Let me address that.
The difference is simple: those things can be tested, and have been. I don’t personally test every pill or chair, but I rely on systems built on verifiable standards: pharmacology, engineering, regulation, peer review. My trust is conditional, grounded in reproducible results and accountability.
Mine is also based on results and what has been seen throughout history.
Faith, the way you’re using it, isn’t testable. It doesn’t rest on evidence, it replaces it. Religion asks for belief without verification. Science builds trust through verification.
God is not science, as I lay out below (in fact, He created science). Let's put it this way. Let's take God out of it for a moment and replace Him with an alien being that exists in higher dimensions that our brains are incapable of discerning (you can draw a 5-dimensional being, right?). That alien decides when, where, and how to insert himself into our dimensions, and what parts of him we will see. In that scenario, can man's science prove that the alien exists, or can it prove that he does not?
So no, I don’t live on faith. I live on justified conditional confidence. And that’s a very different thing.
I actually like that phrase, justified conditional confidence, so I'll probably use it.
I too rely on tested facts as well. Had there not been millions upon millions of miraculous events throughout history and including today, I would be skeptical. There have, however, been those events, so I believe. I have also seen things in my own life that convince me, and they're not always miraculous. I see you demanding proof before you believe, but when you are convinced and believe, more proof is forthcoming, and again, not always miraculous.
What I find interesting, however, is that the standard of proof keeps shifting. I literally had a self-proclaimed atheist (there's really no true atheists because they can't disprove God's existence, they can only really be agnostic) admit to me that God appearing in front of him and doing whatever should be sufficient proof of His existence wouldn't be enough, because he doesn't even trust his own experience. He would have to have other people tell him they experienced something. I asked how that was different from groups of people all experiencing God's presence the same way telling others what happened and he had no answer. Sometimes the determination to disbelieve something is so strong that no amount of evidence is sufficient.
God is not a science experiment, His actions cannot be replicated in a lab, and He acts as HE chooses to act, not as we direct Him to act. His presence, therefore, cannot be proven or disproven by man's attempts to quantify Him and in essence, put Him in a box. It is folly, then, to demand He show up and do something miraculous to convince people of His existence. I call that, "Do a trick" theology, and here's what would happen:
1. Yeshua the Christ shows up and stops the awful half-time show at the Super Bowl. Millions immediately cheer. He announces Himself, proves He exists and makes clear His intentions for mankind. Surprisingly, everything He says lines up perfectly with His written Word. He leaves deep scorch marks in the ground to prove He was there. A small percentage of the crowd refuses to believe they saw and heard anything and castigate those who do believe. Does Islam disappear, or do millions cling to their beliefs anyway?
2. Most of the people attending the Super Bowl are convinced that it's no special effect because they went down on the field and saw the burn marks, but within hours, online keyboard jockeys start claiming it was nothing more than an effect and everyone was hoodwinked.
3. A museum is built over the scorch marks and exhibits made of the videos and firsthand testimonies of those who witnessed the event.
4. Within a generation, a movement of millions are spreading the word that it never happened. Those who witnessed it firsthand produce photos and videos showing not only Yeshua's appearance, but the marks He left in the ground. They say to visit the museum and see for yourself.
5. Within two generations, it starts to become folklore. Just like Woodstock, millions claim they were there who were not, and they spread wild stories about it that did not happen.
Eventually, God has to do it all over again just to convince people all over again. Does any of this sound familiar? Talk to a Holocaust denier and see the effects of those who are determined to not believe. There are people still alive who lived through it, but are they taken seriously? Within a hundred years, there will be a sizeable percentage of the population that will look at the Holocaust as something that might have happened, but maybe wasn't as bad as people said it was, their reaction to it will be muted, and they will allow doubt to creep in, totally losing the effect that we need to prevent it from ever happening again.
Now, the question becomes, what would it take for YOU to admit God exists, and would that proof make a difference in how you live your life? Be careful, God has been known to show people exactly what they demanded He show them.