Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 72,761
- 68,534
- 3,605
Ha ha ha...lolAgreed... hahaKNOWN CARRIERS?????.....View attachment 361371Jesus, what’s wrong with you people. Being cautious and treating everybody as POSSIBLE carriers is very different than the isolation/quarantine that KNOWN CARRIERS, would undertake. When somebody tests positive they can isolate to a higher degree as we have done during the shut down and contact tracing can be performed so people they were exposed to can be tested and isolate as well.You've got piss poor reading comprehension. Dude didn't say everybody is a carrier. He said everybody is CONSIDERED a carrier. That is absolutely true. The reason for universal lockdown policies is that even asymptomatic people can spread covid, which means that everybody has to be treated as a viral threat. Another way of saying that is that everybody has to be considered as someone who might right now be viral. And yet another way of saying that is that everybody has to be, and therefore is, considered a carrier of the virus, and therefore everybody has to lock down.Saying everybody is a carrier of the virus is something that you made up in your fantasyland. Not something that is real. Another supporting fact of your moronismMaybe you suck hyena taint when it comes to explaining things?Why are you a moron? Because you don’t understand basic things even after they are explained to you. That’s whyWhy?All who voted yes are morons
We already assume everyone has the virus (lockdown/muzzle mandates). No need to test for it unless you are sick, right?
If everyone is considered a carrier of the virus (like they are now) the only reason to test is to assess proper treatment protocols for people who are actually symptomatic.
So, why don't you explain to me why my position is wrong, and fuck off with your insults.
So the question is valid. If everybody has to be locked down anyway, why bother testing people who aren't symptomatic? So that you can proudly tell them that it's a good thing they stayed home, and that maybe they shouldn't have travelled out just to get tested for something that clearly isn't bothering them?
One is a safety precaution and the other is direct treatment/action
View attachment 361372
Now that is changing the subject moron....