TV news coverage of Trump 93% negative.

[Nostra]

And yet, my point about political and cultural trends crossing borders, is still valid and not even contradicted by what you just posted.


So, what was that? Just a flat denial with some slight pretense wrapping?


Ether way, the point stands. The media lies. YOu defend their lies. YOu lie in defense of their lies.


Because it advances your political agenda.


You are a far left ideologue, of the worst sort.

Your point has no merit

It is not a Democratic conspiracy to make Trump look bad. An independent, international press with their own issues and concerns report on what Trump says and does

They report the same outrage our press does

If that was true, they would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.


Your own actions, demonstrate that you do not believe your own stated position.

Telling what Trump has said and reporting what he does is not a lie

But lying about what he said, is lying.


As you well know. Every post you make pretending otherwise, is a lie.

Video and Trump Tweets do not lie

They show a President who is untrustworthy, a bully, prone to petty insults and inept

Liar.

 

[Nostra]

He ought to consider himself lucky it's only 93%...

Given the state of the alt-left 'mainstream" media, you may be right.

 

[Nostra]

The only real question; is why the press lets Trump get away with as much as he does?​

I would agree with you, but we would both be wrong.

 

[rightwinger]

Telling what Trump has said and reporting what he does is not a lie

What you claim he said, and what you report he does, is lies.

BTW, love your sig...........not many people publicly announce that anyone they agree with is wrong.

We claim based on what he tweets and what he says

No need to lie

Yet you do. So, your actions prove what you said to be false.

Liar

Were you lying when you came up with your sig?

Do you really admit that anyone you agree with is wrong?

Do you really struggle so much with the English Language?
You were a short bus regular, weren’t you?

Do you know what the word ....IF means?
Namely, IF I agreed with you, that would make me as wrong as you are

 

[candycorn]

93% of the crap he does is negative.

Next!

Gee, if the Senate would call witnesses from the administration, I’m sure it would improve the narrative.

 

[candycorn]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Nothing more tedious and ridiculous than conservatives whining about ‘the media.’

true

 

[Nostra]

What you claim he said, and what you report he does, is lies.

BTW, love your sig...........not many people publicly announce that anyone they agree with is wrong.

We claim based on what he tweets and what he says

No need to lie

Yet you do. So, your actions prove what you said to be false.

Liar

Were you lying when you came up with your sig?

Do you really admit that anyone you agree with is wrong?

Do you really struggle so much with the English Language?
You were a short bus regular, weren’t you?

Do you know what the word ....IF means?
Namely, IF I agreed with you, that would make me as wrong as you are

Why does that word make any difference?

Ok, IF you agree with someone they are wrong.

Better?

Fucking moron.

 

[SAYIT]

Can you democrats tell the truth and win an election?? Lol

Not at the same time.

 

[rightwinger]

We claim based on what he tweets and what he says

No need to lie

Yet you do. So, your actions prove what you said to be false.

Liar

Were you lying when you came up with your sig?

Do you really admit that anyone you agree with is wrong?

Do you really struggle so much with the English Language?
You were a short bus regular, weren’t you?

Do you know what the word ....IF means?
Namely, IF I agreed with you, that would make me as wrong as you are

Why does that word make any difference?

Ok, IF you agree with someone they are wrong.

Better?

Fucking moron.

Nice try Short Bus

Try this

 

[j-mac]

We already know what you leftists think of America

Leftists found this country

The same people who said God gave us our rights which includes gun ownership and government must be small and limited?

Those Leftists?

Hilarious.

Where does it ever say government should be small and limited
The Constitution does not mention god

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

 

[rightwinger]

Leftists found this country

The same people who said God gave us our rights which includes gun ownership and government must be small and limited?

Those Leftists?

Hilarious.

Where does it ever say government should be small and limited
The Constitution does not mention god

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

 

[j-mac]

The same people who said God gave us our rights which includes gun ownership and government must be small and limited?

Those Leftists?

Hilarious.

Where does it ever say government should be small and limited
The Constitution does not mention god

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

Yep...however, if they want to limit them they will do that too....I guess when Trump is re elected that will be step in that process.

 

[rightwinger]

Where does it ever say government should be small and limited
The Constitution does not mention god

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

Yep...however, if they want to limit them they will do that too....I guess when Trump is re elected that will be step in that process.

Why hasn’t Trump limited Government?

He has increased spending

 

[Nostra]

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

Yep...however, if they want to limit them they will do that too....I guess when Trump is re elected that will be step in that process.

Why hasn’t Trump limited Government?

He has increased spending

Nazi controls the purse strings.

BTW....love your sig. It's not often someone admits publicly that anyone they agree with is wrong.

 

[j-mac]

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

Yep...however, if they want to limit them they will do that too....I guess when Trump is re elected that will be step in that process.

Why hasn’t Trump limited Government?

He has increased spending

He did? All by himself I suppose....Do you even know how this works?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Declaration says our Rights come from God.

And if you think the Founding Fathers felt the government should be large and intrude in our daily lives, you’re a liar or stupid. Or both.

Declaration is not a legal enforceable document, it is a declaration of grievances and breaking free from England

If the Founding Fathers thought we shouldn’t have a large government they would have specified in the Constitution

Instead, they left it up to future generations of We the People to decide what functions we expected out of our Government

Oh, but they did say so....By vesting power in the hands of the people, they ensured that at any point the Government gets out of control, the people can take it out.

Exactly, and if We the People want the Government to do more, they will

Yep...however, if they want to limit them they will do that too....I guess when Trump is re elected that will be step in that process.

Why hasn’t Trump limited Government?

He has increased spending

The House is responsible for spending.
Who’s in charge of the House?

 

[Correll]

93% of the crap he does is negative.

Next!

Creptius,

Tell me the 7% positive?

Well probably 99% but don't hold me to the 1% is did good on...

The guy is up on 10,000 lies... Are they looking for a fucking parade?

I think the 7% are the rare occasions when he keeps his mouth shut.

I think you know the media is completely corrupt but you don't care because it is corrupt in your favor.

 

[Gornoodle]

Trump did illegal things and the coverage is not positive, Can you imagine that?

 

[Correll]

Trump did illegal things and the coverage is not positive, Can you imagine that?

THat is a load of crap on multiple levels, and you know it.


Why you lie?

 

[Andylusion]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

And 30 people died in Iran attack! I heard it.... on the news.