Baron Von Murderpaws
Diamond Member
If you're old enough to hold a weapon, and sentient enough to know how to use it...............then killing for the sake of killing, no matter WHAT AGE they are, is grounds for instant extermination.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And don't we execute a dog who kills someone? Doesn't a 12 year old know right from wrong better than a dog?
But honestly, a 13-year-old who kills may not understand how wrong that is. Should we then go to the extreme and just kill them back?
I say no. While rehab is often useless. it isn't always useless. And kids can mature and learn morals.
Tell Me. How many 13-year-olds have total impulse control? Hell, for that matter, tell Me how many 16 yo have total impulse control?
Today, our children are not taught much about right and wrong. <-- an opinon
so, I have a problem with killing minors for crimes committed unless you can show a history and a pattern of depraved behavior.
Only monsters murder an innocent human being, leftist scum.
So, I'm sure you can show where I said we should not hold minors accountable for their actions.
The Bible gives a near adult status to children who reach 12 years. First degree murderers at 12 years are EXTREMELY RARE. This is because THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING, and need to be held accountable for their behavior.
Jesus was 12 when he was in the temple, holding his own, with the rabbis of his day. He was among his intellectual "equals" as a kidIt's notable that the Jewish tradition of Bar Mitzvah, is based on recognizing a young man as having reached adulthood, ready for all the responsibilities of such, at the age of thirteen.
For the same reason that they can't do a lot of things, like enter into contracts legally, or give consent, because they are considered not mature enough to make good decisions.If anybody commits murder (not including self-defense as that's not murder in my mind) why should a juvenile be any different from an adult if they are fully aware what they did was horribly wrong?
Tell Me. How many 13-year-olds have total impulse control? Hell, for that matter, tell Me how many 16 yo have total impulse control?
Today, our children are not taught much about right and wrong. <-- an opinon
so, I have a problem with killing minors for crimes committed unless you can show a history and a pattern of depraved behavior.
Well, the line has to be drawn somewhere. You could argue that the line could be lowered, but there still has to be a line. Where do you think it should be?If anybody commits murder (not including self-defense as that's not murder in my mind) why should a juvenile be any different from an adult if they are fully aware what they did was horribly wrong?
a juvenile is anyone under the age of 18.If anybody commits murder (not including self-defense as that's not murder in my mind) why should a juvenile be any different from an adult if they are fully aware what they did was horribly wrong?
did you ask anyone in the middle east?You're Ok with a 6 ear old getting put to death?
Who in their right mind wants to live in the Middle East?
The male pre-frontal cortex plays a central role in cognitive control, thereby influencing impulse control and decision making and in males, it doesn't fully develop until between 23 and 25 years of age. Because of this factor, highly negative decisions and actions can be made without giving full thought on the outcome of such decisions and actions.If anybody commits murder (not including self-defense as that's not murder in my mind) why should a juvenile be any different from an adult if they are fully aware what they did was horribly wrong?
a juvenile is anyone under the age of 18.
You're Ok with a 6 ear old getting put to death?