Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

[Lesh]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...826d299ff459_blog.html?utm_term=.b3d35c70d286

The least untruthful is still untrue. Even arguing he "forgot" is saying what about the administration? That the National Security advisor had no idea what was going on under him? Shouldn't that get him fired?

I don't believe he has that job anymore

 

[pknopp]

He also said “most truthful”. Going to be hard to call that a confession.

Not when we know it wasn't truthful. You are either arguing he lied or was completely incompetent.

 

[jc456]

Angry people say things like that. Go touch grass

angry people don't make any sense, and I would say you are 0 for right now, so you're angry.

 

[pknopp]

I don't believe he has that job anymore

He lied. You know he lied but feel this compunction to defend him anyway. I can not understand that.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I don't see this as defending him. She is pointing out he was charged while others were not and that is not fair. She is not wrong there.

She is deflecting......and yes, she is defending Bannon...


If Tulsi was so concerned about fairness -- why doesn't she call out the leadership in the DOJ who was put into place by the same admin she is always caping up for...


Everything with Conservatives is projection -- they are clutching their pearls yelling "Oh my, the DOJ has been weaponized" -- while these are the same folks who yelled lock her up for 6 or 7 years...


And Steve Bannon himself gave away the gameplan when he said the next GOP president will fire all of the rank and file people in agencies like the DOJ and replace them with loyalists...

 

[jc456]

I don't believe he has that job anymore

neither did bannon. What's your point?

 

[Lesh]

He lied. You know he lied but feel this compunction to defend him anyway. I can not understand that.

I think that's likely.

I'm no fan of Clapper by the way but prosecuting him over that would be extremely difficult

 

[jc456]

She is deflecting......and yes, she is defending Bannon...


If Tulsi was so concerned about fairness -- why doesn't she call out the leadership in the DOJ who was put into place by the same admin she is always caping up for...


Everything with Conservatives is projection -- they are clutching their pearls yelling "Oh my, the DOJ has been weaponized" -- while these are the same folks who yelled lock her up for 6 or 7 years...


And Steve Bannon himself gave away the gameplan when he said the next GOP president will fire all of the rank and file people in agencies like the DOJ and replace them with loyalists...

no not at all. what she is saying is that if bannon is being punished then they all should get punished the same. That's all. funny you missed her point.

 

[Lesh]

neither did bannon. What's your point?

That makes no sense

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Being unable to prove something is definitely a reason not to charge someone. This is obvious to everyone except you I guess.

Another bullshit artist . A. K. A. Liar.

 

[pknopp]

She is deflecting......and yes, she is defending Bannon...


If Tulsi was so concerned about fairness -- why doesn't she call out the leadership in the DOJ who was put into place by the same admin she is always caping up for...

What administration is that and what has she said?

Everything with Conservatives is projection -- they are clutching their pearls yelling "Oh my, the DOJ has been weaponized" -- while these are the same folks who yelled lock her up for 6 or 7 years...


And Steve Bannon himself gave away the gameplan when he said the next GOP president will fire all of the rank and file people in agencies like the DOJ and replace them with loyalists...

She is right that our justice system is anything but fair and partial. It's why I support things burning.

 

[pknopp]

I think that's likely.

I'm no fan of Clapper by the way but prosecuting him over that would be extremely difficult

Which is no excuse not to do it and those in charge his prosecution would have exposed isn't about to prosecute those who did their bidding.

Burn it all down.

 

[Lesh]

It's why I support things burning.

Then you need to be roundly ignored..at best

 

[Marener]

Not when we know it wasn't truthful. You are either arguing he lied or was completely incompetent.

Clapper has plenty of defenses. Proving someone know they lied is never easy.

 

[Lesh]

Which is no excuse not to do it and those in charge his prosecution would have exposed isn't about to prosecute those who did their bidding.

Burn it all down.

ATTICA ATTICA

**** off..."burn it down"

Yea...anarchy will fix everything...idiot

 

[pknopp]

Then you need to be roundly ignored..at best

It's worked. Things have improved since things burned.

 

[Marener]

angry people don't make any sense, and I would say you are 0 for right now, so you're angry.

This guy thinks we should prosecute people even if there’s no case to see if one magically appears in court.

 

[pknopp]

Clapper has plenty of defenses. Proving someone know they lied is never easy.

He said he lied. And it's never going to happen by those who caused him to lie.

 

[Marener]

He said he lied. And it's never going to happen by those who caused him to lie.

He also said he was being the most truthful before you selectively edited his quote.

 

[Lastamender]

Angry people say things like that. Go touch grass

Maybe, but what you have said establishes you do not give one **** about this country, equal justice, and outright lies from this illegitimate administration. On you traitor.