50% of women 30 years or younger don’t have children and 50% of them will never have a child.

Just a shame they don't have the brains to make the choice before they open their legs.

Where do you think it's best for a woman to make the choice if they don't want a baby?

Inquisitive mind just asking.

Aren't you make a moralistic statement in actual support of women not having children? It appears they are agreeing with you.
 
When It comes to issues like this ie the depression of young people, the high drug usage by young people and the astronomical rate of single lonely people ….the left-wing will at times laugh about it, they will deny it, they will troll or joke about it…. I’ve seen them make fun of young lonely people who have drug problems. They celebrate it to. They say it’s “progress”
That is horrible. Got any examples to share?
 
If you want to eliminate poverty you create a big strong middle class that poor people can strive to enter. Your policies don't help poor people who want to get out of poverty. You want to pay them less not more. Not give them healthcare or better wages. Gimme a break.
How do you propose to create a 'big, strong' middle class? What opportunities don't poor people have now that a 'big, strong' middle class would support?

Why don't the poor people EARN a better wage instead of being over-dependent on government -- a clear-cut approach to not incentivize someone to better themselves? Notable individuals who were living in poverty and better themselves to either start businesses and/or become wealthy are: Opray Winfrey, Howard Schultz, Denzel Washington, etc .. etc.. etc.
 
Aren't you make a moralistic statement in actual support of women not having children? It appears they are agreeing with you.
I'm all for mature decisions. Have children when you both want children, don't have children when you both don't want children. Not rocket science, in fact, it's so simple yet many can't figure the basics out.

Do you struggle with the concept of conceiving like those seeking abortions?
 
Thank you. It irritates me when women are made to be the scapegoats.
When I was married, we both decided when to have children. Both have to take responsibility for that decision. We had our first in 1998. I wouldn't have another unless the baby only appeared in 2001 onwards. I didn't want a stigma 2000 born kid.

Most men think with their penis and when they've ejaculated, it means most have emptied their brains. It takes two and the women get the raw end of the deal. But they need to keep their legs shut too if they don't want kids. There are more orifices and positions up for grabs to have fun.
 
So you did not do you part. You should have had three. ;)

There won't be a shortage. We have nearly a million legal immigrants a year, and thats before technology wipes out all the jobs.
I had HW and failed. All I could afford was 2
 
Well, this isn’t a case of young people waiting to have children. It’s about them never having children and remaining lonely and in a lot of cases hooked on drugs.

And 90% of those women under 30 without kids who will never have kids…. will go on to regret that decision and be unhappy the rest of their life. According to psychologists (no not according to Jordan Peterson), there has been a study conducted on this issue.



The data is not from the right wing or Jordan Peterson…but from non-biased independent sources, free of left or right wing influence.

When It comes to issues like this ie the depression of young people, the high drug usage by young people and the astronomical rate of single lonely people ….the left-wing will at times laugh about it, they will deny it, they will troll or joke about it…. I’ve seen them make fun of young lonely people who have drug problems. They celebrate it to. They say it’s “progress”

Hopefully these trends are reversed.

My sister never had kids and was not a drug addict.
 

50% of women 30 years or younger don’t have children and 50% of them will never have a child.​


Doesn't surprise me. Progressivism has told them that a career is more important than a family, and that men are definitely not worth the bother. A young woman doesn't need either of those in today's world, they'd just get in the way of her career.

But do not worry! There are plenty of Hondurans, Jamaicans, Latinos, Chinese and Kenyans that will be more that happy to keep churning out those babies.
 
uh-huh ... that's rich, seeing that you are for forcing births to term.

control.

Actually I am for women to make up their fucking mind by week 10-12. Used to be week 10-15 but I figure 3 months is enough.
 
Just a shame they don't have the brains to make the choice before they open their legs.

Where do you think it's best for a woman to make the choice if they don't want a baby?

Inquisitive mind just asking.
You don't have the brains to make a choice for them.
 
How many kids did you have?

None. I however don't see advocating for a childless existence as a good thing.

I also will have around $2M in my 401k before I retire, and thus won't be a burden on society because of it.
 
That is horrible. Got any examples to share?
Tons of documents and sources have been posted showing a drug problem among the youth, record loneliness. I’m done with posting sources again and again only to have you guys trolled when I make a very long, detailed post no more need for that.

If you folks are not aware of these problems, you are living under a rock or if you do know about it and you’re trolling.
 
The best way to put people back to work is to pay wages and benefits that incentivize them. America's extreme income inequality won't allow that to happen because the profits in it's capitalist system are eaten up by the top 10% and no profit margin is left to pay the working class.

And now it's becoming obvious that countries that feel social responsibility toward the working class, are bowing down to the American way. Their corporations leave nothing for the working class after exorbitant profits at the top.

How can you pay people more than what they add to a given product or service?
 
Back
Top Bottom