"Law abiding". The above does not apply.So if I have a restraining order against you and you violate that restraining order....
You support red flag laws, and thus, you want to take guns from the law abiding.
Why won't you admit it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Law abiding". The above does not apply.So if I have a restraining order against you and you violate that restraining order....
Tell me, were the founders of this nation justified in taking up arms against the British Monarch?And...when do you think that is? And will you, like some here, blame you taking up arms on the Left?
Thus, the question:
At what point do we conclude the political and legal process has failed, and we take up arms?
It's a perfectly legitimate question.
Well?
It's possible he does not know. I suppose.Playing stupid....Or maybe not.
buying all the judges to shut down the steal was a good start for those at that discussion.And...when do you think that is? And will you, like some here, blame you taking up arms on the Left?
evidence was supplied to bought off judges, at least 60 of them threw every case out. remember that?Whining about a loss with nothing but allegations or innuendo and no real evidence
And so, you agree -- it is a legitimate question.When ever you are convinced I suppose.
Nope....the South walked away from United States political parties when they seceded. Stephen Douglas was the Democrat candidate for President in 1860....how many Southern states did he carry?that was your sorry party, nothing's changed.
Not bought up....The left is too cheap for that....Intimidated is more like it.buying all the judges to shut down the steal was a good start for those at that discussion.
"evidence was supplied to bought off judges"........................evidence was supplied to bought off judges, at least 60 of them threw every case out. remember that?
"intimidated"? You mean like threatening to shoot them?Not bought up....The left is too cheap for that....Intimidated is more like it.
but you don't care about the gangs in chicago killing young black kids. We do know that is legitimate for the demofks.If one is an obvious danger to themselves or others - They need a time out.
Are you saying the rightwing isn't smart enough to not fall for that? Ok, I can agree with you with the Right not being smart enough.The left is hoping to provoke rightwing violence
Which is the purpose of the daily Black Lies Matter and ANTIFA riots in blue cities across America for the past 18 months
sure, you missed that huh? Well to be fair, I believe they were threatened, but bought off could be it as well. Threatened is most likely what transpired. I bet you have no idea how that would work would you?"evidence was supplied to bought off judges"........................
Oh really? What war? The one in your minds?There is no murder in war.
Well sure - Black lives/deaths only matter when Democrats can benefit from them.but you don't care about the gangs in chicago killing young black kids. We do know that is legitimate for the demofks.
"Law abiding". The above does not apply.
You support red flag laws, and thus, you want to take guns from the law abiding.
Why won't you admit it?
Ayep.THe Left is "planning" for the Right to start shooting at them?
So...the NRA lied when they claimed that Former President Obama would take away all our guns (send money)?I didnt say anything about what they said,,
its what you said I have the issue with,,
why are you spinning from what you said??