Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So marriage is not just about fucking, but gay marriage is? How FUCKING stupid are you anyway?Nope, but it sure the fuck isn’t two men either. Send that back to the states as well. You won’t even have homo marriage in CA.
He doesn't even know. He's just a frustrated, angry little failure who picks out easy targets to attack to make himself feel better.So marriage is not just about fucking, but gay marriage is? How FUCKING stupid are you anyway?
Do you have any understanding of the concepts of due process and equal protection under the law? Are you really that contemptuous of the constitution?
This is exactly my thought on the subject. I voted Democrat and thought I was a pretty liberal dude but the Democrats are way more liberal than I ever could have imagined. I vote Republican now but I try to use common sense, I don't like them either.Most people, including us liberals do not approve of late term abortions in most cases.
The compromise that most anti abortion people refuse to make is, if we seriously restrict or outlaw abortion, lets support social safety net programs like health care, nutritional programs, paid family leave and affordable day care to name just a few. Those who do not support those things are not pro life. They are full of shit
Apparently you aren’t very convinced that ruling is based on anything solid.No you weren't, you insufferable little twat. We had to take it from you bigoted religious dumbfucks via a scotus ruling. Pick up a book once in a while, your brains have turned to sewage.
No, I think it has a solid enough basis to be upheld as precedent. The SCOTUS agreed with me many times, over nearly 50 years.Apparently you aren’t very convinced that ruling is based on anything solid.
And it’s this sort of ignorance, bigotry, and hate that warrants defending the rights of gay and transgender Americans.Nope, but it sure the fuck isn’t two men either. Send that back to the states as well. You won’t even have homo marriage in CA.
Changes in sexual mores over that last century has made marriage, unnecessary for sexual relationships. Like heterosexuals, many lesbian, gay and bisexual people want to form stable, long-lasting relationships based on love or companionship. Sexual relations is no longer the major reason for marriage.So marriage is not just about fucking, but gay marriage is? How FUCKING stupid are you anyway?
Do you have any understanding of the concepts of due process and equal protection under the law? Are you really that contemptuous of the constitution?
I know that but certain others don't seem toChanges in sexual mores over that last century has made marriage, unnecessary for sexual relationships. Like heterosexuals, many lesbian, gay and bisexual people want to form stable, long-lasting relationships based on love or companionship. Sexual relations is no longer the major reason for marriage.
. . However there are going to be some unexpected results other allowing states to control abortion. . .
Children and family is the major reason for marriage among the truly faithful in the Abrahamic religions, which accounts for a third of the world. You presume too much.. . . . Sexual relations is no longer the major reason for marriage.
Changes in sexual mores over that last century has made marriage, unnecessary for sexual relationships. Like heterosexuals, many lesbian, gay and bisexual people want to form stable, long-lasting relationships based on love or companionship. Sexual relations is no longer the major reason for marriage.
Children and family is the major reason for marriage among the truly faithful in the Abrahamic religions, which accounts for a third of the world. You presume too much.
When discussing the overturning of Rowe V Wade, all discussions focused on abortion. However there are going to be some unexpected results other allowing states to control abortion.
Reading the draft opinion, the underpinnings for the decision is no constitutional basis for Rowe therefore it is a state not a federal issue. The draft went into details explaining why there was no implied right to abortion and thus the 4th and 16th amendment were not applicable. With this majority opinion it becomes clear that there is more going on than just giving states control over abortion.
As has been mentioned elsewhere, this ruling undermines a number of other federal rulings for example the states right to forbid interracial marriage as well as gay marriages. It also weakens the case for federal laws managing healthcare such as HIPPA and Obamacare, federal aid to education, etc. It is a huge victory for state rights with the potential to totally upend the America we know.
Another result of the ruling is political. Will support for antiabortion in the Republican party be as strong after Rowe is overturned as before? I think not. Support for antiabortion in the Republican Party comes from the religious right and the anti-big government crowd who strongly favor states rights. When Rowe is law of the land, these two groups were united in the desire abolish federal protection for abortion. With state control of abortion there is going to be less enthusiasm for antiabortion within the party. Over the last 20 years, 30% of the party has become a member on a non-Christian religion or none at all. The second reason I think that support is going to drop is that the big national battle is over. Although there will be fighting in most states, in some states it will just be a non-issue.
Before the court draft came out, I was reading articles about republicans getting full control of government in 2024 and passing anti-abortion legislation that would make abortion illegal in the US. It seems that the court deciding that abortion is a state issue has shot that down removing any hope of a united country on this issue.
Another post reportedLol, the butchers in the blue states will still murder babies so you're all good.
Ok, thanks for the advice, now mind your business.Families based on the marriage between a man and a woman, committed to each other, and to the care of the children that they jointly produce, has always been, and will always be, the foundation of every stable human society.
No society has ever existed of any size, for very long, that deviated very far from this model; and none ever will.
To discard this foundation is to set into motion the ultimate collapse of any society.
Art 3 of the US Constitution created the court dumbass99% of what is in the constitution is exactly as it should be. it is what is missing that is causing the problems. All constitutions require interpretation but since our constitution is long on powers, short on rights, and very difficult to change it has to be liberally interpreted. The founders were so concerned about limiting power of government that all our rights were an after thought. The Supreme Court which is on equal footing with Congress and Executive branch is not even mentioned in the constitution.
Then WTF are you crying about?No, I think it has a solid enough basis to be upheld as precedent. The SCOTUS agreed with me many times, over nearly 50 years.
Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you have been in a coma. Read a newspaper lately?Then WTF are you crying about?
Call me all the names you want. Doesn’t change a group of mental cases behavior into normal.And it’s this sort of ignorance, bigotry, and hate that warrants defending the rights of gay and transgender Americans.
