Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When you "fact check" the President .....but you don't "fact check" the networks spreading Communist Chinese propaganda, then yes, you get to be shut down.
Hope the President signs the executive order NOW!
He can’t order Twitter to do jack shit. It’s a private company.
Both sides aren't the president misinforming people about their abilty to vote by mail.If Twitter wants to do that...then they should apply it equally towards both sides.......they don't.
The media is not spreading chinese anything. trump is trying to violate the first amendment and you're all for it. Pitiful.When you "fact check" the President .....but you don't "fact check" the networks spreading Communist Chinese propaganda, then yes, you get to be shut down.
Hope the President signs the executive order NOW!
That problem would not be thus solved. It was merely a logical suggestion in line with desiring to control a sector seen as taking advantage of its position.How would nationalizing twitter solve the problem of having a lying scum bag President like Donald Trump constantly misinforming and misleading American citizens? Why do you want to take free speech away from the owners of Twitter?
It Isn’t Your Imagination: Twitter Treats Conservatives More Harshly Than Liberals
Harassment and the advocacy of violence are serious issues, and there is nothing morally objectionable about social media companies.quillette.com
mediabiasfactcheck.com
...and other business sectors exploiting people and the environment.A big orchid to President Trump for ramping up the national discussion of censorship on the World Wide Web.
Of course, as usual, the President is threatening to do something over which he has very little real authority.
But at least he has reminded us that sooner or later, there has to be some meaningful legislation regarding this matter.
Well, in that case, we would have to weigh and decide if we want to socialize public platforms like Twitter or even USMB. The debate will hinge on whether a private company should have a level of free speech. So far, the censorship talk and whining are all nonsense, distortion, and misinformation. None of the President's tweets/comments/statements were deleted or even edited by Twitter. They simply indicated the factual accuracy of his comments may be in doubt and gave suggested sources for individual research and confirmation. The individual has every right to selecting alternative research sources. Nothing even close to censorship has occurred.That problem would not be thus solved. It was merely a logical suggestion in line with desiring to control a sector seen as taking advantage of its position.How would nationalizing twitter solve the problem of having a lying scum bag President like Donald Trump constantly misinforming and misleading American citizens? Why do you want to take free speech away from the owners of Twitter?
If Trump doesn't want his tweets labeled as lies, he should quit tweeting lies.
Congress and past presidents have done legislation that told private companies what to do and how to do it.Who said anything about Congress?But congress has that right?But the courts decided that, and they are the ones who need to reverse it. The President doesn't have the authority to tell a private company what to do. They have "standards" and if he doesn't like it, he doesn't have to use them. Right?If you want control...you're a publishers. No more
indemnity protections...then sue every day.
Big Tech Trying to Have it Both Ways as Platform and Publisher
Google, Facebook and Twitter are private companies, so the constitutionaltownhall.com
LOLOLYes he will heheWhen you "fact check" the President .....but you don't "fact check" the networks spreading Communist Chinese propaganda, then yes, you get to be shut down.
Hope the President signs the executive order NOW!
He can’t order Twitter to do jack shit. It’s a private company.
So I can open a bakery and there will be no problem if I refuse to bake a cake for faggots, right?It’s their site....they set the rules of behaviorIf you want control...you're a publishers. No more
indemnity protections...then sue every day.
Whatever he tries to do to Twitter would apply here as well.Well, in that case, we would have to weigh and decide if we want to socialize public platforms like Twitter or even USMB. The debate will hinge on whether a private company should have a level of free speech. So far, the censorship talk and whining are all nonsense, distortion, and misinformation. None of the President's tweets/comments/statements were deleted or even edited by Twitter. They simply indicated the factual accuracy of his comments may be in doubt and gave suggested sources for individual research and confirmation. The individual has every right to selecting alternative research sources. Nothing even close to censorship has occurred.That problem would not be thus solved. It was merely a logical suggestion in line with desiring to control a sector seen as taking advantage of its position.How would nationalizing twitter solve the problem of having a lying scum bag President like Donald Trump constantly misinforming and misleading American citizens? Why do you want to take free speech away from the owners of Twitter?
while i do think trump talks too much, it would be his right, wouldn't it? now if others have the right to tag onto his posts and "call him a liar" then would he be able to defend himself? are we really wanting to de-evolve into this type of an abyss?A big orchid to President Trump for ramping up the national discussion of censorship on the World Wide Web.
Of course, as usual, the President is threatening to do something over which he has very little real authority.
But at least he has reminded us that sooner or later, there has to be some meaningful legislation regarding this matter.
Twitter is so liberal that its conservative employees ‘don’t feel safe to express their opinions,’ says CEO Jack DorseyView attachment 341923It Isn’t Your Imagination: Twitter Treats Conservatives More Harshly Than Liberals
Harassment and the advocacy of violence are serious issues, and there is nothing morally objectionable about social media companies.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Quillette is a right leaning blog that features lengthy, well written articles. Headlines occasionally utilize loaded language such as this: Cowardice at Columbia. This story is also properly sourced to credible local media and provides video evidence. In another article, Jordan Peterson, And the New Chivalry they report favorably on Jordan Peterson who has made several anti-Feminist statements and has called for “enforced monogamy”, and “The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence.”
Editor-in-Chief and Founder Claire Lehmann is considered a part of the Intellectual Dark Web, which is a term used to describe a “group of public personalities who oppose what they see as the dominance of progressive identity politics and political correctness in the media and academia.” The primary mission of the IDW is to reject political correctness and embrace a free thinking discussion of controversial topics. Further, according to the left leaning Village Voice, Claire Lehmann, believes “nationalism is the antidote to racism,” and claims to have been “blacklisted” for “criticizing feminism”.
In general, Quillette promotes right leaning positions such as anti-feminism and questionable viewpoints regarding racism. For example, in this article they state “Racist attitudes of whites towards blacks have long become socially unacceptable in America, although the reverse, racism of a minority directed at the white majority, is still tolerated or even encouraged.”
Reverse racism is controversial and disputed by some. It is certainly possible for minorities to be prejudiced against Whites, however some believe racism requires “systematic oppression which is built into the government, institutions and social structures. Without this factor of systematic oppression, there cannot be racism.” This article also talks at length about IQ differences between whites and blacks and while not definitively stating it, repeats over and over that genetics are a factor in racial IQ differences (hereditarianism, which is a pseudoscientific viewpoint).
Further, on May 29, 2019, Quillette published an article by Eoin Lenihan, claiming there are “connections between antifascist activists and national-level reporters who cover the far-right.” According to Columbia Journalism Review, Lenihan “identified himself as an online extremism researcher, despite having no association with any previously known organization that researches extremism. In reality, Lenihan was already an established right-wing troll, now blanket banned for ‘violating rules against managing multiple Twitter accounts for abusive purposes.’” When asked by CJR if the information contained in the story was fact checked, Quillette declined to comment.
Overall, we rate Quillette Questionable based on the promotion of racial pseudoscience and the use of poor sources.
Quillette - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
A RW victimhood website.
trump trump trump. Please re read my post, you seem to have a problem comprehending what I posted.Both sides aren't the president misinforming people about their abilty to vote by mail.If Twitter wants to do that...then they should apply it equally towards both sides.......they don't.
