Zone1 The Truth About the Modern Republican Party and Blacks

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
77,071
34,259
2,330

There is a difference between a black conservative and right-wing black sellouts. A black conservative would not deny the racism faced by blacks. A true black conservative should oppose racism because the lack of opportunity created by policies stemming from racism are examples of government overreach into the private lives of its citizens.

The G.O.P. prizes Black Republicans — as long as they don’t alienate white members​


As the entire nation grapples with issues relating to race and racial inequality, all kinds of organizations—from churches to businesses to neighborhood associations—are trying to demonstrate their commitment to racial diversity in a way that does not alienate white stakeholders. The Republican Party is no exception, and, in fact, it has long struggled to project an openness to diversity. But presenting a diverse coalition of support has particular resonance in the wake of the Trump administration.

The public representation of Black Republicans has certainly shifted under Mr. Trump’s leadership of the party. The social media personalities Diamond and Silk replaced Michael Steele, the Catholic former chair of the Republican National Committee. Former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke was more relevant than General Colin Powell. Candace Owens supplanted Condoleezza Rice. Internet celebrities have taken the place of the legislators, military leaders and judges who used to stand as the “face” of Black Republicans.

This shift reflects many of the themes I found in my research for a book about the experience of being Black in the Republican Party. Through interviews with Black Republican activists, it became clear to me that most people understand these activists based on their relationships to other Black people.

Black Republicans also told me that their opportunities for advancement in the G.O.P. depended on sticking to the party’s dominant rhetoric on race. When the Republican Party embraces white grievance, articulates anti-Black policies and raises anti-Black voices, Black Republicans are less able to talk about Republican policies in ways that will uplift Black people. The Black Republicans who articulate ideas consistent with white grievance, or who work to undermine claims of racism, are given broad platforms within the party, even when those ideas are not particularly resonant with Black audiences. This race-blind messaging is not necessarily representative of what all Black Republicans think, but it is what the primarily white leadership of Republican organizations wants to hear.

 
Today's GOP prefers members who value our constitution and the rights it bestows. It prefers people with common sense and people willing to share and work as a team. It believes in the American dream. It prefers hard workers who put forth effort and it prefers law abiding, freedom loving people. With the GOP, you get all that plus lower taxes and greater security. The Democrat party, on the other hand, gives you empty promises and phony dreams. MAGA
 
Today's GOP prefers members who value our constitution and the rights it bestows. It prefers people with common sense and people willing to share and work as a team. It believes in the American dream. It prefers hard workers who put forth effort and it prefers law abiding, freedom loving people. With the GOP, you get all that plus lower taxes and greater security. The Democrat party, on the other hand, gives you empty promises and phony dreams. MAGA
No they don't. And we get none of those things from the GOP.
 
The Black Republicans who articulate ideas consistent with white grievance, or who work to undermine claims of racism, are given broad platforms within the party, even when those ideas are not particularly resonant with Black audiences.
 
The Black Republicans who articulate ideas consistent with white grievance, or who work to undermine claims of racism, are given broad platforms within the party, even when those ideas are not particularly resonant with Black audiences.

 
A black Republican running for president is not there to represent the issues of black people. He is there to represent the issues of ALL people, according to priority.

For example, we have reached a fevered pitch with antisemitism in this country, with tens of thousands marching in support of Jew-killers, and professors making Jews stand in the corner or claiming how “exhilarating” it was to learn that 1400 Jews had been tortured to death, or having Jews being threatened to such an extent that they don’t feel safe on campus.

Senator Scott, recognizing that antisemitism has reached a crisis point, condemned it strongly - and I know he would stand strong against it if he were to become the president. He is able to prioritize the issues, and right now Jew-hate is more dangerous than racism.
 
I love the empty rhetoric.

There is a difference between a black conservative and right-wing black sellouts. A black conservative would not deny the racism faced by blacks. A true black conservative should oppose racism because the lack of opportunity created by policies stemming from racism are examples of government overreach into the private lives of its citizens.

SHOW US THE POLICIES “STEMMING FROM RACISM”.
 
CEA84BC3-4FA4-4B21-815C-F4D52E72DDDB.jpeg
 
I love the empty rhetoric.

SHOW US THE POLICIES “STEMMING FROM RACISM”.
Nothing like empty headed white attempts to deny.

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you've addressed the end of anti-Black racism you'll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.
 
.And remember, after you've addressed the end of anti-Black racism you'll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.
Why would I have to explain any of that? Because of the color of my skin? Is the fact that you didn’t include LGBT+ people in there because you are a homophobe too?

Tell us you love gay and trans white people to prove your not a white supremacist.
 
Last edited:
Nothing like empty headed white attempts to deny.

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you've addressed the end of anti-Black racism you'll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.
Unbelievable!

Antisemitism is sweeping the country, and this IM2 not only rails on and on about racism, but when he lists the other bigotries, he includes anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-native. How telling that a leftist, and a black one, leaves off the very one at a crisis point: antisemitism.
 
Why would I have to explain any of that? Because of the color of my skin? Is the fact that you didn’t include LGBT+ people in there because you are a homophobe too?

Tell us you love gay and trans white people to prove your not a white supremacist.
Sure tells us that he doesn’t care about antisemitism, despite leftists marching in support of Jew-killing terrorists, threatening to slice the necks of Jews on campus, and proudly saying they found the massacre of innocent Jews exhilarating?

He specifically avoids mentioning antisemitism.
 
The Black Republicans who articulate ideas consistent with white grievance, or who work to undermine claims of racism, are given broad platforms within the party, even when those ideas are not particularly resonant with Black audiences.
Big truths don't resonate with most blacks, others as well.
 
Nothing like empty headed white attempts to deny.

Prove when racism ended and its effects were allayed. Show, with data and peer-reviewed studies supporting your argument, when the effects of the hundreds of years of anti-Black racism from chattel slavery through Old Jim Crow leveled off. Show when the wealth expropriated during that oppression was repaid to those it was expropriated from and through. And remember, after you've addressed the end of anti-Black racism you'll still have to explain when anti-Latinx, anti-Asian, anti-Arab, and anti-Native racism came to an end as well.
Racism in America: Small potatoes.
Opportunities in America: BIG POTATOES.
 

Forum List

Back
Top