So what? Free speech.It’s on video. He made numerous statements saying that they’re going to march to the Capitol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So what? Free speech.It’s on video. He made numerous statements saying that they’re going to march to the Capitol.
Didn't you read the story? An organizer of a protest is held liable for violence at his protest that he had nothing to do with.So what? Free speech.
We already determined - without much effort - that Trump was not the organizer.Didn't you read the story? An organizer of a protest is held liable for violence at his protest that he had nothing to do with.
What about his free speech?
He is the one that sent them to the Capitol.We already determined - without much effort - that Trump was not the organizer.
In fact, he encouraged his followers to act peacefully.
You have nothing to whine about on this subject.
We already determined - without much effort - that Trump was not the organizer.
Recent Golden Gate Bridge fiascoWhich protest? What are you talking about? Which case?
Link to the court case so we can read it please. Did the organizers have a permit? Did they promote folks to do what ever they did? I haven't got a clue what you are talking about, or if it has a thing to do with First Amendment Issues, or if it was a case court.Recent Golden Gate Bridge fiasco
55 Gallon drums of Cement with Agitators attached to them across a well traveled Major Interstate Bridge during Rush Hour is not a ProtestLink to the court case so we can read it please. Did the organizers have a permit? Did they promote folks to do what ever they did? I haven't got a clue what you are talking about, or if it has a thing to do with First Amendment Issues, or if it was a case court.
Does it have a damn thing to even do with this thread?
Five words, with no link or verb, is not an argument.
Damn those facts always get in the way.PBS? The anti-Trump station?
So? That doesn’t mean he organized it.It’s on video. He made numerous statements saying that they’re going to march to the Capitol.
He’s the leader. That makes him responsible for the subsequent violence.So? That doesn’t mean he organized it.
No he’s not. Try again.He’s the leader. That makes him responsible for the subsequent violence.
Ah, so the new conservative jurisprudence only applies to black people.No he’s not. Try again.
Specious lie.Ah, so the new conservative jurisprudence only applies to black people.
This is false. He neither planned or encouraged violence.The recent "jurisprudence" held a black protest organizer responsible for violence he planned, and encouraged.
You're entitled to disagree with his trial results.This is false. He neither planned or encouraged violence.
The trial did not argue that he planned or encouraged violence.You're entitled to disagree with his trial results.
That doesn't give you leave to lie and misdirect the scenario elsewhere.
You can fuck off now.