Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Four years after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack Hillary Clinton is running for president and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is broke, destitute and living in a homeless shelter.
Nakoula is the film maker Hillary falsely claimed was responsible for the 'violent protest' in Benghazi on 9/11/12. ... Except there was no 'violent' protest:
People on the ground in Benghazi during the attack said there was NEVER a protest.
The State Department Lead in Tripoli said there was NEVER a protest.
The CIA said there was never a sign of any protest.
The FBI said there was never a protest.
Hillary told a Turkish Ambassador in an e-mail, "We KNOW this was a terrorist attack - the video played no part in it."
Hillary told her daughter in an e-mail that it had been a terrorist attack and the video played no part.
PUBLICLY, however, Freedom-Loving Barry and Hillary condemned Nakoula for exercising his 1st Amendment Rights, falsely blamed HIM for the TERRORIST attack, APOLOGIZED to the world for an American exercising his 1st Amendment Right, and vowed to arrest him for doing so. ... AND THEY DID.
In fact, the FILMMAKER who was falsely arrested spent more time in jail than did the 'mastermind behind the Benghazi attacks' that Barry captured over a year later.
Now he is broke and lives in a homeless shelter while the corrupt dain bramaged bit@h is running for President.
"Nakoula's life was nothing more than collateral damage for the Obama-Hillary machine in their quest for power."
Coptic Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attack Now Broke, Living in Homeless Shelter
Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.
No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.
Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?
It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.
We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?
So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?
He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.
Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.
You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.
...and he had nothing to do with Benghazi, but those fuck ups in the White House/state dept. had to drag him into it for no other reason to save their sorry fucking incestouse asses. LolIf anything shows what a despicable piece of shit Hillary is, this is it. She destroyed a man's life purely for political expediency.
How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?
Be specific.
Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?
What happened to "personal responsibility"?
What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?
I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.
How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?
No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.
All of that was true before he made that video.
Such is life for convicted felons in the US.
Untrue. Felons can get jobs pretty easily so long as they aren't notorious. This dude is the definition of notorious, and all because the government lied about him. I am frankly surprised that you are defending the indefensible.
We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?
So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?
He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.
Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.
You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.
It's not a "minor" violation to use aliases and the internet when youve been convicted of using aliases and the Internet to steal thousands of dollars.
So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?
He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.
Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.
You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.
It's not a "minor" violation to use aliases and the internet when youve been convicted of using aliases and the Internet to steal thousands of dollars.
Yes it is.
He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.
Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.
You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.
It's not a "minor" violation to use aliases and the internet when youve been convicted of using aliases and the Internet to steal thousands of dollars.
Yes it is.
No, it's really not. You're either staggeringly ignorant about the legal system, or just a raving hypocrite.
I can't wait for the next "black people committing crimes" thread, so I can remind you of how parole violations aren't "real" crimes.
You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.
It's not a "minor" violation to use aliases and the internet when youve been convicted of using aliases and the Internet to steal thousands of dollars.
Yes it is.
No, it's really not. You're either staggeringly ignorant about the legal system, or just a raving hypocrite.
I can't wait for the next "black people committing crimes" thread, so I can remind you of how parole violations aren't "real" crimes.
Yes, it really is a minor parole violation.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.
No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.
In other words, it was entirely benign. He didn't use it to defraud anyone.
AHEMMMMM...and he had nothing to do with Benghazi, but those fuck ups in the White House/state dept. had to drag him into it for no other reason to save their sorry fucking incestouse asses. LolHow did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?
Be specific.
Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.
No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.
In other words, it was entirely benign. He didn't use it to defraud anyone.
By that standard, if a convicted felon on parole is found in possession of a gun, it's "benign" if he doesn't use it to shoot anyone.
AHEMMMMM...and he had nothing to do with Benghazi, but those fuck ups in the White House/state dept. had to drag him into it for no other reason to save their sorry fucking incestouse asses. LolObviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
BENGHAZI is not the only town in the entire middle east or Muslim world....you do know that, don't you?
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the attack on the American diplomatic mission in Libya, see 2012 Benghazi attack.
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims
Methods
- Demonstrations
- Riots
- Raids
- Arson
- Assault
Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths[show]
At least 694-695 injured[show]
On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.
On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Nice try, no one watched the video I tried to find it a few days after the 11th and it was hard to find because it had so few views. Anyway anyone that would be offended by such a poorly made comedy can only be a terrorist. Therefore the Obama administration and their fucked up state department used it to cover up their absolute fuck up on treatment of our own people in the United States Embassy.AHEMMMMM...and he had nothing to do with Benghazi, but those fuck ups in the White House/state dept. had to drag him into it for no other reason to save their sorry fucking incestouse asses. LolObviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.
How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.
Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.
Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?
Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
BENGHAZI is not the only town in the entire middle east or Muslim world....you do know that, don't you?
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the attack on the American diplomatic mission in Libya, see 2012 Benghazi attack.
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims
Methods
- Demonstrations
- Riots
- Raids
- Arson
- Assault
Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths[show]
At least 694-695 injured[show]
On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.
On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.
He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".
He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.
"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.
No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.
In other words, it was entirely benign. He didn't use it to defraud anyone.
By that standard, if a convicted felon on parole is found in possession of a gun, it's "benign" if he doesn't use it to shoot anyone.
ROFL! The internet is hardly the equivalent of a gun.
Firearm ownership is an absolute right, the Internet not so much"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.
No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.
In other words, it was entirely benign. He didn't use it to defraud anyone.
By that standard, if a convicted felon on parole is found in possession of a gun, it's "benign" if he doesn't use it to shoot anyone.
ROFL! The internet is hardly the equivalent of a gun.
How are they different, if they're both tools used to commit crimes?
I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.
How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?
No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.
All of that was true before he made that video.
Such is life for convicted felons in the US.
Untrue. Felons can get jobs pretty easily so long as they aren't notorious. This dude is the definition of notorious, and all because the government lied about him. I am frankly surprised that you are defending the indefensible.
What is it that you think I'm "defending"?
Frankly, I'm surprised that you guys are going so far to defend a drug dealer and con man - who, among other things, stole the SS numbers of hundreds of people (including a six-year old) in order to open bank accounts in their names and kite thousands of dollars worth of checks.
I know politics makes for strange bedfellows, but this is a little far.
How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?
No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.
All of that was true before he made that video.
Such is life for convicted felons in the US.
Untrue. Felons can get jobs pretty easily so long as they aren't notorious. This dude is the definition of notorious, and all because the government lied about him. I am frankly surprised that you are defending the indefensible.
What is it that you think I'm "defending"?
Frankly, I'm surprised that you guys are going so far to defend a drug dealer and con man - who, among other things, stole the SS numbers of hundreds of people (including a six-year old) in order to open bank accounts in their names and kite thousands of dollars worth of checks.
I know politics makes for strange bedfellows, but this is a little far.
Yes, thousands. Like I said, he's a petty criminal. What I find reprehensible is our government decided to lie about a persons culpability in a terrible event that led to the deaths of four Americans, purely for political reasons, and no progressive seems to think its a big deal. Just how far do you think it's OK for a government to go?
they invented it, if you had an IQ you could see thatI'm really just embarrassed for you. The dude is a criminal, and he made his own bed. I don't give a rats ass if he's broke.
There's the liberal compassion you're all so famous for.
Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?
It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.
We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?
So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?
Hillary and Obama planted the evidence, isn't it obvious?
