Two Thumbs
Platinum Member
well that's a lieI think you are intentionally not understanding.is the First Amendment against the law now?so you're happy that hillary destroyed an innocent man
you're just as evil as her
An "innocent" man - who pled guilty to manufacture of methamphetamine and running a massive bank fraud scheme?
Is that what you meant by innocent?
was he guilty of producing a video?
I don't care if the guys a dick, he didn't have what hillary did to him coming
No, but using aliases and the Internet while on probation for stealing people's identities, opening fake bank accounts and kiting thousands of dollars worth of checks is.
Or do laws not apply to people who hate Muslims as much as you?
what kind of person he is isn't the point
what hillary did to him is and the fact that you support the actions of a tyrant.
he's an asshole, so it's ok to accuse him of something he's not guilty of so (D) gets a walk
Again, he was undeniably guilty of violating his parole - which is exactly what he was sent back to jail for. Hillary Clinton didn't do anything to him.