- Jan 24, 2015
- Reaction score
- Alta California, federalist.
It has to do with the fact that it exists, has even paid out multimillion dollar bonuses and not even the Right Wing opposes that more than they do non-corporate welfare for the Poor.What does corporate welfare have to do with anything and why do you think I support it? Stop bringing in unrelated things in a vain attempt to distract from the main point. The fact remains, ALL government spending has to come from taxpayers.A disingenuous argument. The same could be said for corporate welfare; stop being such hypocrites toward the Poor, right wingers.Think though. Any capital you want to use has to come from working people through taxes. More government spending means more money taken from working people. Even you want to raise MW just to increase tax revenue.It sounds like using capitalism for all of its capital worth to me. Capital should be doing the "heavy lifting" in a first world economy.Think about what you're saying. You're saying that the government should TAX the people already working so it can give some to the people who WON'T work so it can turn around and take some from them. Do you not hear how foolish that is?
This is what we are supposed to be doing with the tax monies we pay for Government:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.