Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 27,716
- 13,002
- 973
The video doesn’t prove he knowingly lied.It is on video you stupid prick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The video doesn’t prove he knowingly lied.It is on video you stupid prick.
no such privilege, so you're factually wrong.Holder notified the Congress that he was protected by Executive Privilege.
Bannon had no such protection
Holder also turned over 7,000 plus documents
What did Lois Lerner turn over?Holder notified the Congress that he was protected by Executive Privilege.
Bannon had no such protection
Holder also turned over 7,000 plus documents
Depends I guessare you saying circumstantial evidence doesn't convict people?
I don’t think so.
James Clapper denies lying to Congress about NSA surveillance program
James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, denied Tuesday that he lied to Congress when he falsely testified during the Obama administration that the government does "not wittingly" collect the telephone records of millions of Americans.apnews.com
He is a Democrat who works with cartels to bring them unaccompanied minors they can groom into trannies. Democrats love him.so what's the difference from Eric Holder or the others then?
You comments prove you really are not worth talking to.The video doesn’t prove he knowingly lied.
did you type that with a straight face? hahahahahaahahahahahaa holy fk. what do they have on you dude?The video doesn’t prove he knowingly lied.
Regardless...it makes prosecuting very problematicBefore I post anything else.......I'm just curious.
The most senior US intelligence official told a Senate oversight panel that he “simply didn’t think” of the National Security Agency’s efforts to collect the phone records of millions of Americans when he testified in March that it did “not wittingly” snoop on their communications.
James Clapper: I gave 'erroneous' answer because I forgot about Patriot Act
Do you really believe this?
I have reasonable doubt.Before I post anything else.......I'm just curious.
The most senior US intelligence official told a Senate oversight panel that he “simply didn’t think” of the National Security Agency’s efforts to collect the phone records of millions of Americans when he testified in March that it did “not wittingly” snoop on their communications.
James Clapper: I gave 'erroneous' answer because I forgot about Patriot Act
Do you really believe this?
Is Eric Holder the topic of this thread?Has the statute of limitations expired for Obama's A.G. Eric Holder who was charged with the same thing and merely walked away or have we regressed into a Banana Republic that imprisons it's political enemies?
that's not evidence, is it?Depends I guess
You’re very angryYou comments prove you really are not worth talking to.
I have a doubt about you for sure.I have reasonable doubt.
I don’t think so.
James Clapper denies lying to Congress about NSA surveillance program
James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, denied Tuesday that he lied to Congress when he falsely testified during the Obama administration that the government does "not wittingly" collect the telephone records of millions of Americans.apnews.com
I am not angry, you are stupid.You’re very angry
his name came up while discussing Tulsi's comments, so yeah.Is Eric Holder the topic of this thread?
Regardless...it makes prosecuting very problematic
He also said “most truthful”. Going to be hard to call that a confession."The Least Untruthful".
The "Least: untruthful is still untruthful
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...826d299ff459_blog.html?utm_term=.b3d35c70d286
Angry people say things like that. Go touch grassI am not angry, you are stupid.