Time for bow and arrow control

[Mac-7]

87 people in about 5 minutes of driving...more people killed with that truck than any mass public shooter in the U.S. with a gun......

And yet the anti-gun extremists do not call for banning rental Trucks...

And if libs in Denmark ban bows and arrows the next crazy will use an auto

Or poison

Whatever it takes

 

[g5000]

You mean the Muslim at the Pulse Night club? Or the Asian guy at Virginia Tech?

Or the Muslim with the rental Truck….in Nice, France who killed more people with a rental truck than any mass shooter in the U.S. with a gun? 86 people killed with a rental truck……so, we should ban rental trucks….right?

The Pulse night club shooter and the Va Tech shooter both used guns and thus achieved a higher body count than they would have with a bow and arrow.

I fail to see your point.

 

[g5000]

Yes, I suppose so

But in France a couple of years ago a muslim terrorist killed dozens of people with a truck

Which means it doesnt take a gun to be a mass murderer

You don't hear about mass murders by truck very often. But we have mass shootings at least once a week here in MAGAland.

 

[2aguy]

The Pulse night club shooter and the Va Tech shooter both used guns and thus achieved a higher body count than they would have with a bow and arrow.

I fail to see your point.

A Muslim using a rental truck in Nice, France murdered 86, more than the Pulse and Virginia tech combined….so you want trucks banned too…right?

 

[2aguy]

You don't hear about mass murders by truck very often. But we have mass shootings at least once a week here in MAGAland.

No, moron, we don’t.

We had 12 in 2019, and 2 in 2020, 10in 2018……

Over 330 million people in the country and 12 nuts in 2019.

Can you see how dumb you are with numbers like that?

 

[Mac-7]

You don't hear about mass murders by truck very often.

True

Guns are the preferred choice of mass murderers in the US

But mass murder is the result of mass insanity brought on by our modern liberal society

Take away the guns and you still have crazies with a grudge against humanity

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I would like to see a law where everyone whom advocates for NO personal ownership of firearms/guns was required to wear a 3 inch wide yellow armband on each arm so if they should every be the victim of a violent crime, or shooting, I will know they do not want me to use my concealed carry firearm to defend them.

Perhaps we need to cull the herd of these idiots whom think guns/firearms are the main source of violence and assaults?

87 people in about 5 minutes of driving...more people killed with that truck than any mass public shooter in the U.S. with a gun......

And yet the anti-gun extremists do not call for banning rental Trucks...

It was 86.
So, From his 32nd-floor suites in the Mandalay Bay Hotel Stephen Paddock, fired more than 1,000 bullets, killing 60 people[a] and wounding 411, with the ensuing panic bringing the number of injured to 867.

Were 867 people injured with the rental truck? (202)

 

[2aguy]

It was 86.
So, From his 32nd-floor suites in the Mandalay Bay Hotel Stephen Paddock, fired more than 1,000 bullets, killing 60 people[a] and wounding 411, with the ensuing panic bringing the number of injured to 867.

Were 867 people injured with the rental truck? (202)

Yes...the guy with the rental truck actually murdered more people than the shooter in las vegas......and most of the injured people were injured by the stampede...not the shooting...

All of the 434 injured by the truck...were injured by the Truck....

22,000 people......and he killed 60. Injuring by gun fire 411.

The rental truck killed 86, and injured 434......

You have no argument against banning Trucks.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes...the guy with the rental truck actually murdered more people than the shooter in las vegas......and most of the injured people were injured by the stampede...not the shooting...

All of the 434 injured by the truck...were injured by the Truck....

22,000 people......and he killed 60. Injuring by gun fire 411.

The rental truck killed 86, and injured 434......

You have no argument against banning Trucks.

No.
Why would you think people would want to ban trucks?

 

[Turtlesoup]

If the victims had been armed, they might, or they might not have stopped this. The US has much worse, when people have access to guns.

AND the US has a much higher daily murder rate. Norway has a murder rate of 0.47, the US has a murder rate of 4.97.

Do you really think Norway is stupid enough to trade a 0.47 murder rate for one ten times higher, in exchange for this one attack not happening?

First off, the stats are kept different in the US from Europe-----Secondly, they don't have Chicago, Detroit etc which is why we have a higher murder rate.

 

[2aguy]

No.
Why would you think people would want to ban trucks?

Because of their potential to murder a lot of people...more people were murdered in Nice, France....86, than in any mass public shooting with guns in the U.S........they are mass murder machines.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Because of their potential to murder a lot of people...more people were murdered in Nice, France....86, than in any mass public shooting with guns in the U.S........they are mass murder machines.

Mass murder machines?
Then, of course we must ground all planes too.
265 people died just on the planes on 9/11/2001.

 

[2aguy]

Mass murder machines?
Then, of course we must ground all planes too.
265 people died just on the planes on 9/11/2001.

According to you guys, sure. Your logic has never been logic….it is simple emotion fueled by the desire to control other people.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

According to you guys, sure. Your logic has never been logic….it is simple emotion fueled by the desire to control other people.

No, that's according to you.
Banning weapons with 20-60 round magazines, high velocity that shoot tumble bullets, is suddenly a mandate to ban ALL guns.

 

[2aguy]

No, that's according to you.
Banning weapons with 20-60 round magazines, high velocity that shoot tumble bullets, is suddenly a mandate to ban ALL guns.

Its one step on the way

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Its one step on the way

Sure, like when the Ford Pinto was killing people?
They are STILL trying to ban all cars.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Banning weapons with 20-60 round magazines, high velocity that shoot tumble bullets, is suddenly a mandate to ban ALL guns.

The anti-gun loons know they have to start someonwere, and think they can sufficiently prey upon the emotions orf the ignorant to garner the support to start with 'assault weapons'.
Low-hanging fruit, as it were.

There is no sound argument for the necessity for, and efficacy of, a ban on such weapons, see...

 

[2aguy]

The anti-gun loons know they have to start someonwere, and think they can sufficiently prey upon the emotions orf the ignorant to garner the support to start with 'assault weapons'.
Low-hanging fruit, as it were.

There is no sound argument for the necessity for, and efficacy of, a ban on such weapons, see...

And it is deeper than that....

If you give them "Assault weapons," you are giving them a semi-automatic weapon...that is no different in operation than any other semi-auto rifle, pistol or shotgun...you have given them the point they believe.....that semi-automatic rifles are uniquely dangerous, and if you can ban one of them, then all of them must also be banned....since the argument was already given up that they should be banned by giving them "Assault Rifles/semi-automatic rifles."

Then, they will likely come back for revolvers...since they too are "semi-automatic" weapons...

They do nothing without prior planning...

 

[M14 Shooter]

And it is deeper than that....
If you give them "Assault weapons," you are giving them a semi-automatic weapon...that is no different in operation than any other semi-auto rifle,

Of course.
Everyone knows 'assautl weapons' are just the start - and if they tell you otherwise, they are lying.

 

[frigidweirdo]

First off, the stats are kept different in the US from Europe-----Secondly, they don't have Chicago, Detroit etc which is why we have a higher murder rate.

How are stats kept differently? And what difference does it make?

Or are you just throwing this out there hoping you've got something when you have no idea if you do or not?

They don't have Chicago or Detroit.... Why don't they? Perhaps because they have sensible policies instead of policies made by people on the take?