basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,121
- 2,220
- Banned
- #301
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your analysis is noted.
It may be largely influenced by ideological dogma, but thorough analysis of pertinent data by those who are qualified to accrue and study it will ascertain the accuracy of your opinion.
How do you honestly confront a con? For one thing, you unmask the scum perpetrating the con. These are the same people who just got done swindling us out of an honest election.Your pretense is deranged, of course. Why do you make such foolish claims?... Of course, there were no floods, fires or hurricanes before we started burning fossil fuels.
In addition to abandoning the pariah nations who do not join in the global quest to honestly confront anthropogenic climate change, the enlightened perspective the U.S. will again share with the international community recovers some of its previously high esteem that had been so seriously damaged.
An ideological cult is hysterical because its object of devotion has been toppled by the American People, and progress is in the offing!
The U.S. voted out a climate denier, and world leaders jumped for joy
Outside U.S. borders, world leaders were celebrating for a different reason — they were welcoming the election of a president who actually believes in climate change.
On Twitter, presidents and prime ministers from across the globe welcomed Biden with pointed mentions of climate change. "Congratulations to Joe Biden on his election as President of the United States," wrote Boris Johnson, prime minister of the United Kingdom. "I look forward to working together on our shared priorities, from climate change to trade and security." Frank Bainimarama, the prime minister of Fiji — a South Pacific nation facing rising sea levels and dying coral reefs — chimed in: "Now, more than ever, we need the USA at the helm of these multilateral efforts (and back in the #ParisAgreement — ASAP!)."
Part of the international reaction is a result of Biden's promise that he will rejoin the Paris Agreement on his first day in the White House, putting the U.S. back in the landmark accords that encourage all member countries to cut their carbon dioxide emissions to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. President Trump began the process of pulling the U.S. out of the agreement back in 2017, but thanks to bureaucratic red tape, the move wasn't finalized until last Wednesday, the day after the presidential election.
It's also a reflection of how world governments have begun to take the threat of global warming more seriously. "Over the last four years, climate change has just rocketed to the top of foreign policy agendas for many of our allies around the world," said Nat Keohane, senior vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund. That's because, he said, "the impacts of climate change on everyday life are becoming impossible to ignore."
![]()
The U.S. voted out a climate denier, and world leaders jumped for joy
World leaders celebrated the election of a politician who actually believes in climate changewww.salon.com
Such a fake notion is a symptom of that paralyzing ideological dogma of which we spoke, of course.You mean the same qualified people that were wrong on everything the last several decades?
Such a fake notion is a symptom of that paralyzing ideological dogma of which we spoke, of course.
Another such tenacious article of faith has the true believers still anxiously awaiting the return of their demigod's investigators from Hawaii.
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
There is only science. It is non-partisan and non-political..at least..until the politicians and partisans get a-hold of it.There is real science and there is democrat science. Only a fool would take democrat science seriously.
Republican 'science' is not a good look either...climate change deniers are among some of the stupidest people I've ever met.
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
I only know what is. And we are not Water World like Prog Globalists have spewed to us in their "The architects of fear" agendas. And this is an agenda based on Progressive Socialist Political doctrine. Politicians have killed people the last several months with their attacks on Trump and their squashing of human rights to the citizens.![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
Al made a lot of phony claims, I don't remember any specifics.
If they meant monetarily, they were correct.![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
If they meant monetarily, they were correct.![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
I have also been alive long enough to know that everything the Liberal scientists say is 100+% bullshit.If they meant monetarily, they were correct.![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
Nah, they meant literally, under water.
.
Crap is crap, and the package your present it in is beside the point. It's just that some packages are clearly labeled as to their invariable content.When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
I have also been alive long enough to know that everything the Liberal scientists say is 100+% bullshit.If they meant monetarily, they were correct.![]()
Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong.dailycaller.com
Daily Caller? That clinches it for sentient entities!
When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
.
If it's not from the New York Times or CNN, it doesn't count.
Yeah, I'm thinking Dr. Spencer doesn't work for either of them. Didn't Al the whore predict all the coastal cities would be under water by now?
.
Nah, they meant literally, under water.
.
Anything to sell a book.
Crap is crap, and the package your present it in is beside the point. It's just that some packages are clearly labeled as to their invariable content.When you can't address the content, you attack the source. What a fucking loser you are.
I guess your blind faith won't allow to to accept the obvious explanation for 7 million more Americans voting for the Loser's opponent.
Most Americans who had disapproved of him for four years in poll after poll expressed their wish that he go away when they were finally given the opportunity to officially register their enduring sentiment.
Makes eminent sense without the need to contrive crackpot, paranoid fantasies.
As a hyper-partisan, prejudiced far beyond reason, please do not lace your orange Kool-Aid with disinfectants.I have also been alive long enough to know that everything the Liberal scientists say is 100+% bullshit.
Anything to sell a book.