What would it take to secure the Strait?

Read the news. Thirty thousand is the most conservative figure that was published by the international media.
On 16 January 2026, the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Mai Sato, said in a media interview that at least 5,000 people had been killed - then taking a blank guess and opinionated that maybe as much as 20,000 might have been killed.

If Mossad and the CIA wouldn't have instigated and payed thousands of LEFTISTS and criminals - to loot, arson and attack state security infrastructure - probably not even a 100 would have been killed.
 
I don't have to wait long for Drumph to make any mistakes when he makes 3 or 4 every day.



You think that Iran has only it's western borders. Hate to break it to you but Iran has pipelines and supply lines to the east as well.

map-of-iran-max.webp
Don't bother with that ignoramus, he doesn't even know where Tabriz is located - and that it beholds Iran's largest oil processing plant. Neither is he aware of the decades long and lucrative Iranian oil-swap with the Gulf-States.
 
Putin destroyed Russia and for thast the free world is grateful
Putin is still there, and he has control of one of the largest most powerful nuclear arsenals in the world. How he hasn't nuked Ukraine yet is the most baffling thing I've ever seen (not hoping for such a thing, but just using my common sense). If any other nation had the arsenal and ability the Russians have, and Ukraine was blowing the hell out of them (even though Russia had a goal to win in the beginning), then what do you all think a nation like Russia will finally do with that kind of fire power still intact and waiting to be used on it's supposed enemy ???

The world keeps talking about Russia as if it is about to be defeated, but is that actually the case or is the world about to witness one hellacious event administered by a nation that the world claims is on it heels and falling backwards in Ukraine ? Russia probably won't look to start WW3 anywhere else, but before Ukraine beats Russia in that war, I'm thinking that Russia will probably use a tactical nuke in hopes to finish Ukraines leadership, and finally end it's will to resist Russia any longer in that war.

Maybe I'm wrong, but what if I'm not ?

So much blustering and boasting in the world, but when it comes to a nuclear attack, that's when everyone takes pause and says oh wow it actually happened. We don't need that to happen, but if we all keep going down a path that is the wrong path concerning those two, then it could cause a small nation like Ukraine to actually believe that it could withstand a nuclear attack when it absolutely can't. Killing tanks and convoys is one thing, but stopping a nuclear attack is another thing that Ukraine doesn't want to try to stop because it can't and/or Ukraine should never want to experience something like that.

Losing control of diplomacy has become a tragic thing for Ukraine and Russia. Someone has to step up and be a peacemaker and nothing more.
It's time for them to talk or get serious about getting them to talk............. We can't control every battle space in the world, so we need to become peacemakers and not warmongers ourselves. It's time.
 
On 16 January 2026, the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran, Mai Sato, said in a media interview that at least 5,000 people had been killed - then taking a blank guess and opinionated that maybe as much as 20,000 might have been killed.

If Mossad and the CIA wouldn't have instigated and payed thousands of LEFTISTS and criminals - to loot, arson and attack state security infrastructure - probably not even a 100 would have been killed.
And you work for who ???
 
Putin is still there, and he has control of one of the largest most powerful nuclear arsenals in the world. How he hasn't nuked Ukraine yet is the most baffling thing I've ever seen (not hoping for such a thing, but just using my common sense). If any other nation had the arsenal and ability the Russians have, and Ukraine was blowing the hell out of them (even though Russia had a goal to win in the beginning), then what do you all think a nation like Russia will finally do with that kind of fire power still intact and waiting to be used on it's supposed enemy ???

The world keeps talking about Russia as if it is about to be defeated, but is that actually the case or is the world about to witness one hellacious event administered by a nation that the world claims is on it heels and falling backwards in Ukraine ? Russia probably won't look to start WW3 anywhere else, but before Ukraine beats Russia in that war, I'm thinking that Russia will probably use a tactical nuke in hopes to finish Ukraines leadership, and finally end it's will to resist Russia any longer in that war.

Maybe I'm wrong, but what if I'm not ?

So much blustering and boasting in the world, but when it comes to a nuclear attack, that's when everyone takes pause and says oh wow it actually happened. We don't need that to happen, but if we all keep going down a path that is the wrong path concerning those two, then it could cause a small nation like Ukraine to actually believe that it could withstand a nuclear attack when it absolutely can't. Killing tanks and convoys is one thing, but stopping a nuclear attack is another thing that Ukraine doesn't want to try to stop because it can't and/or Ukraine should never want to experience something like that.

Losing control of diplomacy has become a tragic thing for Ukraine and Russia. Someone has to step up and be a peacemaker and nothing more.
It's time for them to talk or get serious about getting them to talk............. We can't control every battle space in the world, so we need to become peacemakers and not warmongers ourselves. It's time.
The USA is the primary reason for the Ukraine-Russian war - Peacemaker my ass.

It is also noteworthy, that off all USMB members, ONLY MAGA cretins call for using nuclear weapons - clearly brainless warmongers who got no clue about what nuclear deterrence is about.
 
The USA is the primary reason for the Ukraine-Russian war - Peacemaker my ass.

Well, Comrade. Well said for a Putin follower. The war started in 2012. Putin had already shown he would invade, take territory and then blame someone else for starting it. The facts remains that had Putin not invaded, there would be no war.

It is also noteworthy, that off all USMB members, ONLY MAGA cretins call for using nuclear weapons - clearly brainless warmongers who got no clue about what nuclear deterrence is about.

Scary, ain't it considering that it's the Head Magat with his finger on the red button.
 
Back
Top Bottom