Trump in Colorado

[Zebra]

should he have the right to run there?

or have had?


a very topical and also difficult question

 

[LeroyDumonde]

It's an easy question to answer. He didn't engage in insurrection or rebellion and meets all the other legibility criteria as well. So yes, he should be able to run. If Democrats really thought that he'd engaged in insurrection Garland would have brought charges against him.

 

[Rambunctious]

9-0 just like we predicted.... dems have lost their minds and their way...

 

[Zebra]

He didn't engage in insurrection or rebellion and meets all the other legibility criteria as well.

is everybody sure of that?

 

[JoeB131]

It's an easy question to answer. He didn't engage in insurrection or rebellion and meets all the other legibility criteria as well. So yes, he should be able to run. If Democrats really thought that he'd engaged in insurrection Garland would have brought charges against him.

Except that's not what the court found.

The court found that CONGRESS should have the say on whether someone was an insurrectionist. it did not address the issue of whether or not Jan 6 was an insurrection.

 

[Zebra]

2/7 suggest the South Pole ….

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's an easy question to answer. He didn't engage in insurrection or rebellion and meets all the other legibility criteria as well. So yes, he should be able to run. If Democrats really thought that he'd engaged in insurrection Garland would have brought charges against him.

Flatly wrong. He did in engage in insurrectionary behavior.

The only question is that of in which arena can be judged?

I think the national election in the midst of his trials is the correct answer.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

is everybody sure of that?

Maybe except the usual morons!

 

[Foxfyre]

is everybody sure of that?

Everybody who can read and hear with any degree of cognizance, who respects the law, who respects the Constitution and the constitutional right to free speech and to peacefully assemble and petition their government for redress of grievances, who has sufficient ability for critical thinking to not accuse the whole for the actions of a few are sure of that.

 

[Mac1958]

Any other ruling would have been a bad idea.

If he wins, he wins. We deserve what we get.

 

[BluesLegend]

And the Dem lawfare goes down in flames!!

 

[Zebra]

nobody wishes him to the North Pole?

 

[Yarddog]

is everybody sure of that?

Everyone that matters. He's not convicted or charged with that for a reason.
Not everyone is sure the earth is round...... so everybody doesnt always have to be on board.
Trump should be allowed to run in Colorado

 

[Independentthinker]

should he have the right to run there?

or have had?


a very topical and also difficult question

Why wouldn't he?

 

[Rambunctious]

These liberal elites with law degrees are stupid people... when ordinary folks said it will be turned down at the SCOTUS and judges in the states were still going forward it shows how bad our schools have become...

 

[LeroyDumonde]

is everybody sure of that?

Yes. No one seriously thinks that he engaged in insurrection. Democrats don't even believe it.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Except that's not what the court found.

The court found that CONGRESS should have the say on whether someone was an insurrectionist. it did not address the issue of whether or not Jan 6 was an insurrection.

I know. SCOTUS didn't even look at that part of the question. But it's a simple fact that Trump didn't engage in insurrection.

 

[JoeB131]

I know. SCOTUS didn't even look at that part of the question. But it's a simple fact that Trump didn't engage in insurrection.

I'm not sure what else you can call it. His goal was to use an angry mob to overturn an election.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

I'm not sure what else you can call it. His goal was to use an angry mob to overturn an election.

He had no such goal.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

He had no such goal.

Don't believe you.