TV news coverage of Trump 93% negative.

[Lysistrata]

How does one report accurately that a treaty has been repudiated? A U.S. ambassador has been sabotaged? A regulation designed to keep our air and water supplies clean has been repealed? Support for a non-profit group dedicated to the reproductive health of Americans, including preventing unwanted pregnancies, has been withdrawn. And much more.

How would you report this in a positive light?

 

[Correll]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

Really?

Obama had a shitty economy and this shows his approval rating was 1 point higher in his third year. With this economy, trump should be at 60 percent. But he's in the 40's.

Because he sucks.

Obama could not maintain his ratings, despite a constant flow of propaganda from people like you, in the media.


Trump, despite the complete opposite treatment from the same completely corrupt media, has managed to hold on to much more of his popularity, than Obama did.


See? Playing with spin, is a game everyone can play.

The Great Obama left with 60 percent approval
Crooked Donnie has yet to break 50 percent

I never said that the media's propaganda was not effective.

 

[Correll]

I think you know the media is completely corrupt but you don't care because it is corrupt in your favor.

Faux and other Media are not corrupt because people are too stupid to know the difference between News and Opinion shows design to look and feel like News. Opinion shows are designed to shape public opinion not inform the public.

My point stands. The media is corrupt and the libs like it, because the media is corrupt in their favor.

Cons love their Faux News and you know it. The Media in the country have always tried to shape public opinion. Faux was the first and still has the best for profit cable TV Opinion disguised as News programming. However, MSNBC has been catching up.

Your desire to derail the thread is noted and denied.


The media is corrupt and the libs like it, because the media is corrupt in their favor.

I understand your 93% excludes Faux and the Alternative Reality of the Trump Echo-chamber of horrors.

It's for people like the Rabid Right that the First Amendment was written.

How do you know that? The Big Three, and the rest of the mainstream media are vastly larger than Fox.


Or are you just saying shit, like so many of your allies in the media do?


The First Amendment? All the efforts at suppression of speech is coming from the Left, so, wtf are you even talking about?

 

[BlindBoo]

How do you know that? The Big Three,

The NewsBuster/Media Research Center analysis only covered the three Broadcast networks newscasts....

Or are you just saying shit, l

No, it's right there in the link

The First Amendment?

Only one side calls the free press the "Enemy of the People" and or "Corrupt". The Rabid Right seems to be a hop skip and a jump away from calling it, or making it criminal to criticize the Great Pumpkin head "Trumpybear".

 

[Correll]

How do you know that? The Big Three,

The NewsBuster/Media Research Center analysis only covered the three Broadcast networks newscasts....

Or are you just saying shit, l

No, it's right there in the link

The First Amendment?

Only one side call the free press the "Enemy of the People" and or "Corrupt". The Rabid Right seems to be a hop skip and a jump away from calling it, or making it criminal to criticize the Great Pumpkin head "Trumpybear".

Your thought on what our criticism "seems" like it might lead to, is not credible, especially as it is in the same post as you lie about what our complaint is.

 

[Rambunctious]

I've turned off the American media...I do not like to be lied to...

 

[rightwinger]

I've turned off the American media...I do not like to be lied to...

I get my news from USMB

 

[sartre play]

Right wing TV & media promote, report, agree with anything that supports right wing propaganda

Left wing TV & media promote, report agree with anything that supports left wing propaganda

 

[BlindBoo]

Your thought on what our criticism "seems" like it might lead to, is not credible, especially as it is in the same post as you lie about what our complaint is.

You asked, and you've been most insistent that media news is corrupt so, I'm not surprised you feel that way.

 

[Correll]

Your thought on what our criticism "seems" like it might lead to, is not credible, especially as it is in the same post as you lie about what our complaint is.

You asked, and you've been most insistent that media news is corrupt so, I'm not surprised you feel that way.

The media is clearly corrupt. And your assumption that pointing that out, "seems" to lead to whatever, is not credible.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

How Popular Is Donald Trump?

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

trump never reaced 50%, his highest was 45.1%; Obama highes was 59%

See the links above.

 

[Correll]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

How Popular Is Donald Trump?

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

trump never reaced 50%, his highest was 45.1%; Obama highes was 59%

See the links above.

Yeah, despite the massive corruption and propaganda shown by the numbers of the OP.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

How Popular Is Donald Trump?

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

trump never reaced 50%, his highest was 45.1%; Obama highes was 59%

See the links above.

Trump has always had more negatives than positives

 

[Nostra]

Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.

I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......



TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.

At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:

■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).

From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)

It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.

■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.

For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.

TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative

Yet he’s still more popular than Obama was after 3 years who had MSM working for him.

How Popular Is Donald Trump?

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

trump never reaced 50%, his highest was 45.1%; Obama highes was 59%

See the links above.

538?

Those clowns gave Trump a 5% chance of winning in 2016.