Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nothing you claim has been proven. There isn't even evidence that any of the documents are classified. even if they are marked as classified, that doesn't mean they haven't been declassified.For the record Lisa, you are not required to provide any content with a video, link or picture unless it’s the opening post of a thread. Zinc did not make mistake.
That may not true. This is uncharted legal territory because no president up to now has been so cavalier with the process or with our national security. Trump’s vindictiveness is overriding OUR national security.
To declassify a document the president is supposed to follow a process can declassify that leaves a paper trail ending in changing the classification marks. You know how the fed bureaucracy is…everything in triplicate with a zillion sign offs and an entire forest decimated for paper.
In addition certain documents CANNOT be declassified by the president alone, like nuclear secrets.
Consider the levels of classification and what was found in Mara Lago: What to know about government classification of secrets
Top Secret
This is the highest level of classification. Information is classified as Top Secret if it "reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security," according to a 2009 executive order that describes the classification system.
A subset of Top Secret documents known as SCI, or sensitive compartmentedinformation, is reserved for certain information derived from intelligence sources. Access to an SCI document can be even further restricted to a smaller group of people with specific security clearances.
Some of the materials recovered from Trump's Florida home were marked as Top Secret SCI.
What was he doing with boxes of unsecured TS and and SCI documents for heavens sakes? I can’t why rightists, who have always prioritized national security suddenly don’t.
It is unlikely this will result in criminal charges, for one, it is again uncharted legal territory regarding a former president, and for another, the main reason for the raid seems to be getting those documents back.
Trump is again demonstrating what happens when a system that has long depended on the integrity and lawfulness it’s users to function confronts a person who has neither, and uncovers horrible lack of guardrails.
Also consider this. In Trumps end of term frenzy of attempted declassification, he wanted no redactions which means the identities of confidential informants, spies etc would be revealed. Can you imagine how damaging that would be?
I think the low here is in what Trump had in his possession and tbe yet to be reason’s for it.
I don’t think he will be just based on what we currently know. I think the priority was to get the documents.I will start the bidding. Thirty days. By making the raid he has to be charged with something or the AG resign.
What was he doing with boxes of unsecured TS and and SCI documents for heavens sakes? I can’t why rightists, who have always prioritized national security suddenly don’t.
Which is a violation.she made a specific post claiming something in regards a mod so blow it out you ass.
At a minimum, under the Presidential records act, he is not supposed to have those documents. That can be proven.Nothing you claim has been proven. There isn't even evidence that any of the documents are classified. even if they are marked as classified, that doesn't mean they haven't been declassified.
As usual, the Dims are making all manner of assumptions that aren't supported by any facts.
Read this slowly.Nothing you claim has been proven. There isn't even evidence that any of the documents are classified. even if they are marked as classified, that doesn't mean they haven't been declassified.
As usual, the Dims are making all manner of assumptions that aren't supported by any facts.
Another quick question.... where is the evidence that in fact ANY TS or Skiff or defense material was there?At a minimum, under the Presidential records act, he is not supposed to have those documents. That can be proven.
In regards to declassification, the last step is changing the markers, and that had not been done.
Doesn’t it bother you that TS/SCI documents could have been unilaterally “declassified” in a fit of peak like that?
Good point.I never worked a Top Secret program but worked with people who did.
When they were no longer working that program, their Top Secret Clearance was revoked.
Why would an Ex President with a grudge against the Government be allowed to maintain Top Secret Documents?
What would you accept as evidence?Another quick question.... where is the evidence that in fact ANY TS or Skiff or defense material was there?
Read the inventory of recovered docs numb nutsAnother quick question.... where is the evidence that in fact ANY TS or Skiff or defense material was there?
An actual Statement from the Government via an ACTUAL identified person in authority or from Trump or his lawyers.What would you accept as evidence?
Another quick question.... where is the evidence that in fact ANY TS or Skiff or defense material was there?
Because he’s a Republican – but you knew that already.Actually, one of the acceptable protocols at the time was wiping the phones and then smashing them. So no, that doesn’t bother me. Clinton was careless with security, we held numerous hearings and deposed her. She testified under oath. Why aren’t you demanding Trump go through the same process?
LOL Lesh claims there is an inventory link to it and show it is the ACTUAL inventory they have.You think they need to show Top Secret evidence to YOU?
An actual Statement from the Government via an ACTUAL identified person in authority or from Trump or his lawyers.
This fails as a red herring fallacy – a failed, dishonest attempt to deflect.Literally instructing your staff to take actual hammers and smash their cell phones is pretty serious also.
Knowingly sending your computers/servers to a company without security clearance to wipe data to prevent discovery is also serious.
I guess that didn't upset you though.
Is it the opening post?HEY MOD! You can’t just post a link. Give us a summary of what the NYT is saying.
Your neighbor cannot report to the police that they smelled pot and at a later date the police storm the home.You couldn't be more wrong.
If a neighbor swears under penalty of perjury that they witnessed you smoking or possessing pot (or any other illegal object, such a felon with a firearm), and a warrant is issued to gather evidence of that crime.
A) No evidence is found - Anything taken due to the warrant is an illegal search. The person swearing the affidavit can be prosecuted for perjury. (see the police in the Breanna Taylor case as an example)
B) They find what was in the warrant. The warrant is 100% valid, and any materials taken, including not in the warrant but in plain sight, are legal evidence.
Thx. I didn’t realize it was only the opening post that requires content around a link. This will save me time in the future.Is it the opening post?
Nope. So nothing to see here.
