Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,526
- 2,288
For negroes like we have here on USMB, any black man who busts his ass, works hard, applies himself and keeps moving forward to be a success is a "sellout"...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”
The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.
Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”
This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.
Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.
The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.
![]()
Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History
For its first three decades, AFDC operated much like a private charity, with its case workers given discretion in investigating clients, cutting off benefits to those determined to be unsuitable, a…socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu
![]()
Children’s Bureau
Written by Kriste Lindenmeyer, Ph.D., Professor of History, University of Maryland, Baltimore County. The establishment of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in 1912 marked a high point in the effort by ma…socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu
From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.
As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams
In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.
Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.
Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press
Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.html
Black Americans' biggest problem remains racism via government policies and culture from the dominant white society.
Francis Fredric has argued that some plantation owners employed slaves as overseers.
The Social Security Act was left over from the New Deal Act before WWII. During the war most of this act was seen as unconstitutional and over turned by both Republicans and democRats. Why they left Social Security is beyond me as it violates Constitutional law. It was billed as your private saving account, no one else could touch. It would be tax free and always there if ever needed. It was a democRat, Jimmy Carter that started giving it away to ones not putting a dime into it. It was a democRat Congress that voted to 'borrow' it. It was a democRat Congress voting to tax it with the evil Algore throwing the deciding vote. It was a democRat , Obama that used it to build neighborhoods of upper middle class homes to house immigrants from the Middle East. It is democRats always telling us the Republicans are trying to steal it."In the late 1800s, depending on the city, 70% to 80% of black households were two-parent. Dr. Thomas Sowell has argued, “The black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”
The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children. Today most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law was made to exclude occupations that were mainly occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, 65 percent of blacks in America were ineligible. So for years a majority of blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.
Time out! Hold up! Whoa! Let’s take a short break from the action to talk about the assistance to single women with children part of the Social Security Act. Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 called for grants in aid to be provided to each stated as Aid To Dependent Children. “ For the purpose of enabling each State to furnish financial assistance, as far as practicable under the conditions in such State, to needy dependent children, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1936, the sum of $24,750,000, and there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year thereafter a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this title. The sums made available under this section shall be used for making payments to States which have submitted, and had approved by the Board, State plans for aid to dependent children.”
This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children without daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Seems that Sowell is unable to point this out and in fact this is part of long tradition of taking care of poor single parent white families.
Aid to Dependent Children or ADC (later renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) was Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1935. At first it functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states maintain their mothers’ aid laws that had been passed in 40 states between 1910 and 1920. With the federal government providing 1/3 of costs, the program offered aid to poor parents, imagined at that time to be always female, caring for children without a husband.
The ADC plan was written by the former directors of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in the Department of Labor, Grace Abbott and Katherine Lenroot. They lobbied hard to get this program added to the Social Security bill, which was aimed at male breadwinners, reflecting the masculinist assumptions and composition of the Committee on Economic Security (CES) that wrote the bill. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers lacked the support of a breadwinner, no matter how they got to that position.
![]()
Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History
For its first three decades, AFDC operated much like a private charity, with its case workers given discretion in investigating clients, cutting off benefits to those determined to be unsuitable, a…socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu
![]()
Children’s Bureau
Written by Kriste Lindenmeyer, Ph.D., Professor of History, University of Maryland, Baltimore County. The establishment of the U.S. Children’s Bureau in 1912 marked a high point in the effort by ma…socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu
From the time of the Childrens Bureau until 1965 no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and subsisided the disintegration of the white family. It was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.
As late as 1950, only 18% of black households were single parent. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. In 1938, black illegitimacy was about 11% instead of today’s 75%. In 1925, 85% of black households in New York City were two-parent. Today, the black family is a mere shadow of its past."-Walter Williams
In 1938 During this time of great black 2 parent family morality, the poverty rate for blacks was 80 percent. In 1959, it was 55 percent. These sky high rates of poverty occurred during the time these fools rant about the black 2 parent family. Today due to the " liberal welfare state breaking up the black family by giving them welfare" black poverty is half of what it was in 1959 and more than 1/3 of what it was in those grand old glorious days of the two parent black family.
Blacks afflicted with Internalized racism repeating bs from Daniel Moynihan should not be taken seriously in any discussion on matters of race in America.
Ross, C., Danziger, S. & Smolensky, E. The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979. Demography 24, 587–600 (1987). The level and trend of poverty in the United States, 1939–1979 | Demography | Duke University Press
Table 2. Poverty Status of People by Family Relationship, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2014, US Department of the Census, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.htmlnd me being
What's clear is that you don't understand all the handouts whites have been given as well as the fact that white racism has been bi partisan. If left to republicans the Corwin Amendment would have been law.I know this is an old thread but it came up recommended as similar to my thread about how much the Democrats hate black children.
I definitely agree with the premise of your original post. This is exactly why blacks should not listen to sellouts like yourself. You openly admit that the government intentionally harmed black families with the Social Security Act and later programs and, even so, you keep saying that the Government is the answer to black success and redemption from poverty. You also point out that not only was it the Government that worked so hard to destroy black families, it was the Democrats that worked so hard to harm black families. And yet you keep telling black Americans that their future lies in the hands of Democrats.
Yes, it is very clear that blacks should not listen to sellouts like you. The Democrats gave you a handout; they let you go to college and get those two degrees. They gave you a government or government-funded job and you became their ambassador working to keep down the rest of black America instead of working to get the rest to where you are. YOU are the sellout that black Americans need to not listen.
What's clear is that you don't understand all the handouts whites have been given as well as the fact that white racism has been bi partisan. If left to republicans the Corwin Amendment would have been law.
I worked on Los Angeles' skid row you years, I knew a number of pan handlers. the ones that were like you described had mental illness problems, but there were a lot of relatively clean ones that I talked to that thought jobs were for suckers when they could usually clear a couple of hundred dollars a day panhandling. Oh by the way, most of the panhandlers were white, not members of any minority.There's a greasy negro who, every day, sits down on St. George Street, a pedestrian thoroughfare in St. Augustine and begs for money. He's been offered a job by many of the stores along St. George, but has declined every single offer. He says he shouldn't have to work hard for money.
That negro is probably going to die, right there on St. George Street. No one will give a fuck either, nor should they. People have offered to help him but, because that help wasn't in the form of a five dollar bill, he wasn't interested. Even the blacks walking down St. George avoid this guy. He smells like he's been bathing in his own piss and shit for a month.
So, don't whine about handouts to whites, as if they're unjust because handouts aren't offered to coloreds. They are. The coloreds are just too fucking stupid to take advantage of them...
When your balls drop one of your boys will steal them.When my balls drop, you will be sucking on them. Whites here do all the whining, your gaslighting doesn't change a damn thing.
And yet for decades the majority users of the welfare system have been single parent white females. Oops!nope blacks changed when LBJ created the welfare plantation to keep them from working and out of mainstream america
nope blacks changed when LBJ created the welfare plantation to keep them from working and out of mainstream america
Nice to see the graduates of Bob Jones University delivering such logical and well researched posts.Bad news for you ultra racists master baiters.........
The races are blending. By the time you get around to actually winning your reparations and thrones.......the majority will be mixed race.
You'll be asking other black and brown people to pay up.
Stupid.When your balls drop one of your boys will steal them.
The government owes dumb ass. That's who reparations are being asked from. Blacks paid taxes while whites got things blacks were excluded from. So drop the ignorance dumb ass.Bad news for you ultra racists master baiters.........
The races are blending. By the time you get around to actually winning your reparations and thrones.......the majority will be mixed race.
You'll be asking other black and brown people to pay up.
Shut the fuck up. History and public policy shows that whites recieved economic assistance blacks were denied.There's a greasy negro who, every day, sits down on St. George Street, a pedestrian thoroughfare in St. Augustine and begs for money. He's been offered a job by many of the stores along St. George, but has declined every single offer. He says he shouldn't have to work hard for money.
That negro is probably going to die, right there on St. George Street. No one will give a fuck either, nor should they. People have offered to help him but, because that help wasn't in the form of a five dollar bill, he wasn't interested. Even the blacks walking down St. George avoid this guy. He smells like he's been bathing in his own piss and shit for a month.
So, don't whine about handouts to whites, as if they're unjust because handouts aren't offered to coloreds. They are. The coloreds are just too fucking stupid to take advantage of them...
Incorrect.The Social Security Act was left over from the New Deal Act before WWII. During the war most of this act was seen as unconstitutional and over turned by both Republicans and democRats. Why they left Social Security is beyond me as it violates Constitutional law. It was billed as your private saving account, no one else could touch. It would be tax free and always there if ever needed. It was a democRat, Jimmy Carter that started giving it away to ones not putting a dime into it. It was a democRat Congress that voted to 'borrow' it. It was a democRat Congress voting to tax it with the evil Algore throwing the deciding vote. It was a democRat , Obama that used it to build neighborhoods of upper middle class homes to house immigrants from the Middle East. It is democRats always telling us the Republicans are trying to steal it.
'
More ignorant whiteness. Everything whites have is due to government help but whites like you tell us how that is wrong. That's why you like uncle toms because they tell blacks to keep paying taxes to help whites without demanding that we get back some of what we put in the pot.I know this is an old thread but it came up recommended as similar to my thread about how much the Democrats hate black children.
I definitely agree with the premise of your original post. This is exactly why blacks should not listen to sellouts like yourself. You openly admit that the government intentionally harmed black families with the Social Security Act and later programs and, even so, you keep saying that the Government is the answer to black success and redemption from poverty. You also point out that not only was it the Government that worked so hard to destroy black families, it was the Democrats that worked so hard to harm black families. And yet you keep telling black Americans that their future lies in the hands of Democrats.
Yes, it is very clear that blacks should not listen to sellouts like you. The Democrats gave you a handout; they let you go to college and get those two degrees. They gave you a government or government-funded job and you became their ambassador working to keep down the rest of black America instead of working to get the rest to where you are. YOU are the sellout that black Americans need to not listen.
Whites coomit more crime and elect thugs to make laws. Racism is non partisan, but the racists on the republican right love trying to blame democrats. I live in a republican state, republicans here are the racists.Actually, the crime, the thug life, the culture, even the diets, are the results of Democrat white racism - at least in part by intentional design. Overseer IM2 is smart enough to know this but he's a tool. They gave him his cut and he's going to be their tool to keep the rest on the Democrat plantation.
![]()
Slave Overseers
In 1860 it was calculated that about 88 per cent of America's slave-owners owned twenty slaves or less. However, large landowners would usually own well over 100 slaves and relied heavily on overseers to run their plantations.spartacus-educational.com
Shut the fuck up. History and public policy shows that whites recieved economic assistance blacks were denied.