This Guy Should Sue Hillary For Every Dime She Has

[theDoctorisIn]

He's broke...good.

so you're happy that hillary destroyed an innocent man

you're just as evil as her

An "innocent" man - who pled guilty to manufacture of methamphetamine and running a massive bank fraud scheme?

Is that what you meant by innocent?

is the First Amendment against the law now?

was he guilty of producing a video?

I don't care if the guys a dick, he didn't have what hillary did to him coming

No, but using aliases and the Internet while on probation for stealing people's identities, opening fake bank accounts and kiting thousands of dollars worth of checks is.

Or do laws not apply to people who hate Muslims as much as you?

No one gives a shit what kind of person he was, but he was definitely a scapegoat for the fucked up incestouse Obama administration.
...and the video had nothing to do with the riots that killed four Americans

I'm not talking about what kind of guy he is - I'm talking about the very specific crimes that he has committed.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He's broke...good.

so you're happy that hillary destroyed an innocent man

you're just as evil as her

An "innocent" man - who pled guilty to manufacture of methamphetamine and running a massive bank fraud scheme?

Is that what you meant by innocent?

is the First Amendment against the law now?

was he guilty of producing a video?

I don't care if the guys a dick, he didn't have what hillary did to him coming

No, but using aliases and the Internet while on probation for stealing people's identities, opening fake bank accounts and kiting thousands of dollars worth of checks is.

Or do laws not apply to people who hate Muslims as much as you?

I think you are intentionally not understanding.

what kind of person he is isn't the point

what hillary did to him is and the fact that you support the actions of a tyrant.

he's an asshole, so it's ok to accuse him of something he's not guilty of so (D) gets a walk

Again, he was undeniably guilty of violating his parole - which is exactly what he was sent back to jail for. Hillary Clinton didn't do anything to him.

 

[Rustic]

I'm really just embarrassed for you. The dude is a criminal, and he made his own bed. I don't give a rats ass if he's broke.

There's the liberal compassion you're all so famous for.

Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?

It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.

We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?

So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?

Hillary and Obama planted the evidence, isn't it obvious?

The fact of the matter is, it makes no difference what type a guy this dude is. He played no part in Benghazi, the video had nothing to do with any riots. No one watched the video anyways,and for anyone to be offended by such a poorly made comedy has to be only terrorists.
The guy was the scapegoat for a political fuck up… Fact

 

[bripat9643]

Are you embarrassed by what the criminal you support did to another American?

I'm really just embarrassed for you. The dude is a criminal, and he made his own bed. I don't give a rats ass if he's broke.

There's the liberal compassion you're all so famous for.

Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?

It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.

We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?

So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?

He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.

Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.

 

[westwall]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Indeed he did. And he is a scumbag. However, the claim that his video was the cause of the attack is a provable lie, and the admin completely destroyed this mans life which is the definition of "cruel and unusual" punishment. They destroyed him for their political gain, so that makes them even worse scumbags. Don't you think?

Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?

What happened to "personal responsibility"?

What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?

I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.

How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?

No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Four years after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack Hillary Clinton is running for president and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is broke, destitute and living in a homeless shelter.


Nakoula is the film maker Hillary falsely claimed was responsible for the 'violent protest' in Benghazi on 9/11/12. ... Except there was no 'violent' protest:

People on the ground in Benghazi during the attack said there was NEVER a protest.

The State Department Lead in Tripoli said there was NEVER a protest.

The CIA said there was never a sign of any protest.

The FBI said there was never a protest.

Hillary told a Turkish Ambassador in an e-mail, "We KNOW this was a terrorist attack - the video played no part in it."

Hillary told her daughter in an e-mail that it had been a terrorist attack and the video played no part.


PUBLICLY, however, Freedom-Loving Barry and Hillary condemned Nakoula for exercising his 1st Amendment Rights, falsely blamed HIM for the TERRORIST attack, APOLOGIZED to the world for an American exercising his 1st Amendment Right, and vowed to arrest him for doing so. ... AND THEY DID.

In fact, the FILMMAKER who was falsely arrested spent more time in jail than did the 'mastermind behind the Benghazi attacks' that Barry captured over a year later.

Now he is broke and lives in a homeless shelter while the corrupt dain bramaged bit@h is running for President.

"Nakoula's life was nothing more than collateral damage for the Obama-Hillary machine in their quest for power."

Coptic Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attack Now Broke, Living in Homeless Shelter

If anything shows what a despicable piece of shit Hillary is, this is it. She destroyed a man's life purely for political expediency.

How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?

Be specific.

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

 

[bripat9643]

so you're happy that hillary destroyed an innocent man

you're just as evil as her

An "innocent" man - who pled guilty to manufacture of methamphetamine and running a massive bank fraud scheme?

Is that what you meant by innocent?

is the First Amendment against the law now?

was he guilty of producing a video?

I don't care if the guys a dick, he didn't have what hillary did to him coming

No, but using aliases and the Internet while on probation for stealing people's identities, opening fake bank accounts and kiting thousands of dollars worth of checks is.

Or do laws not apply to people who hate Muslims as much as you?

I think you are intentionally not understanding.

what kind of person he is isn't the point

what hillary did to him is and the fact that you support the actions of a tyrant.

he's an asshole, so it's ok to accuse him of something he's not guilty of so (D) gets a walk

Again, he was undeniably guilty of violating his parole - which is exactly what he was sent back to jail for. Hillary Clinton didn't do anything to him.

Puhleeze. You have to be terminally gullible to believe that the administration was not on the phone with the LA police and courts demanding that this guy be sent to prison. In fact, Hillary even bragged about doing that to one of the parents of the Benghazi victims.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I'm really just embarrassed for you. The dude is a criminal, and he made his own bed. I don't give a rats ass if he's broke.

There's the liberal compassion you're all so famous for.

Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?

It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.

We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?

So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?

He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.

Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.

You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?

You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Indeed he did. And he is a scumbag. However, the claim that his video was the cause of the attack is a provable lie, and the admin completely destroyed this mans life which is the definition of "cruel and unusual" punishment. They destroyed him for their political gain, so that makes them even worse scumbags. Don't you think?

Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?

What happened to "personal responsibility"?

What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?

I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.

How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?

No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.

All of that was true before he made that video.

Such is life for convicted felons in the US.

 

[Care4all]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

He violated probation by using the internet.

THAT DANGEROUS SONOFABITCH!!

and please tell us why was ''not using the internet'' part of his parole...?

 

[westwall]

If anything shows what a despicable piece of shit Hillary is, this is it. She destroyed a man's life purely for political expediency.

How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?

Be specific.

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

A good friend of mine who is now retired from the Alameda County SO, was hit by a parolee who tried to steal his gun. In the attack he broke my friends jaw. Fortunately my friend is tough as nails so he beat the guy down and cuffed him. The man was a violent felon on parole. According to SOP the perp should have been immediately violated back to prison and an additional nine years added to his sentence. The asshole was walking the street the next day.

Now you tell me that a non violent perp, who is basically a low level con man is so threatening that he had to be violated back???? Pulease... The entire legal system is screwed up, but the violation back to prison was entirely political.

 

[Care4all]

what the heck? Even if Benghazi never existed...the guy's video caused all kinds of hell...


Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the attack on the American diplomatic mission in Libya, see 2012 Benghazi attack.
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims

Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims
Methods

• Demonstrations
• Riots
• Raids
• Arson
• Assault

Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths[show]

At least 694-695 injured[show]
On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

He violated probation by using the internet.

THAT DANGEROUS SONOFABITCH!!

and please tell us why was ''not using the internet'' part of his parole...?

...that would be because he was convicted of computer crimes.

I have a couple friends who were banned for using the internet (or even touch-tone phones), back in the day.

 

[westwall]

Indeed he did. And he is a scumbag. However, the claim that his video was the cause of the attack is a provable lie, and the admin completely destroyed this mans life which is the definition of "cruel and unusual" punishment. They destroyed him for their political gain, so that makes them even worse scumbags. Don't you think?

Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?

What happened to "personal responsibility"?

What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?

I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.

How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?

No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.

All of that was true before he made that video.

Such is life for convicted felons in the US.

Untrue. Felons can get jobs pretty easily so long as they aren't notorious. This dude is the definition of notorious, and all because the government lied about him. I am frankly surprised that you are defending the indefensible.

 

[bripat9643]

If anything shows what a despicable piece of shit Hillary is, this is it. She destroyed a man's life purely for political expediency.

How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?

Be specific.

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.

 

[bripat9643]

Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?

What happened to "personal responsibility"?

What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?

I'm not arguing against his incarceration for violating parole. He SHOULD have gone to prison for that. What I am arguing against is the fact that the obama admin LIED about his influence on an attack on our Embassy staff. And CONTINUED to lie about it to the destruction of the mans life. THAT is cruel and unusual punishment.

How did Obama's claim "destroy" his life?

No one will ever hire this man again. He can get no credit. I doubt he will be able to find a date ever again as every woman out there is going to know he has a huge target on his back. He has no idea how long it will be before the government decides they want to screw with him again. Having the ENTIRE weight of a national government against you, especially when you KNOW they are lying about the circumstances, screws you up.

All of that was true before he made that video.

Such is life for convicted felons in the US.

Untrue. Felons can get jobs pretty easily so long as they aren't notorious. This dude is the definition of notorious, and all because the government lied about him. I am frankly surprised that you are defending the indefensible.

Dims will defend that criminal heroes until their last breath.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?

Be specific.

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

A good friend of mine who is now retired from the Alameda County SO, was hit by a parolee who tried to steal his gun. In the attack he broke my friends jaw. Fortunately my friend is tough as nails so he beat the guy down and cuffed him. The man was a violent felon on parole. According to SOP the perp should have been immediately violated back to prison and an additional nine years added to his sentence. The asshole was walking the street the next day.

Now you tell me that a non violent perp, who is basically a low level con man is so threatening that he had to be violated back???? Pulease... The entire legal system is screwed up, but the violation back to prison was entirely political.

And I have a friend who was violated and sent back to jail for blowing a 0.05 on a breathalyzer - and he wasn't a "violent felon", nor did his original crime habe anything to do with alcohol.

I believe you, but anecdotes aren't data.

 

[bripat9643]

There's the liberal compassion you're all so famous for.

Because you know how much compassion conservatives have for (non-conservative) criminals. Right?

It's mindblowing how hypocritical you guys can be.

We're hypocrites because we think people should only be locked up for real crimes against real people?

So violating parole isn't a "real" crime? How about cooking meth, or kiting checks?

He didn't go to back to prison for cooking meth or kiting checks. he went to prison for posting a video on youTube, a violation that would have got him nothing more than a warning from his parole officer under normal circumstances.

Only a douche bag would defend the way he was railroaded for political gain.

You think that explicitly violating his parole agreement would normally result in a "slap on the wrist"?

You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

It's a minor violation. Parolees incur minor violations of their parole terms all the time without going back to prison.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

How did Hillary Clinton "destroy" this man's life?

Be specific.

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

"Sam Basile" was the pseudonym he used to post the video to youTube, so the charges are exactly as a described. He was sent to prison for posting a video on youTube. That deserved a slap on the wrist from his parole officer, and nothing more.

No, "Sam Basile" is the name he used to make the video - to hire the actors and crew, to rent the equipment, and so on.

 

[bripat9643]

Obviously she had him arrested on trumped up charges to cover for her Benghazi crimes.

How were the charges "trumped up"? There's no question that he explicitly violated his probation.

Are you saying that he should have been allowed to violate his probation after running a major identity theft and check-kiting scheme? I thought you guys were all about law and order.

Or is that just for people whose politics you don't like?

Using a pseudonym to post a video on youTube is certainly a trumped up charge. It's a legal activity that millions of people do every day. The idea that anyone should go to prison for that is something only a leftwing douche bag could believe.

He wasnt violated for "using a pseudonym on Youtube".

He was violated for setting up a business enterprise under a false name ("Sam Basile"), and accessing the internet at all - both of which were specifically prohibited by his parole agreement.

A good friend of mine who is now retired from the Alameda County SO, was hit by a parolee who tried to steal his gun. In the attack he broke my friends jaw. Fortunately my friend is tough as nails so he beat the guy down and cuffed him. The man was a violent felon on parole. According to SOP the perp should have been immediately violated back to prison and an additional nine years added to his sentence. The asshole was walking the street the next day.

Now you tell me that a non violent perp, who is basically a low level con man is so threatening that he had to be violated back???? Pulease... The entire legal system is screwed up, but the violation back to prison was entirely political.

And I have a friend who was violated and sent back to jail for blowing a 0.05 on a breathalyzer - and he wasn't a "violent felon", nor did his original crime habe anything to do with alcohol.

I believe you, but anecdotes aren't data.

Yet you posted an anecdote in an attempt to defend your criminal nominee.