Because Clinton has the Clinton machine protecting her. The bias is ungodly.
We KNOW she committed crimes. We KNOW she wiped her server of 30,000 subpoenaed emails. If she was innocent, why do that?
We KNOW she mishandled classified information on a private server. But we also found out that the man investigating her, James Comey, also had an illegal private server.
We KNOW she lied under oath to congress saying that she turned over all of her work related emails. Because we KNOW she shredded 30,000 of them.
The FBI thought Hillary would be president and didn't want to piss her off. We KNOW this. There is proof that they said "Don't go after "for bear" because she might be president, ya know?"
The corruption goes so deep it's unmatched in modern history.
Now We Know: FBI Ignored Lawbreaking To Exonerate Hillary Clinton | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD
Why change "gross negligence" to "extremely careless"? To protect the Clinton machine of course.
When law enforcement becomes an arm of a political party, it's called a police state. Democrats should be just as eager as Republicans to make sure the FBI comes clean about any political corruption, and that it cleans house. But they don't. The liberals are completely fine with FBI corruption as long as it helps Clinton.