This is Why Blacks Don't Listen to Black Sellouts

Obviously you fail to understand your own post.
Or, more likely
You're just standing by your lie.
Seriously ...

She failed to understand her own post ......

When everyone else here is acknowledging you for being an IDIOT .....

Any question folks about Leftism being a mental disorder?
The only people making that are you tiny brained "conservatives"
To which I say
BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Tiny brained morons calling people names they have to look up on spellcheck

BWAHAHAHAHA
I actually have a large cranium. I have a hard time buying hats. I don't need spell check because I actually know HOW to spell! It's something us "older folks" learned back in the day! :)
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Gee, did a big word like cranium confuse you, "Einstein"? :)
Please.
You cannot seem to comprehends the difference between the cranium and the brain.
Given the amount of empty space between your cranium and the tiny box holding your tiny brain so it doesn't bounce around a lot, it's no wonder thoughts get lost along the way.
Comprehends? It's comprehend, "Einstein".
You think that our brains are held in boxes? Really?
I hate to break this to you, Sparky but you get dumber with each post.
WOW! Another member of the IGP (Internet Grammar Police) checks in.
Going to cuff me Nofficer?
Throw me in USMB prison?

Geez....

Yes. Box is the best description I could come up with for the tiny container holding your even tinier mind within that beachball size head. If you've a better description let's hear it but "Outhouse Hole" is already taken.

BWAHAHAHAHA
What's bwahahaha ?

You having a stroke ? Do you want us to call 911?
 
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Your antiquated Alinsky syle politics are meaningless .....

Just saying ....
Alinsky?

From the crowd that just tried to overthrow the US government?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Your propaganda isn't working. We were defending our Constitutional government from leftist trash. Big difference.
You were defending the Constitution by overthrowing the government and installing a dictator?

OK then.
 
  • Love
Reactions: IM2
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Your antiquated Alinsky syle politics are meaningless .....

Just saying ....
Alinsky?

From the crowd that just tried to overthrow the US government?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Your propaganda isn't working. We were defending our Constitutional government from leftist trash. Big difference.
You were defending the Constitution by overthrowing the government and installing a dictator?

OK then.
Obama?
 
Obviously you fail to understand your own post.
Or, more likely
You're just standing by your lie.
Seriously ...

She failed to understand her own post ......

When everyone else here is acknowledging you for being an IDIOT .....

Any question folks about Leftism being a mental disorder?
The only people making that are you tiny brained "conservatives"
To which I say
BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Tiny brained morons calling people names they have to look up on spellcheck

BWAHAHAHAHA
I actually have a large cranium. I have a hard time buying hats. I don't need spell check because I actually know HOW to spell! It's something us "older folks" learned back in the day! :)
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Gee, did a big word like cranium confuse you, "Einstein"? :)
Please.
You cannot seem to comprehends the difference between the cranium and the brain.
Given the amount of empty space between your cranium and the tiny box holding your tiny brain so it doesn't bounce around a lot, it's no wonder thoughts get lost along the way.
Comprehends? It's comprehend, "Einstein".
You think that our brains are held in boxes? Really?
I hate to break this to you, Sparky but you get dumber with each post.
WOW! Another member of the IGP (Internet Grammar Police) checks in.
Going to cuff me Nofficer?
Throw me in USMB prison?

Geez....

Yes. Box is the best description I could come up with for the tiny container holding your even tinier mind within that beachball size head. If you've a better description let's hear it but "Outhouse Hole" is already taken.

BWAHAHAHAHA
What's bwahahaha ?

You having a stroke ? Do you want us to call 911?
You spelled it wrong.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
 
  • Love
Reactions: IM2
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Your antiquated Alinsky syle politics are meaningless .....

Just saying ....
Alinsky?

From the crowd that just tried to overthrow the US government?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Your propaganda isn't working. We were defending our Constitutional government from leftist trash. Big difference.
You were defending the Constitution by overthrowing the government and installing a dictator?

OK then.
Obama?
Sure. In what passes for your mind.
 
  • Love
Reactions: IM2
You were defending the Constitution by overthrowing the government and installing a dictator?

OK then.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Any questions ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

About Leftism being an unmedicated Mental Disorder?
So you think the people acting on 1/6 were suffering from a mental disorder?

Yeah, me to.

It's called Tinybrainitus
You should be very familiar with the symptoms.
You've displayed them often enough
 
  • Love
Reactions: IM2
So you think the people acting on 1/6 were suffering from a mental disorder?

Yeah, me to.

It's called Tinybrainitus
You should be very familiar with the symptoms.
You've displayed them often enough
Perhaps you should revisit my comment.

I didn't say anything about 1/6.

I posted that your comment was evidence of "Leftism being an unmedicated Mental Disorder"
 
Funny how these guys are allowed to hijack threads with off topic bullshit. But let me do that to one of their race bait threads about blacks and posts get deleted.

The OP is about why we don't listen to black sellouts. That's because white racists support them. I won't be listening to any black person scrubs like purebsfilter, Model T. Ford, or oldoutofstyle say are sucessful.
 
Funny how these guys are allowed to hijack threads with off topic bullshit. But let me do that to one of their race bait threads about blacks and posts get deleted.

The OP is about why we don't listen to black sellouts. That's because white racists support them. I won't be listening to any black person scrubs like purebsfilter, Model T. Ford, or oldoutofstyle say are sucessful.
Racist.
 
Obviously you fail to understand your own post.
Or, more likely
You're just standing by your lie.
Seriously ...

She failed to understand her own post ......

When everyone else here is acknowledging you for being an IDIOT .....

Any question folks about Leftism being a mental disorder?
The only people making that are you tiny brained "conservatives"
To which I say
BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Tiny brained morons calling people names they have to look up on spellcheck

BWAHAHAHAHA
I actually have a large cranium. I have a hard time buying hats. I don't need spell check because I actually know HOW to spell! It's something us "older folks" learned back in the day! :)
Your cranium is expected to be large.
I need lots of space for my free rent in there.
BUUUUUT
I didn't say "cranium," I said "tiny brained."

AND

As shown by your response, the Tiny Brained "conservative" Theory holds up every time.
Damn, I'm like freakin Einstein!
Gee, did a big word like cranium confuse you, "Einstein"? :)
Please.
You cannot seem to comprehends the difference between the cranium and the brain.
Given the amount of empty space between your cranium and the tiny box holding your tiny brain so it doesn't bounce around a lot, it's no wonder thoughts get lost along the way.
Comprehends? It's comprehend, "Einstein".
You think that our brains are held in boxes? Really?
I hate to break this to you, Sparky but you get dumber with each post.
WOW! Another member of the IGP (Internet Grammar Police) checks in.
Going to cuff me Nofficer?
Throw me in USMB prison?

Geez....

Yes. Box is the best description I could come up with for the tiny container holding your even tinier mind within that beachball size head. If you've a better description let's hear it but "Outhouse Hole" is already taken.

BWAHAHAHAHA
What's bwahahaha ?

You having a stroke ? Do you want us to call 911?
You spelled it wrong.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA

English not your first language?
 
Funny how these guys are allowed to hijack threads with off topic bullshit. But let me do that to one of their race bait threads about blacks and posts get deleted.

The OP is about why we don't listen to black sellouts. That's because white racists support them. I won't be listening to any black person scrubs like purebsfilter, Model T. Ford, or oldoutofstyle say are sucessful.
Says the most racist mother fucker on here
 
Says the most racist mother fucker on here
Any questions about who the REAL RACIST are?
The Democrats had slaves before the Civil War to keep blacks in fear. The Democrats fought in the Civil War to keep their slaves so they can keep them in fear. After the war the Democrats terrorized blacks and their businesses to keep them in fear. The Democrats in the 1900s still terrorized blacks to keep them in fear. Today BLM/ANTIFA terrorize blacks and their businesses to keep them in fear. Nothing has changed with Democrats.
 
"In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”

This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.

Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.

The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.



From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams

In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.

Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.

Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press

Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html
Facts!

Black Americans' biggest problem remains racism via government policies and culture from the dominant white society.
they love drinking too
 
"In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”

This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.

Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.

The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.



From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams

In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.

Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.

Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press

Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html
Facts!

Black Americans' biggest problem remains racism via government policies and culture from the dominant white society.
Yet you continue to vote for the very people like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer who keep you poor...Notice how you gasoline prices have gone up, sure isnt making you rich, notice how the taxes are going up, sure isnt making you rich...I used to feel sorry for the poor, but when they vote for the very people who keep them poor, i just laugh at their stupidity...
Now you're just a dumb ass. For you to actually believe that shows you have a supreme mental disibility. If the republican party offered something better we'd vote republican. You motherfuckers are trying to make it harder for us to vote and you're trying to tell us that stale ass lie you right wing racist punks repeat every day. Why in the FUCK would I join a party full of white USMB members?

Now stop lying about why gas prices are going up and stop lying about taxes. The only people working to make us poorer are republicans and we would be extremely stupid to support the Anglo Saxon Heritage Caucus.
Republicans had the black vote for 60 years.
Then they sold them out for the southern conservative vote
Yes, blacks were republicans for 100 years. Then they nominated Goldwater and that was the lat straw.
nope blacks changed when LBJ created the welfare plantation to keep them from working and out of mainstream america
 
"In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”

This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.

Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.

The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.



From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams

In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.

Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.

Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press

Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html
Facts!

Black Americans' biggest problem remains racism via government policies and culture from the dominant white society.
Yet you continue to vote for the very people like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer who keep you poor...Notice how you gasoline prices have gone up, sure isnt making you rich, notice how the taxes are going up, sure isnt making you rich...I used to feel sorry for the poor, but when they vote for the very people who keep them poor, i just laugh at their stupidity...
Now you're just a dumb ass. For you to actually believe that shows you have a supreme mental disibility. If the republican party offered something better we'd vote republican. You motherfuckers are trying to make it harder for us to vote and you're trying to tell us that stale ass lie you right wing racist punks repeat every day. Why in the FUCK would I join a party full of white USMB members?

Now stop lying about why gas prices are going up and stop lying about taxes. The only people working to make us poorer are republicans and we would be extremely stupid to support the Anglo Saxon Heritage Caucus.
Republicans had the black vote for 60 years.
Then they sold them out for the southern conservative vote
Yes, blacks were republicans for 100 years. Then they nominated Goldwater and that was the lat straw.
nope blacks changed when LBJ created the welfare plantation to keep them from working and out of mainstream america
Wrong. LBJ didn't create welfare. LBJ expanded welfare so blacks could get the benefits of assistance.

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children.

“ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”

Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.

The ADC plan was written by the previous and current directors of what was then U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.

From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.
 

Forum List

Back
Top