- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
Trump's campaign is hampered by this judges rulings... that's interference... not that it matters much Trump is beating biden by 9 today....
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bragg's Case Against Trump - election interference - politically motivated? I have the answer.
- Thread starter Procrustes Stretched
- Start date
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
I'll read it but I'm noting that you have no Idea what the crime is... so maybe we should read it together...Crimes - plural.
read the indictment. follow the trial
all will be revealed
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #23
Its not a criminal act and it doesn't warrant a criminal trial....
District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
April 4, 2023Read the Indictment and the Statement of Facts
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. today announced the indictment of DONALD J. TRUMP, 76, for falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election. During the election, TRUMP and others employed a “catch and kill” scheme to identify, purchase, and bury negative information about him and boost his electoral prospects. TRUMP then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity, including attempts to violate state and federal election laws.
TRUMP is charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.
District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
“The People of the State of New York allege that Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” said District Attorney Bragg. “Manhattan is home to the coun
manhattanda.org
statement of facts:
indictment:
Got it....."crimes" but.....?Crimes, not crime. Read the indictment.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #25
Campaign shenanigans highlighted in the courtroom:District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
April 4, 2023
Read the Indictment and the Statement of Facts
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. today announced the indictment of DONALD J. TRUMP, 76, for falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election. During the election, TRUMP and others employed a “catch and kill” scheme to identify, purchase, and bury negative information about him and boost his electoral prospects. TRUMP then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity, including attempts to violate state and federal election laws.
TRUMP is charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.
District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
“The People of the State of New York allege that Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” said District Attorney Bragg. “Manhattan is home to the coun
statement of facts:
indictment:
Pecker, National Enquirer would have suppressed biggest story ‘since the death of Elvis Presley’
The Enquirer learned that a Trump Tower doorman, Dino Sajudin, was shopping a story that Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock with a Trump Tower maid. It was about three months after Pecker had agreed in an August 2015 meeting with Trump and lawyer Michael Cohen to “catch and kill” negative stories about Trump, and to publish positive stories about the real estate developer.
But even before checking out the story, Pecker and the Enquirer agreed to pay Sajudin $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his story. Pecker testified that he made the payment to keep the story out of the market with other publications. Also, Pecker said, “I bought the story, if the story was true, and I published it, it would be probably the biggest sale of the National Enquirer since the death of Elvis Presley.” The Enquirer famously obtained, and published on its cover, a photo of Presley lying in his coffin after his death in August 1977.
Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked Pecker whether he had “any intention of publishing it at the time you negotiated this deal?”
No, Pecker said. “If the story came back true, I would’ve published the story shortly after it was verified … after the election.” Pecker added later, “I made the decision to purchase the story to avoid potential embarrassment it would have to the campaign, the campaign and Mr. Trump.”
The allegation turned out to be false. Pecker said Trump offered, through Cohen, to take a DNA test to dispel the allegation, but the Enquirer debunked it without needing Trump’s help.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #26
post #23Got it....."crimes" but.....?
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
None of that has ever caused a criminal trial.... its nothing that takes a seated jury to remedy... it requires a fine at best... and in this case since it was 14 years ago it is passed the statute of limitations... the judge should have dismissed this case on day one...District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
April 4, 2023
Read the Indictment and the Statement of Facts
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. today announced the indictment of DONALD J. TRUMP, 76, for falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election. During the election, TRUMP and others employed a “catch and kill” scheme to identify, purchase, and bury negative information about him and boost his electoral prospects. TRUMP then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity, including attempts to violate state and federal election laws.
TRUMP is charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.
District Attorney Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Indictment of Former President Donald J. Trump
“The People of the State of New York allege that Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” said District Attorney Bragg. “Manhattan is home to the coun
statement of facts:
indictment:
Why are you so reluctant to say what the crime is in your own words?... because when you do you know how ridiculous it really is?....
Last edited:
Wow, sounds like they are trying to create a new law as they go along.Campaign shenanigans highlighted in the courtroom:
Pecker, National Enquirer would have suppressed biggest story ‘since the death of Elvis Presley’
The Enquirer learned that a Trump Tower doorman, Dino Sajudin, was shopping a story that Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock with a Trump Tower maid. It was about three months after Pecker had agreed in an August 2015 meeting with Trump and lawyer Michael Cohen to “catch and kill” negative stories about Trump, and to publish positive stories about the real estate developer.
But even before checking out the story, Pecker and the Enquirer agreed to pay Sajudin $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his story. Pecker testified that he made the payment to keep the story out of the market with other publications. Also, Pecker said, “I bought the story, if the story was true, and I published it, it would be probably the biggest sale of the National Enquirer since the death of Elvis Presley.” The Enquirer famously obtained, and published on its cover, a photo of Presley lying in his coffin after his death in August 1977.
Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked Pecker whether he had “any intention of publishing it at the time you negotiated this deal?”
No, Pecker said. “If the story came back true, I would’ve published the story shortly after it was verified … after the election.” Pecker added later, “I made the decision to purchase the story to avoid potential embarrassment it would have to the campaign, the campaign and Mr. Trump.”
The allegation turned out to be false. Pecker said Trump offered, through Cohen, to take a DNA test to dispel the allegation, but the Enquirer debunked it without needing Trump’s help.
Good luck, Joe, Obama and Clinton if this new law stands. A lot of presidents are
going to be facing the legal system
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #29
Your pathetic opinion(s) is noted. Facts prove your regurgitation of MAGA talking pints to be untrue.None of that has ever caused a criminal trial.... its nothing that takes a seated jury to remedy... it requires a fine at best... and in this case since it was 14 years ago it is passed the statute of limitations... the judge should have dismissed his case on day one...
Why are you so reluctant to say what the crime is in your own words?... because when you do you know how ridiculous it really is?....
Now you're an expert on what judges should and should not do. Okay.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
You know that this judge has ran to put himself on every Trump related NY case where he has jurisdiction in?... that alone is expected to cause this case to be overturned on appeal....Your pathetic opinion(s) is noted. Facts prove your regurgitation of MAGA talking pints to be untrue.
Now you're an expert on what judges should and should not do. Okay.
Other presidents do it and it's.......crickets.Your pathetic opinion(s) is noted. Facts prove your regurgitation of MAGA talking pints to be untrue.
Now you're an expert on what judges should and should not do. Okay.
Trump does it ands it's......prison.
Taking a misdemeanor and creating a felony out of it is just priceless.
Equal application of the law.
Ummm, dainty, YOU are the troll. The indictment lists no underlying crime.You go from what are the crimes, to the presidential horse race?
Okay, trollboi.
You know it, (or maybe you're so stupid you don't?) and we know it. So does the vast majority of the people of New York.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #33
Now we skip over to a predicate (underlying) crime? Revealed during trial. State law says no predicate crime has to be listed in any indictment.Ummm, dainty, YOU are the troll. The indictment lists no underlying crime.
You know it, (or maybe you're so stupid you don't?) and we know it. So does the vast majority of the people of New York.
fail
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #34
Only the jury matters, and they will not be listening to your regurgitation of MAGA talking points.the vast majority of the people of New York.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
Only the jury matters, and they will not be listening to your regurgitation of MAGA talking points.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 23,894
- 12,586
- 1,288
No question about the crime.Even long time leftist attorneys are scratching their heads over this... what is the crime?...
Do you know what the crime is or what law was broken in this case?... I'm serious... I would like to know so maybe I could understand it better... I'm watching the trial coverage and I can't see a crime... I see embarrassing stuff come out but its all the things we already know about... just airing the same dirty laundry over and over again and keep Trump in the courtroom is election interference....
"Yet this case is not really about election interference, nor is it a politically motivated attempt to criminalize a benign personal deal. Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity."
Opinion | I Was an Attorney at the D.A.’s Office. This Is What the Trump Case Is Really About.
Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity.web.archive.org
The author Rebecca Roiphe used to work in the office that is prosecuting Mr. Trump. Ms. Roiphe is a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. More than anyone, she seems to have no dog in the fight over what this is really all about.
In time, after the smoke created by lawyers has cleared, it will be easy to see why the prosecution is both solid and legitimate."Yet this case is not really about election interference, nor is it a politically motivated attempt to criminalize a benign personal deal. Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity."
Opinion | I Was an Attorney at the D.A.’s Office. This Is What the Trump Case Is Really About.
Boring as it may sound, it is a case about business integrity.
The author Rebecca Roiphe used to work in the office that is prosecuting Mr. Trump. Ms. Roiphe is a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. More than anyone, she seems to have no dog in the fight over what this is really all about.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
What is the crime?... help me out here...No question about the crime.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 23,894
- 12,586
- 1,288
You don't see it. You are on home care. Be safe.What is the crime?... help me out here...
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,321
- 62,900
- 3,605
Again another liberal can't answer the question... if Trump had Obama up on charges that are not crimes you would be losing your mind... Aren't you adult enough to admit that?...You don't see it. You are on home care. Be safe.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 106
- Views
- 797
- Replies
- 47
- Views
- 276
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 77
- Replies
- 80
- Views
- 755
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 67
- Views
- 565
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 158
- Replies
- 111
- Views
- 561
- Replies
- 81
- Views
- 241
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-