Zone1 What do you have to say about trinity keeping all the religions in mind?

[Cougarbear]

Reality= God inspired the bible, he put his personal name in those pages-7000 spots, by satans will men removed that name to mislead, altering Gods will to support satans will. The NWT put that name back, the clergys of darkness who have supported satans will on that matter over Gods will, condemned the translators of the NWT for putting Gods name back= the darkness. Best believe Jesus--Matt 7:21--Only those living( now) to do( and support) his Fathers will get to enter his kingdom. You see? Satan beat billions centuries ago. You dont have to remain in that darkness, but it seems to be your choice because you lack the facts of reality.

Without a prophet, your men changed the everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ. Your scholars have no authority to do so.
There are similarities with the LDS and JWs in that it's clear that the concept of the 3 beings Father, Son and Holy Spirit are separate beings. So, it's obvious that JWs stole that concept from Joseph Smith. The difference is that LDS believe the Father is not Jehovah, but Elohim. The Son is Jehovah who came to the earth as Jesus Christ. LDS believe the three personages are all part of the Godhead or God. JWs do not believe Jesus is God or part of the Godhead of three. Yet, JW's now claim they have never had a prophet of God to tell them this. Instead, they just make up stuff.

 

[Indeependent]

CNN no doubt... No wonder you have the facts wrong. https://oic-oci.org/upload/islamophobia/2014/en/8MB-aug-en.pdf
This says 15 to 25%. I say 15% is more accurate. And, as far as extremism, probably more like 1-5%.

I go with AP News and Reuters.

 

[kjw47]

Without a prophet, your men changed the everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ. Your scholars have no authority to do so.
There are similarities with the LDS and JWs in that it's clear that the concept of the 3 beings Father, Son and Holy Spirit are separate beings. So, it's obvious that JWs stole that concept from Joseph Smith. The difference is that LDS believe the Father is not Jehovah, but Elohim. The Son is Jehovah who came to the earth as Jesus Christ. LDS believe the three personages are all part of the Godhead or God. JWs do not believe Jesus is God or part of the Godhead of three. Yet, JW's now claim they have never had a prophet of God to tell them this. Instead, they just make up stuff.

Your own Greek lexicons( trinity translation) proves 100% the error at John 1:1 of a capitol G God in the last line. A Greek scholar in 1822 compared the Greek to English side by side in his NT translation and proved to the world-a god is correct. Rejected of course by trinity clergys it proves they are false religion, they cannot have that, they wouldnt exist. Billions of dollars would be thrown away, not to mention 2 billion mislead followers very angry for being duped.

 

[hobelim]

Your own Greek lexicons( trinity translation) proves 100% the error at John 1:1 of a capitol G God in the last line. A Greek scholar in 1822 compared the Greek to English side by side in his NT translation and proved to the world-a god is correct. Rejected of course by trinity clergys it proves they are false religion, they cannot have that, they wouldnt exist. Billions of dollars would be thrown away, not to mention 2 billion mislead followers very angry for being duped.

Right.

Ho Theos means God. Theos without the definite article Ho before it just means 'like God.'

And the word (logos) was with Ho Theos, God, and the word (logos) was theos, like God.

 

[Cougarbear]

I go with AP News and Reuters.

Yet, you show us nothing. I give you facts from an actual reference and one more accurate than the liberal AP and Reuters.

 

[Cougarbear]

Your own Greek lexicons( trinity translation) proves 100% the error at John 1:1 of a capitol G God in the last line. A Greek scholar in 1822 compared the Greek to English side by side in his NT translation and proved to the world-a god is correct. Rejected of course by trinity clergys it proves they are false religion, they cannot have that, they wouldnt exist. Billions of dollars would be thrown away, not to mention 2 billion mislead followers very angry for being duped.

From your Bible, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god." Same as in the King James Version, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." Same. You want to make a big deal over a small "g" and a capital "G." I actually agree that the Word is not the Father. Emphasize that with a small "g." I'm fine. It still says "god." Jesus is a god or better understood, the Son of God. Second in command. So. our differences is really the name of God and god. Or, the name of the Father and the name of the Son. The Son does not usurp the Father's authority. Never did and never will. But the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are all three Gods. You can write God, god, god. So what? We say from a Prophet of God, the name of the Father is Elohim. You say the Father's name is Jehovah. Muslims say it's Allah. I'll take it from a Prophet of Jesus Christ.

 

[Indeependent]

Yet, you show us nothing. I give you facts from an actual reference and one more accurate than the liberal AP and Reuters.

It's easy to Link to bleeding heart articles.
I like people who keep up with the news on a daily basis; it's called being a responsible adult.

 

[irosie91]

You have just shown that there is something in common with those evil persons within 3 different groups that are apposed to one another in doctrine and beliefs. Here's how I would properly write your sentence: There is no question that insane Christians and insane Muslims and insane Atheists have mastered the art of murder. In the 20th century and part of the 21st century, who were the insane Christians and insane Muslims? Mao, Stalin, Hitler were Atheists. Hitler thought Aryans were descendants of aliens from another world who landed here 40,000 years ago and were white powerful beings. So, the common thread is "insanity." Most Christians are not this. Most Muslims are not this. Most Atheists are not this.
I would disagree also on using the word, insanity as the reason for the actions of Mao, Stalin and Hitler. Their actions were derived by a thirst for power and wealth. They used communism and fascism as modes to gain control over their people. Poverty within their countries was used to find scapegoats to kill in order to regain control over their financial troubles in their countries. While the United States has used capitalism with a welfare net to accomplish this. However, in the U.S. people like Margaret Sanger saw eugenics and abortion as a way to reduce poverty amongst blacks in the ghettos. The Democrat Party today is doing the same thing moving ever so close to communist tyranny because they refuse to use capitalism. Instead, they punish capitalism and promote socialism. Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground in the 60's and 70's communist movement was heard to say by the mole, Larry Grathwohl, that they want to tear down the capitalist U.S. and may have to kill 10% of the population that will not be brainwashed in their re-education camps. That's 33 million people today that these insane people are ready to wipe out. We see some of this in our education system with CTR and gender confusion camps called the government school system. All Atheists and all insane.

correction Margaret Sanger saw abortion and birth control as a way of avoiding huge Irish catholic impoverished families with starving children. The black emphasis is
propaganda

 

[Cougarbear]

It's easy to Link to bleeding heart articles.
I like people who keep up with the news on a daily basis; it's called being a responsible adult.

Ya, ya, ya...you made a statement without any facts or references. That isn't my job. That's yours. So, show me.

 

[Cougarbear]

correction Margaret Sanger saw abortion and birth control as a way of avoiding huge Irish catholic impoverished families with starving children. The black emphasis is
propaganda

Prove your theory about Sanger. We all know she was a racist and wanted to eliminate the Black race through abortion. She had nothing to do with what was happening with Catholics. That's not where the poverty was anyways.

 

[irosie91]

Prove your theory about Sanger. We all know she was a racist and wanted to eliminate the Black race through abortion. She had nothing to do with what was happening with Catholics. That's not where the poverty was anyways.

That which YOU ALL KNOW----has nothing to do with the reality of her career. You may have been influenced by the writings of persons with
political agendas. There is no way for me to answer utterly uninformed BELIEF. I will make a futile attempt. IN REALITY Sanger was
responding to HER OWN EXPERIENCE as a
child in a very large impoverished IRISH CATHOLIC family. HER FIRST CONCERN was that miserable experience and how she thought that such situations could be avoided. She made some very unfortunate comments about impoverished black families that have been MAGNIFIED as her "REAL"
and "ONLY" agenda <<<< bullshit. Also important in the evolution of her thinking was the fact that New York City was the site of a HUGE INFLUX of impoverished blacks from the South in the second half of the 19th century---when Irish, escaping the famine in Ireland and blacks escaping the south vied for any and all available low level work, housing and space in the gutters and in the back alleys where abortions "happened" The situation was not conducive to good relations

 

[Indeependent]

Ya, ya, ya...you made a statement without any facts or references. That isn't my job. That's yours. So, show me.

I have no investment in your refusal to read the 2 news sites that I provided.
How lazy can you be?

 

[kjw47]

Right.

Ho Theos means God. Theos without the definite article Ho before it just means 'like God.'

And the word (logos) was with Ho Theos, God, and the word (logos) was theos, like God.

Yes like god, or a god small g. Satan is called Theos at 2 Cor 4:4-small g god, and God Ho Theos later in that verse. Same rule applies in both spots.

 

[kjw47]

From your Bible, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god." Same as in the King James Version, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." Same. You want to make a big deal over a small "g" and a capital "G." I actually agree that the Word is not the Father. Emphasize that with a small "g." I'm fine. It still says "god." Jesus is a god or better understood, the Son of God. Second in command. So. our differences is really the name of God and god. Or, the name of the Father and the name of the Son. The Son does not usurp the Father's authority. Never did and never will. But the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are all three Gods. You can write God, god, god. So what? We say from a Prophet of God, the name of the Father is Elohim. You say the Father's name is Jehovah. Muslims say it's Allah. I'll take it from a Prophet of Jesus Christ.

The difference a capitol G GOD and a lower case g god . The lower case means--has godlike qualities it is not calling that one The God. Many are mislead by that capitol G God in the last line at John 1:1--mislead into breaking Gods #1 commandment daily. Not a wise place to be standing. But satan and his teachers have transformed into angels of light( 2Cor 11:12-15) and are misleading 99% on this earth.

 

[Cougarbear]

That which YOU ALL KNOW----has nothing to do with the reality of her career. You may have been influenced by the writings of persons with
political agendas. There is no way for me to answer utterly uninformed BELIEF. I will make a futile attempt. IN REALITY Sanger was
responding to HER OWN EXPERIENCE as a
child in a very large impoverished IRISH CATHOLIC family. HER FIRST CONCERN was that miserable experience and how she thought that such situations could be avoided. She made some very unfortunate comments about impoverished black families that have been MAGNIFIED as her "REAL"
and "ONLY" agenda <<<< bullshit. Also important in the evolution of her thinking was the fact that New York City was the site of a HUGE INFLUX of impoverished blacks from the South in the second half of the 19th century---when Irish, escaping the famine in Ireland and blacks escaping the south vied for any and all available low level work, housing and space in the gutters and in the back alleys where abortions "happened" The situation was not conducive to good relations

WOW, abort black children so white Irish Catholic children can be born instead and take the work to feed their families. Racist for sure! Where is BLM and CRT when you need them...

 

[Cougarbear]

I have no investment in your refusal to read the 2 news sites that I provided.
How lazy can you be?

Ya right...

 

[Cougarbear]

The difference a capitol G GOD and a lower case g god . The lower case means--has godlike qualities it is not calling that one The God. Many are mislead by that capitol G God in the last line at John 1:1--mislead into breaking Gods #1 commandment daily. Not a wise place to be standing. But satan and his teachers have transformed into angels of light( 2Cor 11:12-15) and are misleading 99% on this earth.

There you go again. Moving goal posts instead of just admitting that Jesus is a god. He's the second in command. The Father, The Son and The Holy Ghost. The word is "god" or "Lord." Of course god or Lord has godlike qualities. He's God's Son! There is One Father, One Son, and One Holy Ghost. All three make the Godhead. They agree in one and purpose.

 

[irosie91]

WOW, abort black children so white Irish Catholic children can be born instead and take the work to feed their families. Racist for sure! Where is BLM and CRT when you need them...

nope-----but your statement is sorta AL LA MODE

 

[kjw47]

There you go again. Moving goal posts instead of just admitting that Jesus is a god. He's the second in command. The Father, The Son and The Holy Ghost. The word is "god" or "Lord." Of course god or Lord has godlike qualities. He's God's Son! There is One Father, One Son, and One Holy Ghost. All three make the Godhead. They agree in one and purpose.

Satan is called Theos at 2 Cor 4:4--he is not-The God, God is called HoTheos at 2 Cor 4:4--same translating rule applies in both spots.

 

[Cougarbear]

nope-----but your statement is sorta AL LA MODE

Gotchya...