By most estimates, it costs on average 300,000 dollars to raise a child to the age of 18; and last I checked, there is no birth control medication that costs 300k...so why even make the argument that birth control is more expensive? Even if you are claiming birth control to be more expensive for hyperbolic effect, it's still a stupid argument to make...so why make it?
As George Carlin once said, the whole anti-abortion thing isn't about protecting children as much as it is about having control over a woman's pussy....but if as a right-winger, this "joke" by Carlin offends you and you disagree with that premise; do you think trying to ban women from having contraception makes his point any less true?? It all but proves his point if you ask me....
