Zone1 Why do you need gods?

[Synthaholic]

I check threads that I've posted in, whether I get an alert or not. I don't know what you're doing.

 

[ding]

Thus proving Synthaholic doesn't know what gravity is.

 

[Blues Man]

YOu certainly act like one, a lot.

You don't know how I act all you have are your ill informed 2 dimensional assumptions

 

[Blues Man]

Why do people have a need to believe in gravity?

We know that gravity exists and can actually measure the force.

You don't have to believe in gravity to be affected by it.

 

[Blues Man]

There is a God because leftist are to ignorant to survive without his divine help.

Hardly proof.

But that isn't the question.

 

[Correll]

You don't know how I act all you have are your ill informed 2 dimensional assumptions

No, I see you doing it here. You act like a lot like standard lefties.

 

[Blues Man]

No, I see you doing it here. You act like a lot like standard lefties.

Like I said the my dominant hand has nothing to do with my politics

If anything I am most closely aligned with libertarians than democrats or republicans and I have a lot of disagreement with libertarians on things but you are incapable of the thought processes that will allow you to see more than just 2 choices for anything

 

[Correll]

Like I said the my dominant hand has nothing to do with my politics

If anything I am most closely aligned with libertarians than democrats or republicans and I have a lot of disagreement with libertarians on things but you are incapable of the thought processes that will allow you to see more than just 2 choices for anything

Lefties, there is just something wrong with the way that they think. And you exhibit that behavior.

 

[Blues Man]

Lefties, there is just something wrong with the way that they think. And you exhibit that behavior.

No I don't but you don't have the intellectual capacity to understand that.

 

[Mashmont]

Because it's provable.

As is the existence of the God of Abraham

 

[Blues Man]

As is the existence of the God of Abraham

if it was actually proven no one could deny the existence of gods.

 

[Synthaholic]

if it was actually proven no one could deny the existence of gods.

When you ask for proof the lame answer is always "look around at beautiful nature" or some other crap.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

What part of "Existing. God is existence itself. Existence cannot come from non-existence." did you not understand?

The part where Aquinas is told that this is a case of "special pleading" by arbitrarily defining God as the only thing which can come from non-existence.

But that's a LOT of philosophy and Catholic theology you wouldn't understand anyway.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolution is "inconsistent" with the actual content of the Word of God

And there it is. Why the dog and pony show? Just say that and you're done.

 

[ding]

The part where Aquinas is told that this is a case of "special pleading" by arbitrarily defining God as the only thing which can come from non-existence.

Good thing I'm not making that argument. My argument is that nothing can come from non-existence.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

Good thing I'm not making that argument. My argument is that nothing can come from non-existence.

Including God, right?

So where did Good come from?

 

[ding]

Including God, right?

So where did Good come from?

Eternal and unchanging. Has to be. No other solution to the first cause conundrum.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

Eternal and unchanging. Has to be. No other solution to the first cause conundrum.

So I was right. But you are too fucking stupid to even recognize who Aquinas is.


What a laugh. You are the dumbestfuck

 

[ding]

So I was right. But you are too fucking stupid to even recognize who Aquinas is.


What a laugh. You are the dumbestfuck

You were wrong. But you are too fucking stupid to notice.

 

[ding]

So I was right. But you are too fucking stupid to even recognize who Aquinas is.


What a laugh. You are the dumbestfuck

What if I could prove to you that there is indeed something that is eternal and unchanging?