- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,673
- 51,198
- 3,605
The Rise of Scientism and Intolerance: Beware the Con Man's Game
Post-Good Food UnEarthed
“So, in genuine Science, there are no authorities because it is recognized that Life is dynamic, and that there is always so much more to discover; and every new discovery will change the overall picture, add more depth. New discoveries can come from anyone. No one single person or living being will
goodfoodunearthed.com
". . . Back to Scientism.
Scientism is greatly focused on an objective reality. It prevents different sciences and other life studies from collaborating. The focus is primarily reductionist, with many narrow viewpoints. This prevents Big Picture viewing that can further everyone’s growth and expansion of knowledge.
Anything outside of the accepted narrative is ignored or destroyed. Any scientist or other expert who challenges the paradigms the priest class wishes to impose on the general public is shunned, defamed, or gotten rid of altogether. David Bohm, a physicist, once wrote a paper that challenged the current Quantum Physics paradigm. The heads of the field got a hold of this paper, and decided that since they could not prove any fault in it, they would collectively ignore it. This is much like Google deciding what search results should be made available, and social media platforms currently censoring, disabling accounts, removing videos and other content that goes against the acceptable narrative.
Let me ask you something:
When you were born, do you think you thought: “Well, I am alive now – but I am only as alive as the experts say I can be, and the world is exactly as they say it is, therefore there is no point in asking questions or exploring or listening to my own inner guidance because it’s already taken care of by those experts who obviously are doing this for my own good.”
Do you think this way now?
If you do not think this way, do you subconsciously see Life this way?
Look at your reactions and responses to your daily life. What is guiding that? Whose thoughts make up your world? Where did those thoughts originate? Did you examine and investigate your thoughts?
The other issue I want to address here ties in with Scientism, and this is Intolerance.
I bring this in because Scientism is a key instigator of Intolerance.
Intolerance is based on believing that certain people, words, actions, or ideas have fixed, immutable existence. This is based on the illusion of a totally objective reality. Look more closely.
None of those things are immutable or fixed. They are all Dynamic and subjective.
Yet, many people are being guided to believe otherwise, and this is creating intense polarization. This polarization leaves absolutely no space for receptivity, for open listening, for being present fully in the moment and capable of truly seeing reality. It puts a blindfold over every interaction, preventing true perception. This is the trick of Scientism. This is the con man’s game.
The con man will make you believe that you are lacking, that there is a problem. He alone has the answer to this problem, and of course, he will use truths and persuasive, charismatic language to get you believing in his version of reality. He will convince you that what he offers is for the benefit of everyone, and that anyone who disagrees is ill-informed, biased, or just a bad person – because, let’s face it, if we don’t address these problems, we’re all doomed to hell. How could anyone want that kind of result? Don’t you love your fellow human? Don’t you love the planet? Well, then we MUST do as the con man says. His solution sounds so GOOD.
There is inherent polarization in the con man’s game.
And the key is to begin by disempowering the individual.
Disempowerment is a crafty game, but it has proven time and again to be an effective one.
Why would I disempower you?
To create a desire that predictably wants what I will offer.
I already have the story and the solution lined up.
You will without doubt adopt the language I have set up, the new buzz words that will spread far and wide and be adopted massively on a global scale. I don’t need to convince everyone. I only need to convince persons who are reputable, trusted individuals who already influence many individuals. And for anyone who finds fault in my game, let us publicly shame them and make them outcasts; if we have to revert to violence, then it is acceptable, because we are on the side of RIGHT.
What we are facing today is the final push in a long-term chess game to put Scientism at the top as the One Global Religion, ruled by a One World Government run by unelected Experts, and personal freedoms limited to what the Experts deem is acceptable. Yes, you have freedom of speech, but only the speech we deem is acceptable. And, of course, we can override any individual freedoms when we deem it necessary, and we do not need to provide proof behind our reasoning. Trust the Science!
Is this the kind of world you want to live in?
How are you liking it so far?
Because I can tell you now: the rise of Scientism will destroy Science.. . . "
