TV news coverage of Trump 93% negative.

[Correll]

93% of the crap he does is negative.

Next!

Creptius,

Tell me the 7% positive?

Well probably 99% but don't hold me to the 1% is did good on...

The guy is up on 10,000 lies... Are they looking for a fucking parade?

I think the 7% are the rare occasions when he keeps his mouth shut.

I think you know the media is completely corrupt but you don't care because it is corrupt in your favor.

Lol, I think you believe the so called "main stream media" is corrupt because they tell you uncomfortable truths.

No, you do not think that. That is a lie you say, to hide your side's corruption.

 

[Alexandre Fedorovski]

93% of the crap he does is negative.

Next!

Really? Please indicate WHAT specifically Trump did "negative" in economy. Has he done ANYTHING positive???

 

[skye]

I said it before and I'll say it again.....

It's not like Breaking News to say 90% plus of TV News coverage of President Trump is negative....

We all know that by now, don't we.

 

[Crepitus]

He did

93% of the crap he does is negative.

Next!

Really? Please indicate WHAT specifically Trump did "negative" in economy. Has he done ANYTHING positive???

Some prison reform stuff I can get behind, and he got out of the way and let the Democrats in the house fix his stupid New NAFTA thing.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

 

[rightwinger]

I said it before and I'll say it again.....

It's not like Breaking News to say 90% plus of TV News coverage of President Trump is negative....

We all know that by now, don't we.

100 percent of what Trump says is worthy of criticism

 

[Dr Grump]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......

Why wouldn't it be negative. He is the retard that keeps on giving....

 

[cnm]

The Media Research Center is an American politically conservative content analysis group based in Reston, Virginia, founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III. It characterizes itself as a media watchdog, but Politico considers it an anti-mainstream advocacy group and the Columbia Journalism Review considers it "propaganda clothed as critique".Wikipedia​

 

[cnm]

Barely enough hours in the day.

 

[it_is_the_light]

Trump 2020 !

 

[it_is_the_light]

@ 1:40
HUGE ROAR For President Trump The SECOND He Shows His Face to This FIRED UP Crowd!

 

[Correll]

The Media Research Center is an American politically conservative content analysis group based in Reston, Virginia, founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III. It characterizes itself as a media watchdog, but Politico considers it an anti-mainstream advocacy group and the Columbia Journalism Review considers it "propaganda clothed as critique".Wikipedia​

So, you are denying that media coverage of Trump has been negative?

 

[Correll]

The Media Research Center is an American politically conservative content analysis group based in Reston, Virginia, founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III. It characterizes itself as a media watchdog, but Politico considers it an anti-mainstream advocacy group and the Columbia Journalism Review considers it "propaganda clothed as critique".Wikipedia​

So, you are denying that media coverage of Trump has been negative?

 

[IM2]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

 

[Correll]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

Obama could not maintain his ratings, despite a constant flow of propaganda from people like you, in the media.


Trump, despite the complete opposite treatment from the same completely corrupt media, has managed to hold on to much more of his popularity, than Obama did.


See? Playing with spin, is a game everyone can play.

 

[rightwinger]

Barely enough hours in the day.

Yea..who would want to cover the impeachment of a President

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

Obama could not maintain his ratings, despite a constant flow of propaganda from people like you, in the media.


Trump, despite the complete opposite treatment from the same completely corrupt media, has managed to hold on to much more of his popularity, than Obama did.


See? Playing with spin, is a game everyone can play.

The Great Obama left with 60 percent approval
Crooked Donnie has yet to break 50 percent

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

Obama could not maintain his ratings, despite a constant flow of propaganda from people like you, in the media.


Trump, despite the complete opposite treatment from the same completely corrupt media, has managed to hold on to much more of his popularity, than Obama did.


See? Playing with spin, is a game everyone can play.

The Great Obama left with 60 percent approval
Crooked Donnie has yet to break 50 percent

 

[BlindBoo]

I think the 7% are the rare occasions when he keeps his mouth shut.

I think you know the media is completely corrupt but you don't care because it is corrupt in your favor.

Faux and other Media are not corrupt because people are too stupid to know the difference between News and Opinion shows design to look and feel like News. Opinion shows are designed to shape public opinion not inform the public.

My point stands. The media is corrupt and the libs like it, because the media is corrupt in their favor.

Cons love their Faux News and you know it. The Media in the country have always tried to shape public opinion. Faux was the first and still has the best for profit cable TV Opinion disguised as News programming. However, MSNBC has been catching up.

Your desire to derail the thread is noted and denied.


The media is corrupt and the libs like it, because the media is corrupt in their favor.

I understand your 93% excludes Faux and the Alternative Reality of the Trump Echo-chamber of horrors.

It's for people like the Rabid Right that the First Amendment was written.

 

[Nostra]

I said it before and I'll say it again.....

It's not like Breaking News to say 90% plus of TV News coverage of President Trump is negative....

We all know that by now, don't we.

100 percent of what Trump says is worthy of criticism

Your opinion means nothing since you admit that anyone who agrees with you is wrong.

 

[Nostra]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

Obama could not maintain his ratings, despite a constant flow of propaganda from people like you, in the media.


Trump, despite the complete opposite treatment from the same completely corrupt media, has managed to hold on to much more of his popularity, than Obama did.


See? Playing with spin, is a game everyone can play.

The Great Obama left with 60 percent approval
Crooked Donnie has yet to break 50 percent

Apples and oranges. You need to wait until 2024 when Trump leaves office to use Barry's approval rating when he left office for comparison.

Let's do an apples to apples and compare approval ratings for both to date in their respective terms

Trump: 51%

Barry Hussein: 45%


President Donald J. Trump > Barry Hussein.



Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports®