We Need Socialism.

[Highlight]

If Socialism is SO GREAT, then WHY are MILLIONS of people a year FLEEING from Socialist countries to the USA???

If Socialism is SO GREAT, then WHY aren't these people living the high life in their own countries? WHY are they leaving everything behind and grabbing whatever flight, boat, or raft they can to come HERE?????

HUH?????

Because of overpopulation, you idiot.

 

[Highlight]

America's economic model isn't going to change, so you might as well pack up and move to a socialist country.

You can't have capitalism without mass marketing of goods and services. The poor buy these goods and services, thus making the rich richer.

Even poor people have smartphones, internet, ac, vehicles, free food, etc. Is this a great country or what.

When I was among the working poor I didn't feel exploited because I knew I was going to advance. Many of the poor are entry level workers, but don't remain so very long.

It's a rich county that can afford 15 million unfilled job positions and still thrive economically. In a socialist country those 15 million would be paid by the state to stand around doing nothing.

I said it before and I'll say it again. **** you and your "blame the poor" bullshit.

 

[Highlight]

This is not a Class warfare. It is nationalism at it's last stage - nazism. Nothing to do with Left.

If only it were Nazism. Hitler stood for the working class. Stalin was the real villain. Anybody who believes otherwise has "drank the Kool Aid."

 

[Woodznutz]

I said it before and I'll say it again. **** you and your "blame the poor" bullshit.

I don't "blame" them per se, but it is mostly their responsibility for their economic condition, just as I am responsible for mine.

 

[egp320i]

Not communism, but socialism. There is a difference. For instance, Hitler and the National Socialists were against the communists. (And for VERY good reasons) Under Hitler and the National Socialists, the German economy went from ruined to the greatest economy in the world! Also, the only to defeat the Chinese communists is with a socialist system. But the capitalists cringe at the thought. Why? Because there is no way a for profit company could compete with a government run company. For one reason, profit would be taken out of the equation. Also, we could make anything the Chinese make for less than they can. Because our country is rich in natural resources. As long as the government can provide the necessities that are needed to live, such as housing, food and clothing, things can be made for a very cheap price. But here is a cartoon from 1897 that shows the problem when it comes to, for example, housing. (How things haven't changed)

View attachment 1120240

Though he was an asshole, Muammar Gaddafi took a socialist approach when it came to housing. He required by law that every citizen had a place to live. He also made it illegal to own more than one house. Another point is that here in the U.S., the working poor on average spend around 55% of their income on rent. To that add the cost of food, clothing, utilities, insurance, etc., that doesn't leave people with much else. Also each year around 500,000 families go bankrupt due to medical expenses. It's all a pile of shit that only socialism can lift us out of. You should also consider what these two people had to say.

View attachment 1120243

Socialism everybody is equal......equally POOR [your government holds all YOU money]

imaging working hard to get a doctorate in engineering yet you are paid the same as the garbage man, why would you both, for the common good? no you do it because you are smart and have a better life as you will make more money

if you like a caste system check out India

 

[dblack]

That needs to change.

No. It doesn't. That was by design. Government gets a monopoly on coercion, we the people control the rest.

 

[gipper]

That needs to change.

Yes, but there doesn’t appear to be any effort in the works to change it.

How many Americans even know about the globalist organizations controlling the world? How many Americans will dispute it when shown the evidence? Few seem aware of organizations like Bilderberg Group, CFR, or the WEF to name a few?

 

[Ringo]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What did he do?

 

[Highlight]

I don't "blame" them per se, but it is mostly their responsibility for their economic condition, just as I am responsible for mine.

No. It was people like Andrew Carnegie. He viewed the poor working conditions, low pay, long hours 7 days a week as "survival of the fittest." As if he was actually doing humanity a favor. When what he was actually doing was stuffing his pockets with as much money as they could hold. There are those who tried to change things. That led to things like the 1927 Columbine Mine Massacre, the 1914 Ludlow Massacre, the 1912 Textile Strike in Lawerence, Massachusetts, the 1916 Anaconda Road Massacre, the 1927 Lattimer Massacre, the 1921 Battle for Blair Mountain, etc etc etc. The wealthy being above the law is the reason for the condition of the poor. Also, this video shows how many of the wealthy become "responsible" for their economic condition. I say NO to aristocracy!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No. It was people like Andrew Carnegie. He viewed the poor working conditions, low pay, long hours 7 days a week as "survival of the fittest." As if he was actually doing humanity a favor. When what he was actually doing was stuffing his pockets with as much money as they could hold. There are those who tried to change things. That led to things like the 1927 Columbine Mine Massacre, the 1914 Ludlow Massacre, the 1912 Textile Strike in Lawerence, Massachusetts, the 1916 Anaconda Road Massacre, the 1927 Lattimer Massacre, the 1921 Battle for Blair Mountain, etc etc etc. The wealthy being above the law is the reason for the condition of the poor. Also, this video shows how many of the wealthy become "responsible" for their economic condition. I say NO to aristocracy!

View attachment 1141779

When I want to learn about economics, I listen to a Marxist economist.

Because every Marxist economy failed. DURR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No. It was people like Andrew Carnegie. He viewed the poor working conditions, low pay, long hours 7 days a week as "survival of the fittest." As if he was actually doing humanity a favor. When what he was actually doing was stuffing his pockets with as much money as they could hold. There are those who tried to change things. That led to things like the 1927 Columbine Mine Massacre, the 1914 Ludlow Massacre, the 1912 Textile Strike in Lawerence, Massachusetts, the 1916 Anaconda Road Massacre, the 1927 Lattimer Massacre, the 1921 Battle for Blair Mountain, etc etc etc. The wealthy being above the law is the reason for the condition of the poor. Also, this video shows how many of the wealthy become "responsible" for their economic condition. I say NO to aristocracy!

View attachment 1141779

Owners get earnings from what they own. That's awful!

What did Wolff produce to get paid? What factory did he work in?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Facts are facts, Kid. Hitler was an extreme right wing authoritarian. Deal with it.

Yeah... no.
He was a psychopathic narcissist, suffered from constant paranoia and also had a dramatic superiority complex.
He was of no political persuasion other than whatever it took to get in power. He suffered from grand illusions that completely hid not only his own faults from himself, but the impossibilities of what he thoroughly believed would happen.
Extreme right wing leader example would be Franco Francisco who ruled Spain from 1939 to 1975.
It should be noted that he did not trust Hitler, did not like Hitler and outsmarted and out maneuvered him and kept Spain out of the war. He cooperated with Hitler's Germany for his own interest and was a TRUE nationalist.

The only extreme Hitler was - was insanity.

 

[dblack]

He was a psychopathic narcissist, suffered from constant paranoia and also had a dramatic superiority complex.
He was of no political persuasion other than whatever it took to get in power. He suffered from grand illusions that completely hid not only his own faults from himself, but the impossibilities of what he thoroughly believed would happen.

That sure sounds like Trump. Was that intentional?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

That sure sounds like Trump. Was that intentional?

 

[Ringo]

Dont mix socialism with liberalism

 

[MarcATL]

Socialism always fails.

Socialist governments are the most successful governments producing the happiest and most satisfied citizens today.

What the **** are you smoking?

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah... no.

But yes.

 

[AZrailwhale]

That sure sounds like Trump. Was that intentional?

Is it paranoia if they ARE really out to get you? Trump was a liberal favorite until he decided to run for president as a Republican. Suddenly he became the spawn of Satan to the democrats.

 

[saveliberty]

Socialism has failed every nation that has seriously adopted it.