This is why there’s been so much extreme rainfall and flooding in the U.S.

[Sunsettommy]

I’m always here to educate you.

That will take you 3,000 years........

 

[Sunsettommy]

Yes, you are always here ------- poor guy. You should get a real life instead of this one with your keyboard.

HA HA HA HA HA, look who wrote this howler!

 

[BULLDOG]

I’m retired like you. Doing a massive kitchen remodel. Knocking out walls. Complete gut job. Wolf and Subzero appliances. I have 147 scores in GHIN in 2025. You should have my life.

And you still find time to spend 23 hours a day here spouting goofy shit. Good for you.

 

[Sunsettommy]

And you still find time to spend 23 hours a day here spouting goofy shit. Good for you.

LOL then you have been here 23 1/2 hours a day.

 

[ding]

And you still find time to spend 23 hours a day here spouting goofy shit. Good for you.

Hardly. It only feels that way to you because of all the beat downs you take. Leave it to you to think empirical climate evidence is goofy.

 

[irosie91]

Hardly. It only feels that way to you because of all the beat downs you take. Leave it to you to think empirical climate evidence is goofy.

the world zionists had to do SOMETHING with all those rain clouds stolen from
Iran ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

[BULLDOG]

Hardly. It only feels that way to you because of all the beat downs you take. Leave it to you to think empirical climate evidence is goofy.

Nothing goofy about empirical evidence. Your belief that a keyboard warrior, such as yourself is better able to interpret that evidence and come to a more accurate interpretation than credentialed scientists working in the field is about as goofy as I have seen.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Nothing goofy about empirical evidence. Your belief that a keyboard warrior, such as yourself is better able to interpret that evidence and come to a more accurate interpretation than credentialed scientists working in the field is about as goofy as I have seen.

Scientists have been wrong many times in the past, they are human like the rest of us.

Your blind devotion for a group of people you don't know and never seen how many times they have been wrong already which is why you get a lot of people be skeptical of their modeled based claims and give you the blowback because you are being ridiculous about it.

 

[BULLDOG]

Scientists have been wrong many times in the past, they are human like the rest of us.

Your blind devotion for a group of people you don't know and never seen how many times they have been wrong already which is why you get a lot of people be skeptical of their modeled based claims and give you the blowback because you are being ridiculous about it.

You act as if scientists have never been right. Every aspect of your miserable life is made better by contributions by scientists.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You act as if scientists have never been right. Every aspect of your miserable life is made better by contributions by scientists.

You are constantly misunderstanding what I post, it MUST be your low IQ how else can you miss this part which was right in front of you:

Scientists have been wrong many times in the past, they are human like the rest of us.

Scientists have been wrong many times in the past, I posted evidence of numerous consensus errors and you mentally ill leftists ignore it because you have been programmed to be stupid and anti science as bad science runs on the principle of falsification (unverifiable modeling scenarios) something YOU have no idea what that is.

 

[EMH]

You should reread my post. I am not a scientist, so I must rely on the judgement of those who are better informed than myself. I choose to believe the best credentialed leaders in the field. Of course, some might "do their own research" by searching web sites, and learn some of the basic concepts and terms. I call those Instant Internet Experts. They very easily might know more than me, but still lack the depth of knowledge and experience to credibly disprove statements made by actual credentialed experts in the field. To put it in more familiar terms, if I need my car fixed, I prefer a certified mechanic over some guy who happens to own a Chilton's Manual.

• 
  
• 
  

 

[FoghornLeghorn]

MSN

While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.

It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.

Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change. As oceans warm, the added moisture in the atmosphere will lead to more super storms. The repub party has called it lies and propped up their "experts" to refute the science. We can expect to see extreme weather episodes going forward and that will lead to more loss of life and property. Insurance rates are already skyrocketing in parts of the country where these weather extremes are prevalent. We may be too late to change course.

 

[FoghornLeghorn]

Jim is a stooge.

 

[BULLDOG]

You are constantly misunderstanding what I post, it MUST be your low IQ how else can you miss this part which was right in front of you:



Scientists have been wrong many times in the past, I posted evidence of numerous consensus errors and you mentally ill leftists ignore it because you have been programmed to be stupid and anti science as bad science runs on the principle of falsification (unverifiable modeling scenarios) something YOU have no idea what that is.

That's the way science works. They come up with their best answer until new information is found. If the new information changes their conclusion, they go with that and it starts all over again. Considering only the conclusions that are found faulty doesn't give a fair representation.

 

[ding]

Nothing goofy about empirical evidence. Your belief that a keyboard warrior, such as yourself is better able to interpret that evidence and come to a more accurate interpretation than credentialed scientists working in the field is about as goofy as I have seen.

It’s not that hard to read the oxygen isotope curve. It’s not that hard to understand why glaciation and deglaciation of the northern hemisphere drives the planet’s climate. It’s actually quite simple.

 

[ding]

That's the way science works. They come up with their best answer until new information is found. If the new information changes their conclusion, they go with that and it starts all over again. Considering only the conclusions that are found faulty doesn't give a fair representation.

You don’t know anything about science.

 

[HikerGuy83]

As soon as the scientists she mentions are peer-reviewed and the consensus agrees with them, let me know.

As soon as you can tell us what she is saying, we'll consider you informed and we'll let you know.

Otherwise, shove off.

 

[HikerGuy83]

For that many top scientists to be involved it would have to be the world's biggest conspiracy ever.

It's already been explained to you. Many of the "top scientists" won't know much about many aspects of global warming. The community is like a group of transistors each bringing a piece.

In short, many would be clueless about this.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You don’t know anything about science.

Niether does "dog crap" (i.e. schmidlap).

 

[HikerGuy83]

I've accomplished enough that I don't care if you value my opinion.

The mass of what you've accomplished would be measured in single digit nanograms.