What's wrong with Christianity

[kjw47]

When people act with their better natures , especially in dealing with others ; that is the best testament we could make towards the Creator Entity. That is the fulfillment needed here.

While on Earth Jesus showed Gods loving side, But few realize that in Noahs day and Sodom and Gommorah, Jesus was by Gods side giving 100% support to his Fathers will. And here at Rev 19:11 when Every kingdom( govts, armies, supporters)Rev 16) on earth is mislead to stand in opposition to Gods king at Armageddon( Gods day of anger) 99% will fall by Jesus Orders which is his Fathers will because they will not listen to truth. Jesus warned the earth that in these last days it will be like Noahs day( 99.9% died) by Gods will. He said the world took no note.(Luke 17:26) 99% minimum right now will not listen to Gods truth. 99% of all religion is false including 99% claiming to be Christian religions. The results of their darkness from Rev 19:11=Rev 19: 17:18) proving a kingdom= Govts, armies, supporters)

 

[Donald H]

One wrong that could be easily and quickly corrected is priests diddling little boys..

Simply declare all Catholic churches as unsafe for children unless the kids are kept within arms reach of their parents.

That will eliminate all the problems except child cruelty by indoctrination of them believing the lies of priests.

 

[kjw47]

One wrong that could be easily and quickly corrected is priests diddling little boys..

Simply declare all Catholic churches as unsafe for children unless the kids are kept within arms reach of their parents.

That will eliminate all the problems except child cruelty by indoctrination of them believing the lies of priests.

The priests and nuns do it as well. Its a religion of darkness. Peter was married, yet they claim he was (the first Pope=hogwash) No where does the bible say one taking the lead in a religion cannot be married.

 

[Donald H]

The priests and nuns do it as well. Its a religion of darkness. Peter was married, yet they claim he was (the first Pope=hogwash) No where does the bible say one taking the lead in a religion cannot be married.

The bigger problem is that the bibles say far too much that is not intended to be believed as literally true. Even this child abuse by the church might be interpreted as necessary for priests that are forbidden sexual gratification.

Are there any priests who are not guilty of diddling little boys?

All of the problems of this nature could be remedied by the church finally proclaiming that which is literally true in their bibles, and that which is not intended to be accepted as truth.

Even stories such as Jonah and the big fish, or Noah's ark, for two examples are still being questioned by the brighter members of the flock.

But instead, the brights among Catholics continue to not stir the pot with flock members who continue to claim that it's all quite true!

The Catholic church has taken the lead of allowing the flock to interpret the bibles as they choose, but the flock has ignored the message.

 

[Donald H]

Is this a literally true story? Christians just don't want to commit to saying one way or another?​

----------------------------------------------------------------------

​

Rape, Incest, and a Pillar of Salt​

• Source: Genesis 19

God's most cherished man in all of Sodom was called Lot. God liked him so much that he sent two angels to stay with him. However, during the night, a gang of rapists descended on Lot's house to defile the angels!

Lot, in all his holy righteousness, declared: "No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them."


And that, kids, is why God allows rape. It doesn't stop there though. After using their magical powers to blind the rapists, the angels called down air-support from God. Lot and his family were urged to flee the city while God rained burning sulfur on the inhabitants.

However, there was one small caveat: God didn't want them to look back at his shameful annihilation of the Sodomites. Of course, women are stupid in the Bible, so: "Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt." Why a pillar of salt? God knows, literally.


Lot and his two daughters retreated to a cave in the mountains without a thought for their dessicated mother. The daughters decided that their father was too old to find another wife, so they did what any loyal daughter would do (right?), they got Lot drunk and had sex with him. Both of the daughters got pregnant by their father and, presumably, they all lived happily ever after in a Mississippi trailer park.

 

[Yarddog]

If you have negative feelings about something in Christianity feel free to post it here. I created an alternate thread called what is right about Christianity, for those who want to post the like. I'm hoping to avoid the constant bickering that often occurs between posters which ends up distracting from the conversation. Enjoy !

1)The same thing thats wrong with Islam, Atheism, Hinduism and Bhuddism.

2)The partcipants in these are all humans.

3)Every one of those above mentioned groups also has something good about them but the negatives will never be resolved. (refer to line 2)

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When people act with their better natures , especially in dealing with others ; that is the best testament we could make towards the Creator Entity. That is the fulfillment needed here.

That necessary effort shows the flawed nature of any creator or design and casts justified, rational doubt in the existence of a creator at all.

 

[Donald H]

True story or just more bible hocus-pocus?​

---------------------------------------------------------------------

​

Nile turning to blood​

One of the Seven Plagues of Egypt. The water of the Nile turned blood red. An algal bloom? John Martin (1789-1854) British painter. Oil on canvas. (Image credit: Universal History Archive/Getty Images)

The longest river in the world could have been filled not with freshwater but with blood, at least according to one passage in the Bible.

After Egypt's pharaoh refuses to grant the Israelites freedom, God tells Moses and Aaron to use their staffs to turn the Nile river to blood. "Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded. In the sight of Pharaoh and in the sight of his servants he lifted up the staff and struck the water in the Nile, and all the water in the Nile turned into blood. And the fish in the Nile died, and the Nile stank, so that the Egyptians could not drink water from the Nile. There was blood throughout all the land of Egypt," Exodus 7:20-21.

The pharaoh simply shrugs off what happened. "Pharaoh turned and went into his house, and he did not take even this to heart. And all the Egyptians dug along the Nile for water to drink, for they could not drink the water of the Nile," Exodus 7:23-24.

There is one Egyptian record that refers to an event that sounds a bit like this. The Ipuwer papyrus, written in the name of a man named "Ipuwer," discusses Egypt suffering from chaos and warfare and says that "the river is blood." The text dates back more than 3,000 years although its precise date is a matter of debate among scholars. Another, more mundane, explanation for why the Nile may appear red is that red algae bloom can cause the water to appear red.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just one more bible story that needs to be proclaimed by the Catholic church to be literally true or not?
As our Ding would suggest, the laughing about these whoppers is done and it's time for believers to weep over being hoaxed for so long.

 

[Meriweather]

One wrong that could be easily and quickly corrected is priests diddling little boys..

Simply declare all Catholic churches as unsafe for children unless the kids are kept within arms reach of their parents.

That will eliminate all the problems except child cruelty by indoctrination of them believing the lies of priests.

Are you in favor of closing all schools for the same reason? A greater percentage of teachers are also guilty.

Are there any priests who are not guilty of diddling little boys?

Yes. Ninety-six percent of priests going back to the 1950s; an even higher percent not guilty today.

 

[kjw47]

The bigger problem is that the bibles say far too much that is not intended to be believed as literally true. Even this child abuse by the church might be interpreted as necessary for priests that are forbidden sexual gratification.

Are there any priests who are not guilty of diddling little boys?

All of the problems of this nature could be remedied by the church finally proclaiming that which is literally true in their bibles, and that which is not intended to be accepted as truth.

Even stories such as Jonah and the big fish, or Noah's ark, for two examples are still being questioned by the brighter members of the flock.

But instead, the brights among Catholics continue to not stir the pot with flock members who continue to claim that it's all quite true!

The Catholic church has taken the lead of allowing the flock to interpret the bibles as they choose, but the flock has ignored the message.

Catholicism=2Thess 2:3--They screwed it all up centuries ago. No protestant religion fixed much because they used Catholicism translating which was altered( removal of God's name) and translating errors to fit false council teachings. Here in these last days it has been fixed.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

One wrong that could be easily and quickly corrected is priests diddling little boys..

Simply declare all Catholic churches as unsafe for children unless the kids are kept within arms reach of their parents.

That will eliminate all the problems except child cruelty by indoctrination of them believing the lies of priests.

Priests diddling little boys is not a teaching of the Catholic Church. The Church should not have let itself be convinced to accept homosexuality.

 

[ding]

bb is a cyclical event true, energy to matter the confluent singularity ... its your popcorn from noting event that is not only groundless, hasn't a shred of evidence or such an event would not reoccur within the same universe, wave after wave.

almost as believable as christianity or any of the desert religions already the source of your mental derangement.

You are speaking gibberish.

 

[BreezeWood]

bb is a cyclical event - true, energy to matter the confluent singularity ... its your popcorn from noting event that is not only groundless, hasn't a shred of evidence or such an event would not reoccur within the same universe, wave after wave.

almost as believable as christianity or any of the desert religions already the source of your mental derangement.

You are speaking gibberish.

then ask your hired help - they already know and can guide you through for you to finally understand - mental derangement.

 

[ding]

then ask your hired help - they already know and can guide you through for you to finally understand - mental derangement.

Your boomerang theory is idiotic; fiction and fantasy. No evidence whatsoever.

 

[Donald H]

Are you in favor of closing all schools for the same reason? A greater percentage of teachers are also guilty.

The teachers in schools who are pedophiles, aren't given the opportunities that are given to priests, but I'm not in favour of closing either. Just supervision around priests is needed. The rest of the school classes might be adequate supervision.

Yes. Ninety-six percent of priests going back to the 1950s; an even higher percent not guilty today.

4% of priests who are caught and the others that aren't caught, is something quite different than 96% being innocent.

The 4% who get away with it could indicate as much as 50% or more that are getting away with it.

It's condoned by the Catholic church, as is proven by their tactic of moving priests who are proven guilty to another location.

All this aside for now, I'm more concerned over the fact that the Catholic flock has no understanding of what is believable in their bibles, and what is not intended to be believed literally. We'll always have something to talk about over that confusion. You're the only Catholic on the board who will even make the attempt to separate the literal true from the false.

It can't continue indefinitely. Educated people are asking questions that so far have no answers.

 

[Donald H]

Priests diddling little boys is not a teaching of the Catholic Church. The Church should not have let itself be convinced to accept homosexuality.

You're thinking that the Catholic church could survive without accepting homosexuality. You should be wondering if it could survive if it doesn't accept pedophilia in it's priests. Homosexuality in priests is accepted and it isn't an issue with that religion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Priests diddling little boys is not a teaching of the Catholic Church. The Church should not have let itself be convinced to accept homosexuality.

Low IQ bigots are easy to spot, when they conflate pedophilia with homosexuality.

 

[Donald H]

Low IQ bigots are easy to spot, when they conflate pedophilia with homosexuality.

The reaction of the Pope to pedophilia is partly responsible for the confusion.

The pope calls paedophile priests ‘children of God’

Francis pondered offering ‘Christian love’ to those who had destroyed children’s lives and Catholic church’s reputation

www.independent.co.uk

HE claims that the pedophile priests are children of his god. He should be proclaiming that they are the servants of Satan!

Exodus 21:7-10

English Standard Version

​

7 “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. 8 If she does not please her master, who has designated her[a] for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has broken faith with her. 9 If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter. 10 If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights.\
=============================================

And again there is confusion over what the bibles say, that can be either literal truth or literally false.

And Christians continue to refuse to clarify any of that which is questionable.

 

[Meriweather]

The teachers in schools who are pedophiles, aren't given the opportunities that are given to priests

What opportunities are given priests today? (The opportunities of a move in the late 1900s were also given to teachers...just move them to another school.) The most protected class of all were family members...the group that has a greater percentage of pedophilia than other groups....

 

[Meriweather]

It's condoned by the Catholic church, as is proven by their tactic of moving priests who are proven guilty to another location.

Bring yourself up-to-date. That has taken place for over a quarter of a century now.