Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

[Marener]

This is about the peoole not charged for lying to Congress. Bannon is only guilty of not saying anything. Try to stay on topic.

We don’t charge people when there’s no case. That’s what fascists do with political persecution. It doesn’t hold up in our courts.

Why is that what you want to do?

Also Bannon’s name is in the title of the thread.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

they do love to love the children eh?

I hear some of those kids end up in secret labs where globalist develop trans medicine.

Word on the street is they look like 1/2 children's hospital,1/2 nazi death camp.

 

[Lastamender]

We don’t charge people when there’s no case. That’s what fascists do with political persecution. It doesn’t hold up in our courts.

Why is that what you want to do?

Also Bannon’s name is in the title of the thread.

It is holding up in our courts. Look at the jail time given for trespassing. Do you comprehend anything you see or hear? It does not seem like it.

 

[Marener]

was he guilty before he was charged? let's see where you are on law.

Weird question. I suppose philosophically you’re guilty the second you commit the offense but he had not been found guilty in a court of law when he was charged.

There was a case against him that could prove his was guilty. It was actually a really easy case to make. He got a subpoena. He ignored the subpoena. That’s illegal.

 

[Marener]

It is holding up in our courts. Look at the jail time given for trespassing. Do you comprehend anything you see or hear? It does not seem like it.

People who were video taped trespassing are found guilty of trespassing. I think that’s how it’s supposed to work.

 

[jc456]

Weird question. I suppose philosophically you’re guilty the second you commit the offense but he had not been found guilty in a court of law when he was charged.

so what's the difference from Eric Holder or the others then?

 

[Lastamender]

People who were video taped trespassing are found guilty of trespassing. I think that’s how it’s supposed to work.

You keep deflecting. 5 people who lied to Congress were never charged because their politics agreed with those in power. That is fascism, which you support, and therefore you are a fascist.

 

[Marener]

so what's the difference from Eric Holder or the others then?

Eric Holder responded to the subpoena when he notified Congress that they were withholding documents because Obama had claimed executive privilege.

 

[Marener]

You keep deflecting. 5 people who lied to Congress were never charged because their politics agreed with those in power. That is fascism, which you support, and therefore you are a fascist.

They weren’t charged because there’s no way to prove they were lying.

Our courts require you prove things.

 

[pknopp]

Eric Holder responded to the subpoena when he notified Congress that they were withholding documents because Obama had claimed executive privilege.

Clapper freely admitted he told the least offensive lie he could come up with and wasn't charged.

 

[pknopp]

They weren’t charged because there’s no way to prove they were lying.

Our courts require you prove things.

It was proved Clapper lied. Of course the one who exposed that has been paying for it ever since.

 

[jc456]

Eric Holder responded to the subpoena when he notified Congress that they were withholding documents because Obama had claimed executive privilege.

he still didn't observe the subpoena right? Obama had no right to do that. It was congress. Just like with Trump, right? trump didn't have a right to claim executive privilege right?

 

[jc456]

It was proved Clapper lied. Of course the one who exposed that has been paying for it ever since.

comey overstepped his authority clearing hitlery of wrong doing. that wasn't his job. WTF?

 

[Marener]

he still didn't observe the subpoena right? Obama had no right to do that. It was congress. Just like with Trump, right? trump didn't have a right to claim executive privilege right?

The president has a right to claim executive privilege. In fact, only the president has a right to claim executive e privilege.

 

[Lastamender]

They weren’t charged because there’s no way to prove they were lying.

Our courts require you prove things.

It is on video you stupid prick.

 

[jc456]

The president has a right to claim executive privilege. In fact, only the president has a right to claim executive e privilege.

nope, demofks said trump had no legal authority. you guys can't keep your stories straight.

 

[Marener]

Clapper freely admitted he told the least offensive lie he could come up with and wasn't charged.

I don’t think so.

James Clapper denies lying to Congress about NSA surveillance program

James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, denied Tuesday that he lied to Congress when he falsely testified during the Obama administration that the government does "not wittingly" collect the telephone records of millions of Americans.

apnews.com

 

[Lesh]

so what's the difference from Eric Holder or the others then?

Holder notified the Congress that he was protected by Executive Privilege.

Bannon had no such protection

Holder also turned over 7,000 plus documents

 

[pknopp]

comey overstepped his authority clearing hitlery of wrong doing. that wasn't his job. WTF?

I don't disagree. I've said many times Hillary should have been charged. It would have saved the country a lot of grief.

 

[jc456]

They weren’t charged because there’s no way to prove they were lying.

Our courts require you prove things.

are you saying circumstantial evidence doesn't convict people?